Update: 3/20/10, 9:04am
A statement I heard as a kid has always stuck with me – “making rules is easy, following them is hard.” In the case of the use tax the state is now putting a major emphasis on collecting this tax. Sounds simple and reasonable – no?
So I just shot an email to all of our elected leaders (state executive & legislative members) asking if they paid their use taxes over the last 3 years. Letter follows:
Hi;
With the recently passed legislation, you have put a major emphasis on increasing sales tax revenue. And a significant part of that is the attempt to collect the use taxes we all owe for internet purchases where no sales tax was charged.
As you are well aware, the use tax requirement has been in place for years (decades?). All that’s new is improving the enforcement mechanism. But we all should have been paying this tax even before this new legislation.
In the spirit of showing leadership by example, I request that each of you tell me if you filed your use tax statement and paid the taxes due for 2007, 2008, & 2009. And if you have not paid the taxes – why.
As our elected leaders who create and enforce the law, I think leading by example on this issue is very important. Because if you cannot be bothered to pay your use taxes, then why should you expect it of anyone else?
Thanks – dave
I will update as I get answers. But if they don’t file (I’m guessing that will be the answer of most), then how can they expect the rest of us to do so?
Responses:
T/C: taxes collected on internet purchases; N/A not applicable as they do not shop online. | |||||
State Executives | |||||
gov | Bill | Ritter | D | ||
ag | John | Suthers | R | ||
treas | Cary | Kennedy | D | T/C | all internet purchases charged sales tax |
sos | Bernie | Buescher | D | YES | no purchases last couple of years that didn’t charge tax |
State House | |||||
1 | Jeanne | Labuda | D | ||
2 | Mark | Ferrandino | D | ||
3 | Daniel | Kagan | D | ||
4 | K.Jerry | Frangas | D | ||
5 | Joel | Judd | D | ||
6 | Lois | Court | D | T/C | only purchased airline tickets online |
7 | Terrance | Carroll | D | ||
8 | Beth | McCann | D | NO | intends to do so |
9 | Joe | Miklosi | D | ||
10 | Dickey lee | Hullinghorst | D | ||
11 | Jack | Pommer | D | ||
12 | Paul | Weissmann | D | NO | will pay going forward |
13 | Claire | Levy | D | NO | only learned this year that they are taxable |
14 | Kent | Lambert | R | ||
15 | Mark | Waller | R | ||
16 | Larry | Liston | R | YES | |
17 | Dennis | Apuan | D | ||
18 | Michael | Merrifield | D | YES | |
19 | Marsha | Looper | R | ||
20 | Amy | Stephens | R | ||
21 | Bob | Gardner | R | ||
22 | Kenneth | Summers | R | ||
23 | Max | Tyler | D | ||
24 | Sue | Schafer | D | ||
25 | Cheri | Gerou | R | ||
26 | Andy | Kerr | D | ||
27 | Sara | Gagliardi | D | ??? | "yes, I pay my taxes" – don’t know if this means no internet purchases or has paid use tax |
28 | James | Kerr | R | NO | |
29 | Debbie | Benefield | D | ||
30 | Kevin | Priola | R | ||
31 | Judy | Solano | D | ||
32 | Edward | Casso | D | ||
33 | Dianne | Primavera | D | ||
34 | John | Soper | D | ||
35 | Cherylin | Peniston | D | N/A | does not order online |
36 | Su | Ryden | D | ||
37 | Spencer | Swalm | R | ||
38 | Joe | Rice | D | ||
39 | David | Balmer | R | ||
40 | Cindy | Acree | R | ||
41 | Nancy | Todd | D | ||
42 | Karen | Middleton | D | ||
43 | Frank | McNulty | R | ||
44 | Mike | May | R | ||
45 | Carole | Murray | R | NO | |
46 | Sal | Pace | D | NO | only case: his 3 year old son got an amazon gift card |
47 | Buffie | McFadyen | D | ||
48 | Glenn | Vaad | R | ||
49 | BJ | Nikkel | R | ||
50 | Jim | Riesberg | D | ||
51 | Brian | DelGrosso | R | ||
52 | John | Kefalas | D | ||
53 | Randy | Fischer | D | ||
54 | Steve | King | R | ||
55 | Laura | Bradford | R | ||
56 | Christine | Scanlan | D | NO | |
57 | Randy | Baumgardner | R | ||
58 | Scott | Tipton | R | ||
59 | Ellen | Roberts | R | NO | |
60 | Thomas | Massey | R | ||
61 | Kathleen | Curry | D | ||
62 | Edward | Vigil | D | ||
63 | Cory | Gardner | R | ||
64 | Wesley | McKinley | D | N/A | does not order online |
65 | Jerry | Sonnenberg | R | ||
State Senate | |||||
1 | Greg | Brophy | R | NO | |
2 | Kenneth | Kester | R | N/A | does not order online |
3 | Abel | Tapia | D | ||
4 | Mark | Scheffel | R | N/A | does not order online |
5 | Gail | Schwartz | D | ||
6 | Bruce | Whitehead | D | ||
7 | Josh | Penry | R | NO | |
8 | Al | White | R | N/A | does not order online |
9 | David | Schultheis | R | ||
10 | Bill | Cadman | R | ||
11 | John | Morse | D | ||
12 | Keith | King | R | N/A | does not order online |
13 | Scott | Renfroe | R | ||
14 | Bob | Bacon | D | T/C | only online purchase is airline tickets |
15 | Kevin | Lundberg | R | ||
16 | Dan | Gibbs | D | ||
17 | Brandon | Shaffer | D | ||
18 | Rollie | Heath | D | T/C | his vendor charges him sales tax |
19 | Evie | Hudak | D | ||
20 | Mo | Keller | D | N/A | does not order online |
21 | Betty | Boyd | D | N/A | does not order online |
22 | Mike | Kopp | R | ||
23 | Shawn | Mitchell | R | NO | |
24 | Lois | Tochtrop | D | N/A | does not order online |
25 | Mary | Hodge | D | ||
26 | Linda | Newell | D | ||
27 | Nancy | Spence | R | ||
28 | Suzanne | Williams | D | ||
29 | Morgan | Carroll | D | ||
30 | Ted | Harvey | R | ||
31 | Pat | Steadman | D | ||
32 | Chris | Romer | D | ||
33 | Michael | Johnston | D | T/C | only ordered airline tickets online (got a Kindle and will be filing this year) |
34 | Paula | Sandoval | D | N/A | does not order online |
35 | Joyce | Foster | D | ||
Boulder County | |||||
comm. | Cindy | Domenico | D | ||
cor. | Thomas | Faure | D | ||
da | Stan | Garnett | D | NO/YES | no on personal, yes on business |
clerk | Hillary | Hall | D | ||
comm | Ben | Pearlman | D | ||
shrf | Joe | Pelle | D | ||
ass. | Jerry | Roberts | D | ||
comm. | Will | Toor | D | T/C | thinks all online purchases charged tax |
City of Boulder | |||||
Suzy | Ageton | NO | |||
Matt | Appelbaum | ||||
KC | Becker | NO | will comply going forward | ||
Macon | Cowles | ||||
Crystal | Gray | T/C | all online purchases charged tax | ||
George | Karakehian | ||||
Lisa | Morzel | T/C | all online purchases are local | ||
Susan | Osborne | ||||
Ken | Wilson | ||||
mgr | Jane | Brautigam | T/C | only online purchase was from a local store |
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: harrydoby
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: ParkHill
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: bullshit!
IN: Colorado’s New Gun Law Is Great If You Know What It Actually Does
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Bennet Launches Campaign for Governor as Salazar Ponders
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
but I think “does not order online” should disqualify you from holding public office.
Look how those fools in Washington talking about the internets (GW?) and it works on “tubes or something” do.
I also wonder how many of the out of the Front Range legislators go get their emissions checked? If you live out of the emissions zone but work within it, you are supposed to get it done. (Although there isn’t any penalty if your car fails as far as I can see.)
It’s a state law, legislators!
Our legislature is supposed to represent all of us across all of its members. And there is a subset of people in this state who do not order online, nor do much of anything online. It’s important to have that point of view in the legislature so that that demographic is not left out.
That is so true!
Out of 100 legislators, at least one should be autistic, 14 should be functionally illiterate, 12 should be heavy consumers of pornography, and three should have spent time in prison. There can be some overlap between the categories.
I take the over on the remaining categories
We can throw straw man arguments back and forth all day. You clearly disagree but I see value in having a legislature that reflects the people of the state. I’m going to disagree with many at times, but that’s what you get with a democracy.
At least eight of the 100 legislators would have to be straw men, to represent that subset of people in this state.
A statement I heard as a kid has always stuck with me – “criticizing other people for not doing things is easy, doing them yourself is hard.” In the case of following the law, David is now putting a major emphasis on determining whether certain people have followed a law in a way that most people have no earthly idea applies to them. Sounds simple and reasonable – no?
So I wrote David a letter asking if he has followed every federal state and local law in the past three years. Letter follows:
I speed. And I am delinquent on getting my use taxes paid (but will have that paid in the next 2 – 3 weeks).
But you are throwing up a straw man argument. One of the laws just passed was to make Internet stores report sales because people are not paying the use tax. So the law passed is to address the specific question I am asking.
A bit sensitive about this are we?
Although if the language I used above sounds like a straw man or sounds particularly sensitive, I admit to having plagiarized most of it.
Of course its fair to ask public officials to follow the laws they write. If you simply wanted a pledge that now that this practice has been called to people’s attention that they be sure to file their taxes from now on, that seems right on.
But the tone above insinuates that choosing to focus more on compliance with a law not many people know about is some grand act of hypocrisy unless the public officials knew better than anyone else about the law the whole time. It’s great to hold public officials to the same standard as the rest of us, and in many ways we hold them to a higher standard. But they’re still human. They still don’t know about many things that 98% of the rest of us don’t know about either. And the mocking tone above and the related “gotcha” attempt is something a little less than encouraging great leadership.
But I do find it surprising that when this became a hot bill, that they didn’t right then get caught up.
I also took this tack because many of the supporters discussed this as people should have been filing and we needed the bill because people were not doing the right thing.
But point taken. I will be more understanding on the point that most people didn’t even know of this requirement, including our legislators. I do plan to write more on this, including an article for HuffPo.
because its definitely easier to criticize someone anonymously on the internet than… well.. just about anything.
Anyway, I know more about this now from your diary alone than I ever did before, so thanks in any event.
So thanks back at ya.
Is this a tax that should have been collected upon purchase or what am I missing?
Sorry if you’ve gone over this and I missed it. Thanks.
It’s got a lot of people confused, including some legislators.