(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(D) Julie Gonzales
(R) Mark Baisley
80%
20%↓
10%
(D) Jena Griswold
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Hetal Doshi
40%
30%↑
30%
(D) Jeff Bridges
(R) Kevin Grantham
80%↑
20%↓
(D) Diana DeGette*
(D) Milat Kiros
(D) Wanda James
60%↓
30%↑
10%↓
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Dwayne Romero(D) Alex Kelloff
50%↓
35%↑
30%↓
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) E. Laubacher
80%
20%
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Jessica Killin
53%↓
48%↑
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Mel Tewahade
90%
2%
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) A. Capobianco
90%
2%
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Shannon Bird
(D) Manny Rutinel
45%↓
30%↑
30%↓
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
( – promoted by Colorado Pols)
A federal court case against a Deputy District Attorney in Greeley who reviewed and approved a search warrant in a criminal libel case alleging that an online parody of a professor was illegal will move forward due to a ruling by the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals today.
The court held that prosecutors are liable for money damages if they are involved in issuing search warrants for criminal libel cases involving communications that are protected by a clearly established free speech right under the U.S. Constitution. This includes a broad protection for parodies such as the one in question here. (Colorado’s criminal libel statute remains constitutional in the proper circumstances, however.)
Calls to invoke Colorado’s criminal libel statute come up almost every election season and are usually ignored by prosecutors. This decision gives prosecutors one more reason to say no to requests to bring these kinds of charges.
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Comments