( – promoted by Colorado Pols)
According to http://www.9news.com/news/arti…
None of the amendments – 60, 61, 101, 62 or 63 – show more than 15 percent support
The poll does show a lot of people undecided, but every measure would need almost every undecided voter in order to pass.
Amendment 60: 10% support, 48% oppose, 42% und
Amendment 61: 10% support, 49% oppose, 40% und
Prop 101: 12% support, 44% oppose, 44% und
Amendment 62: 15% support, 35% oppose, 50% und
Amendment 63: 10% support, 19% oppose, 71% und
The large number of undecided, especially for the last two amendments, seems odd. Most people have fairly firm views regarding abortion, and 62’s predecessor, Amendment 48 in 2008, lost on a 2-1 margin the last time.
It’s also interesting just how many undecided there were with 63 – I’m wondering if people just don’t know what it does, or if the Independence Institute is way-overestimating its chances.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Who Will Win the Republican Vacancy Appointment in CO-04?
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Who Will Win the Republican Vacancy Appointment in CO-04?
BY: Gilpin Guy
IN: Who Will Win the Republican Vacancy Appointment in CO-04?
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Who Will Win the Republican Vacancy Appointment in CO-04?
BY: NOV GOP meltdown
IN: It’s Official: Colorado Republicans Need A New Lawyer
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: davebarnes
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Get More Smarter on Thursday (March 28)
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Yes, Please: Guns Out Of The State Capitol
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
is waiting for Glenn Beck to tell him how to vote.
I find it sad that with voting starting next week, 40% of voters are undecided.
Does this portend a very low turnout election?
For the masses:
http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/in…
except for Hick.
The diary is about “numbered amendments.”
Start your own thread.
which of course was the subject of my comment.
lead to another chance to shill for Republicans.
sworn you were an illiterate cocksucker
with Ken Buck’s dick in my mouth.
I also understand the difference between “could of” and “could have.”
In addition, when challenged on the assumptions that lead to my reasoning, I will back up those assumptions with logic, instead of mumbling “Nah, Nah, Nah I can’t hear you over the sound of Ken Buck’s balls smacking my chin.”
mental challenge with you a fair fight.
You can continue with your foul language if you must and if the editors continue to permit the same and I will continue bringing good tidings and cheer about your next Senator.
Let’s make this a battle of wits instead of insults. Answer two questions.
1) You’ve claimed it’s unfair to label opposition to the “ground zero mosque” as bigotry. You say we should respect the feelings of the families of the 9/11 victims.
How is those families’ opposition to the free expression of religious rights of Muslims who renounce terrorism and promote interfaith dialogue simply because they share the same religion of murderous fanatics not bigotry?
2) In deflecting Ken Buck’s extreme anti-choice views, you’ve repeatedly claimed “A single Senator cannot overturn Roe v. Wade” as if that were the only cogent point for issues of choice in a Senatorial campaign.
Given that health insurance coverage for abortion was a controversial issue in the Health Care Reform debate, and will remain so during its implementation, and that the Senate currently has before it pending legislation which would extend the right to military women serving overseas to procure abortions at military hospitals, should women who consider abortion rights to be an important issue be concerned about Ken Buck’s extreme views which would seek to impose his religious doctrine on women of all or no faith?
Failure to engage these questions (which has been your position for months) will be met by the sound of Ken Buck’s balls slapping your chin in my sig line.
Illiterate? Ok. But….
to lecture about “class” H-man.
Maybe OneBigRepublican.
… and I think Ruben Sierra could’be been one of the greatest players in his generation if he’d been born with the brains God gives to every squirrel.
No, this isn’t a tangential excuse to chat about something different – right, H? I mean, they did say “9”
9 news should ask for heir money back on this poll. There aren’t 40%+ undecided. This is a badly worded question on a poorly constructed robopoll. This is like please tell me are you going to have a sandwich for lunch today — yes, no, or undecided? Wow 40% are undecided about their lunch choice.
Let’s not just take as fact every crappy poll that comes down the pipe…
before I condemn them.
The partial wording with ellipses shown on the 9News site talls me nothing about what was actually asked.
When polling on ballot questions, the devil is in the details of the wording.
It was “are you CERTAIN to vote yes/no?”
This is the only numbered ballot initiative that I could see winning this year, but given its late start and the fact that there is a price tag attached to it, it is hard to tell how it will be seen by voters.
How is someone waiting for their hearing, not to mention their trial, who can’t afford bail, going to keep their job?
And a home breaker. How is someone without a job going to pay the rent/mortgage?
And patently antithetical to “innocent until proven….”
And if the incarcerated is untimately found innocent or the case is dismissed? What the fuck were we doing, making them rot in jail for weeks, perhaps months?
It’s an odious subsidy for (out-of-state headquartered) Allegheny Casualty International Fidelity Associated Bond and for Bail USA, and it’s the work of Americans for the Preservation of Bail, lobbyists and PR hacks for the industry.
so who cares what a commie slut like you thinks!