CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
November 10, 2010 10:27 PM UTC

The Debut of The 2012 Big Line

  • 37 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

Barring something strange happening, the 2012 election cycle will be the first since 2000 that Colorado has not had an election for either U.S. Senate or Governor. That’s bad news for TV stations in Colorado, and it makes The Big Line a little less interesting.

Fortunately for political junkies, we have redistricting! There are a lot of congressional seats that could look a lot different in 2012, which makes it tough to try to predict what might happen in the jockeying for position. Come 2012, will Democrats be more or less interested in challenging incumbents in CD-3 or CD-4? Could CD-2 become just competitive enough that a Republican might consider challenging incumbent Rep. Jared Polis?

Because of the uncertainty surrounding redistricting, for the first time in the history of The Big Line we’ve included all 7 of Colorado’s congressional districts. There’s little chance that all 7 will be competitive in 2012, but until the boundaries are re-drawn, it’s hard to say which among those 7 will be the ones to watch.

Comments

37 thoughts on “The Debut of The 2012 Big Line

    1. As we wrote above, it’s hard to say what these races might look like until redistricting is complete. But as the districts are currently constituted, a Democrat isn’t winning in CD-5 any more than a Republican is winning in CD-1. Doug Lamborn by himself isn’t unbeatable, but Doug Lamborn the Republican incumbent in a 2-to-1 Republican district is all but untouchable.  

      1. getting solid advice on finance rules in suburban City Council campaigns. And who, on either side of the aisle, doesn’t know how badly Ed would crush Maes? Or maybe cartwheel right over him?

  1. What if, what if, what if Lady Di were deprived of a giant majority of Dem voters?  Would people howl if Denver were split up, or would they appreciate the Dem voters being spread around the metro area more?

    1. Sure, we could move a chunk of those Dems down to Arapahoe and Douglas counties. Even El Paso county!  HD 1 will look like a tiny little pinpoint in central Denver with long blobby tentacles reaching south and southeast.  Cool looking, but probably won’t happen.  

      1. is only 566k.  Leaving Denver intact has a certain logic, but wastes Democrat votes.  So pile on a heavily Republican 150k or so from the Burbs.  The Denver-Douglas County barbell, anyone? Push enough marbles through the tubes and you can unite the City of Boulder with northern Boulder County in the 4th CD.  Or maybe put Pueblo in the fourth,

         Hey, if the Ds had won one more house seat, you would have seen some very creative engineering to create a permanent 4-3 majority or maybe even 5-2. As it is, I expect the current court-ordered blend to survive with minor changes — possiubly after another deadlock and court actions.  

  2. they are not official but shold be close enough to get the general gist.

    My ideal (which both sides would hate!):

    CD1: Denver and Greenwood Village

    CD2: Boulder, Broomfield and Weld

    CD3: the remainder of western and southern Colorado

    CD4: Adams, Larimer, and eastern plains

    CD5: Pueblo and El Paso (that should set off some fireworks)

    CD6: Douglas & remainder of Adams (Aurora moderating Douglas Co)

    CD7: Jefferson, Park, and Clear Crrek.

    By my count, 1 solid Dem (1), 1 Dem leaning (2), 1 solid GOP (3), 1 GOP leaning (5), and 3 toss ups (4, 6, and 7).

    The true joy is only one county gets split up (Arap)

    1. would be a really obvious and weird discontinuity. On the other hand, Weld is the bane of every Dem forced to campaign there– just Democratic enough to raise hopes, but in the end a winning campaign loses Weld by as little as possible.  Why land that in poor Polis’ lap?

    2. would be Republican forever, putting both under solid GOP.

      Pueblo and the Springs hate each other’s guts and would be a terrible fit. Community of interest? Hah! The Springs is considerably larger than Pueblo, thus ensuring Lamborn or someone like him forever.

      Keep Pueblo in the 3rd to counteract crazy Mesa County and you have a competitive district, provided the Democrat is a bit on the conservative side. Take Pueblo out and it’s Republican for life.

  3. Senate: of the 7 term limited seats, all but 2 are held by Dems and most are in contentious areas. It will be a tall order for them to hold them all. Reapportionment could help but only if heavily favorable to D’s

    House: More promising for D’s, but again all comes down to reapportionment.

    Saving grace: we seem to have a sequel to the “House Crazies” which could paint the GOP very unfavorably to voters.

  4. Impossible he wins, Frazier was much more electable. But he should be added to the board.

    And I think Coffman may want to run for Gov in 2014 instead of Senator.  

    1. He needs to make some money, and Congress pays double what the Governor makes every year. That’s a big consideration.

      Besides, would you rather run against Mark Udall or John Hickenlooper? Assuming both run for re-election, Udall is probably the preferable opponent.

      From a fundraising perspective alone, Hickenlooper is a problem for any Republican. It’s no secret that many of the big traditional GOP donors are friendly with Hickenlooper and supported him early in the race; unless Hick does something to really anger that group, they’re almost certain to support him again, which is a huge consideration given the low contribution limits for Governor. A lot can change in four years, but we’d guess that there won’t be a lot of top-tier Republican candidates who will be anxious to challenge Hickenlooper.

       

      1. he’s bound to do something, unlike Ritter, and therefore people will be angry. He had republican support because it was an anti-republican vote. Everyone was mad at Tom, Dan, and Dick. And if you think Coffman is in it for the money, I’m guessing you’ve never met him.

        Plus, Hickenlooper can screw him in re-districting. Coffman is loved by the establishment, and tea party. He also isn’t a guy that has gaffes. Udall will be an easier target, but who else can take on Hickenlooper? And if Obama is defeated and the public does like what Republicans are doing in Washington, then that still takes an effect on Hickenlooper (less than Udall of course).

    1. Perhaps he’ll get the itch to get back into politics after a few months, but we’d be shocked if he did anything other than just go back to his farm.  

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

197 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!