CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
June 01, 2011 08:24 PM UTC

New Video Aims to Spark Conversation on State Budget

  • 26 Comments
  • by: TheBell

( – promoted by Colorado Pols)

Colorado’s budget. It’s about time for some adult conversation.

After three years of cutbacks, cutting funds for K-12 and higher education, closing state parks and a prison, more people than ever are asking questions about state finances and our fiscal challenges.

Seems like the perfect time for video offering a simple (maybe even entertaining) overview of Colorado’s budget …

… And that’s the thinking behind Colorado’s Budget: In Plain Talk, produced by the Bell Policy Center and ProgressNow Colorado. It’s a six-minute video that uses broad strokes to paint a picture of how the state gets and spends its money.

We think that’s what Coloradans are hungry for right now — a basic understanding of the budget. That’s the first step. After that, conversations can start.

Those conversations are important. In Colorado, it is voters, not legislators, who make the major decisions about taxes and fiscal policy. Our state constitution requires it.

So, we invite Coloradans to watch Colorado’s Budget: In Plain Talk, and then, let the conversations begin.

And there is another tool out there for learning about the budget, where we are as a state and where we could be headed —  www.boomorbustcolorado.com. The site offers more detailed information about a variety of issues affected by the state’s fiscal problems. Check it out.

Comments

26 thoughts on “New Video Aims to Spark Conversation on State Budget

  1. in calling for Coloradans to have an “adult conversation” while simultaneously posting an animated, cartoon video as the starting point?  

      1. But if I wanted to, I could be as big an asshole as you are!

        Feel better? With your persuasion powers, selling this regressive job destroying tax increase should be no prob. None at all.

          1. Meaning they tend to target lower income earners for a higher percentage of their income, due to spending and saving habits of low vs. high income earners.

            In short, Sen. Heath proposed a tax increase that hits the poor hardest. In this regard the other proposal from the liberal fiscal policy thinktank was less severe, although it was so much worse on wealthy earners that it would have been far worse for the economy in general.

            1. You’re for progressive taxation?

              No flat tax for you? Eliminate sales tax and just tax income with a progressive tax?

              Congrats. I think you’re the first conservative I’ve ever encountered who supported progressive taxation.

    1. If you’re serious, you will either address the issue or admit you don’t know.  The last two times it came up, you ignored the question.

  2. I like animations.

    I like simplified, accurate, presentations f complicated material.

    But I don’t own a cowboy hat.  I am not especially enamored of Colorado’s mythical wild west past (see esp Ludlow, Sand Creek, and all the anti-gov’t federally subsidized ranchers and extractors and military camp whores followers).

    Amendment 23 is no longer any part of the problem since the legislature has determined that they can reduce education funding anyway.

    1. What do you propose a private entity might want to fund itself?  And, if you simply propose that a whole bunch of citizens get together and form an association to get something done, please distinguish this from having the government do it…

  3. Efficient, effective education is valuable. Consumers would purchase education absent government.

    The Fed and State is not an effective tool for delivering education.

    At minimum, move education to County level.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

106 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!