CO-04 (Special Election)
See Full Big Line
(R) Greg Lopez
(R) Trisha Calvarese
90%
10%
President (To Win Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Biden*
(R) Donald Trump
80%
20%↓
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
90%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
90%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(D) Adam Frisch
(R) Jeff Hurd
(R) Ron Hanks
40%
30%
20%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert
(R) Deborah Flora
(R) J. Sonnenberg
30%↑
15%↑
10%↓
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Dave Williams
(R) Jeff Crank
50%↓
50%↑
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
90%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) Brittany Pettersen
85%↑
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(R) Gabe Evans
(R) Janak Joshi
60%↑
35%↓
30%↑
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
June 16, 2011 08:41 PM UTC
26 Comments
Loading ...
.
why did she ever agree to appear in the ad ?
.
You can’t think she did or you are seriously limited in your knowledge of video editing techniques. Hell we can cut and insert a sound bite on my husbands computer editing equipment into a video produced from another source.
Janice Hahn is expected to win – I just hope she’s as good a Representative as Jane Harman her predecessor.
It’s Barron.
You need to understand his sense of humor.
Oh boy…
It looked like her
If you don’t like a candidate, fund an outrageous ad FOR them?
So THAT’S what happened to Chris Romer!
Seriously, though, I don’t know Craig Huey could have condemned it any more explicitly. Isn’t it possible that voters will be smart enough to know the difference?
But considering the long history of independent expenditure ads (now freed up to directly target political opponents or bolster campaigns), there will be a non-zero percentage of voters who will connect “GOP supporting PAC” and “GOP candidate” regardless of any denials.
Which in a way is a Good Thing™. Otherwise candidates can just dump off (through indirect means, of course) all of their negative attacks to independent groups and claim that they’re running a clean campaign.
PS – it would be another thing entirely if this was a ploy by a left-leaning group to make Huey look bad; that kind of stuff backfires, and voters will notice.
I’d love to get a link or reference to the ad you think is worse than this!
1) why on earth would those two gentlemen even agree to participate in such a racist ad?
2) why is Anthony weiner’s cock shot portrayed as one of the ‘gangstas” in Washington? (soooo many jokes)
Yeah…I caught that.
they appear to want cash.
for not the worst. Maine and I want to see your links.
More like lamest.
I think Jesse Helms’ Hands ad still wins. This one is just stupid.
Though I would argue that this new one is amazingly offensive to every demographic.
Reminded me of http://www.southparkstudios.co…
Can we assume that it’s only an online ad and that no cable or network station would actually run it (or a shortened version)?
Still, for combination of racism, over the top disgusting language and images and low production values, I’m sticking with the new entry. My worst vote stands. Matter of taste, I guess.
but it’s gone too far over the top to be taken seriously by anyone.
(I actually busted out laughing at the “So suck it, McCain-Feingold”)
The following ad was intended to be taken seriously and was seriously damaging:
In fact, many of the other ads from the Bush side in this campaign (e.g., Dukakis on the rape of his wife) were right at this level too. Fucking Roger Ailes . . .
in my “worst” judgement.
The very first time I saw the ad I thought it was a not-so well done UN bike conspiracy copycat.
Anyway, now I have the “song” stuck in head. Super great.
That’s not nearly as bad as this one.
Especially if you put them in context. He was running from the South in the late ’60’s. And though we all know exactly where he stood, he only hinted at it in this ad.
On the other hand, this new ad is 21st century SoCal. It’s blunt, crude and poorly produced.
Don’t get me wrong. The Wallace one was bad (you could argue it’s worse since it probably got more marketshare), but this new ad is way past Wallace.
Just, wow.
Whoever paid for this just gave her a whole lot of free publicity and angry backlash to piggy-back on.
I get that a “conservative filmmaker” is the ultimate malevolent force being the steaming pile of crap, but who literally spent the 15 minutes in iMovie making this thing?
or the Onion?
They need to work in some cracks about the holocaust for it to be truly effective.
I believe those are boy shorts.