October 18, 2011 09:22 PM UTC

Tom Tancredo. Off The Anti-Semitic Deep End?

•  
• by: Colorado Pols

We’re a bit stunned by what former Rep. Tom Tancredo just copied and pasted to his blog–is this something he agrees with? Is he ridiculing it? We, uh, sincerely hope it’s the latter. Here is what you can read right now on Tancredo’s blog: the “obvious” nature of Occupy Wall Street.

Yes, that is what these “occupiers” are, along with Barack Obama, Eric Holder, Leon Panetta, the likes of Pelosi, Reid, and Schumer, and of course George Soros, and all their comrades. They are all the revolutionary usurpers, “the coming insurrection’s” vanguard. And their transnationalist controlled opposition, at work within the circles of conservatives, GOP presidential candidates, and the Tea Party are their accomplices, whether hoodwinked or worse.

But what good would it do to say, “We told you so?”

Look further and see what is behind them all. One more thing that we explained is being picked up by only a few: This movement is also the spawn of the wealthiest 1% – of 1% of 1% of 1% – the world’s age old, truly and megalomaniacally evil, central banking complex.

We had previously made a point, all too distinctively, that it was the Rothschild/Schiff bankers who funded George Soros and his fellow black knight on the game table, Maurice “Sustainable Development” Strong.

But do not dare to call this “the Jewish problem.” Do not go down that road or you also become America’s enemy… [Pols emphasis]

So, this movement is the ploy of the world’s biggest banksters, to rapidly foment and utilize perverse Marxist bitterness, in order to push out the lesser banksters and legitimate financiers and “capitalists” – all in order to yes, control the world.

To be clear, it doesn’t look like Tancredo actually wrote this–it’s a post copied in its entirety to Tancredo Radio from a blog called Gulag Bound (which, be assured, we’ve never heard of, but clearly sits on the fringe right wing of the blogosphere). We have trouble believing that Tancredo, as far out as he proudly is, would approvingly cite–or at least fail to make clear he does not approve of–what seems to be a straight-up anti-Semitic conspiracy theory freakout.

But that seems to be the case, folks. Say it ain’t so, Tom–note we have taken screenshots.