Coors Takes Compelling “Not a Beer” Message To Prime Time

We’re flattered to think that Time Magazine’s Michael Sherer is a reader:


The problem with the Not-A strategy is that it raises all sorts of questions. Did you see that thing he did with his fingers, for instance? Looked like magical powers to me. But you’ll notice, he did not deny that he is a witch…

Complications aside, let’s hope this trend really catches on in 2012. Barack Obama can do the “I’m not a Muslim” spot. Mitt Romney could do the “I’m not Scrooge McDuck.” Joe Biden could do “I do not own a Trans Am.” John Boehner could do “I’m not always crying.”

Like we said when the radio spot debuted, in Joe Coors’ case, the need to establish he’s “not a beer” is arguably necessary. Says Lynn Bartels of the Denver paper, $400,000 necessary!

Like Christine O’Donnell and the witch thing, maybe he just really wants you to know.


Full story: Coors Takes Compelling “Not a Beer” Message To Prime Time

23 Community Comments, Facebook Comments

  1. JeffcoBlueJeffcoBlue says:

    Pete sure has aged since that DUI.

    Oh, wait, sorry!

  2. Half Glass FullHalf Glass Full says:

    OK, time for some sleuthing: which brand of beer, exactly, did they use for that commercial? Was it a Coors? Or was it, as rumors now suggest, a … STELLA ARTOIS?

  3. ProgressiveCowgirlProgressiveCowgirl says:

    “I’m not remotely electable.”

    Coors has perhaps found the one swing district in the country that no amount of money, whether his or from PACs, can buy. What a tragedy, to be richer than God and still unable to buy yourself a seat in Congress! He’s so put-upon.

    Meanwhile, Perlmutter doesn’t need to tell anyone what he’s not… his country club president opponent, who has about as much flavor as the beer that said opponent is so certain he’s not, is doing a great job of representing everything Perlmutter’s not. Perlmutter’s not bland, disconnected, vacuous, entitled, or inaccessible to voters.

  4. Half Glass FullHalf Glass Full says:

    Sorry Joe, I really don’t think any of your would-be constituents are going around saying, “Gee, I wonder if Joe Coors is actually a beer?”

    We also don’t believe that you can snap your fingers and make a 6-foot-tall glass of beer magically disappear. Or balance the budget without raising taxes, for that matter.

  5. DavidThi808DavidThi808 says:

    Is that Coors has a campaign team happy to tell him what he wants to hear as they collect their checks.

  6. droll says:

    Coors is a beer, right?

    (I see this backfiring in so many ways.)

  7. MADCO says:

    that Christine actually could be a beer?  And Mr Coors could be a witch?  Does he float?

  8. baaramewe says:

    I chuckled when Pols initially wrote how, “Coors is not a beer,” but give it up already.

    First, Coors is using his message frame when he refers to him “not being as beer.” Christine had to get out of her message box to address her “not being a witch.”

    Second, people like beer. It taste good. It’s middle class. Witches are not. The message isn’t bad, though it addresses his wealth as a Coors, that won’t come up in peoples minds first.



    Is Coors going to lose? Yes.

    Is Coors going to be a more formidable opponent then in recent years? Yes.

    Can Coors have his businessman corporate elitist played against him? Yes.

    But at the end of the day, the messenger is credible to working and middle income Coloradoan’s. And associating his message with Christine’s isn’t a fair comparison.  

  9. AmyCO says:

    He’s talking about serious stuff — the deficit, etc. and lightens it up with the beer reference.  I think the best part of the ad, however, is that he doesn’t mention who he’s running against.  I asked my politically non-engaged spouse if he was aware of who Coors was running against.  He had no idea.  Perlmutter is a great representative of his district and will be hard to beat.  If Joe Coors can establish credibility and name recognition (separate and apart from the relationship to beer) without having to explain why he’s better than his opponent or why his opponent should be sent home, I think he stands a shot at being a serious candidate.

    • ArapaGOPArapaGOP says:

      I think it’s a great ad. Pols attacks the “not a beer” line when it’s actually funny and disarming. Pols needs to learn that not everyone is a jaded political hack like he/they is/are.

    • harrydobyharrydoby says:

      It’s ok with me if Joe Coors wants to spend money trying to convince people he doesn’t have anything to do with the Coors beer business.

      Kinda goes along with his image as a somewhat addled old guy:

      In a 2004 column in the business section of The Denver Post, columnist Al Lewis described Joe Coors, Jr. as “blinded by greed” after Lefebvre and several associates drained some $4 million from a $40 million investment fund they were given access to by Coors and one other private investor. Lefebvre had promised Coors a 75% weekly return on these funds, which Lewis said if any person claimed to be able to realize, “it’s fair to ask why they don’t already control most of the capital in North America.”

      According to Lewis, Joe Coors, Jr. even attempted to sue the investment brokerage where the funds were deposited–after that firm acted swiftly to cut off access to these funds after they became aware of the potential for fraud, saving Coors millions of dollars. Lewis said that had he been in Coors’ place, he would not have sued his broker, but “bought him a beer.”

      “Joe Coors, Jr. may call himself a victim, but this case is a story of a clueless man victimized first and foremost by his own greed,” said Kron. “No responsible businessman would ever promise a 75% weekly return on an investment, and no responsible businessman would ever believe such a grandiose claim. That Joe Coors, Jr. did believe something so ridiculous, and gave millions of dollars to a con man promising the impossible, makes it very hard to believe that Mr. Coors can responsibly make sound decisions about the nation’s finances.”

      • ArapaGOPArapaGOP says:

        If I can’t link to Colorado Peak Politics, why the hell do you get to link to Progress Now, the nastiest most biased liberal attack group in Colorado?

        Fair is fair. Find a “credible source.”

        • droll says:

          http://www.bizjournals.com/den

          I suppose there could be another explanation for a grown up buying into a 75% weekly return that doesn’t include a stunning lack of common sense or so much greed that all common sense is blinded by dollar signs, but it’s a little vague on what that might be. Suggestions?

          Meanwhile, do Congressmen often receive invitations to help widows in war torn countries transfer their family fortunes? There’s only a small fee he has to cover up front, then… millions! Bye, bye, deficit. Coors, not a beer, for Congress 2012!!!

        • Ralphie says:

          When do you plan to answer it?

        • ajb says:

          You’ll find that ThinkProgress sources their material using reliable news sources. Personally, I try to link to the original source, and I’ve found that TP always provides that. CPP? Not so much. If they cite, they frequently cite opinion pieces as fact.

        • harrydobyharrydoby says:

          But Droll’s link to http://www.bizjournals.com laid out the facts pretty thoroughly (and in total agreement with TP’s summary).

          So, any arguments with the general facts?  

          Or is your complaint simply that the best you can do for CD7 is to get a millionaire idiot to run on the GOP ticket these days?

          (I guess they didn’t break the mold after GW Bush left office after all)

Leave a Reply

Comment from your Facebook account


You may comment with your Colorado Pols account above (click here to register), or via Facebook below.