In My Spare Time, I’m Into Golf and Prophesying and Stuff

Republican congressional candidate Joe “Not a Beer” Coors has a new ad on television that shows him driving in a car and only kinda watching the road. But nevermind all that, because we’ll never be able to picture Coors in any other way after re-reading this article from The Los Angeles Times.

On Sept. 18, 1988, the Times ran a long profile story on the Coors family titled “Brewing Controversy: Coors Clan: Doing it Their Way.” Featured in the story, of course, is the then 45-year-old Joe Coors, Jr., who comes off as…well…see for yourself:

All five of Joe Coors’ sons, inspired by their mother, Holly, 67, are self-described, “born-again” Christian fundamentalists. Hard core.

The oldest son, Joe Jr., 45, for instance, even lists “Biblical Prophecy” as a hobby, along with golf, on his company resume, and the whole family is awaiting Armageddon, which Joe Jr. believes will occur around the year 2,000.

We know what you’re thinking: Did I just read that correctly?

You did, but here it is again:

The oldest son, Joe Jr., 45, for instance, even lists “Biblical Prophecy” as a hobby, along with golf, on his company resume, and the whole family is awaiting Armageddon, which Joe Jr. believes will occur around the year 2,000.

We were skeptical about recent news from the Coors campaign touting a 9-point lead over incumbent Democratic Rep. Ed Perlmutter, but perhaps it wasn’t polling — maybe ol’ “Not a Beer” was prophesying and God told him that he had a big lead in the polls.

Perhaps Coors’ prophesying on the 2012 election will be more accurate than his prediction that the world would end in the year 2000. He better hurry up and get elected just in case the Mayans are correct and the world ends in December. Joe Coors may be “Not a Beer,” but there’s also a decent chance that he’s “Not All There.”


Full story: In My Spare Time, I’m Into Golf and Prophesying and Stuff

36 Community Comments, Facebook Comments

  1. Diogenesdemar says:

    the electoral keys to the White House in 2000, but I personally think Joe probably just made a lucky guess . . .

  2. sxp151 says:

    it would be unfair to use it against him on Saturday. The standards for whackjobbery are just different for the Romney-Ryan party.

  3. parsingreality says:

    ….are essentially extra-Biblical movements that have come about over the last 100 years or so.  It’s reading Revelations – which reads like John, the putative author was on damned fine acid – and then the modern reader on acid.

    As the Christian literary canon was being agreed upon, an almost 500 year process, Revelations almost did not make the cut. It was, to quote one of the early church fathers involved in the selection process, “Too fucking weird.”

    Not only that, but the whole book is made null and void in the first several lines:  Rev. 1:1,

    The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place.

    And Rev. 1:3

    Blessed is the one who reads aloud the words of this prophecy, and blessed are those who hear it and take to heart what is written in it, because the time is near.

    As almost exactly 2000 years have passed since this was written, and nothing has happened, despite being told the shit’s gonna hit the Armageddon fan imminantly, nada.  Why would any of the rest of it be true?

    And check out ole Joe’s accuracy. “Around the year 2000.”  Well, that millennial Jesus will return New Year’s Eve stuff worked out great, didn’t it? Never mind that Jesus used the Hebrew calendar, the Roman empire used the Julian, and only now as we count off our fingers, the Gregorian.  Hell, might as well throw in the Mayan.

    I would ask any Christian who is “into” prophesy, “Why?”  Why does it matter when and how?  If you’re good with your gods, so what?

  4. ProgressiveCowgirlProgressiveCowgirl says:

    And he’s AWARE of how Ed took Frazier apart into shiny little pieces.

    Dudes, we KNEW this guy was crazy, there are no surprises.

  5. VoyageurVoyageur says:

    Frankly, I’m not sure than an all powerful creator would share humankind’s fascination with round numbers, especially as they relate to a “year” that consists of the circuit of one planet around one star out of the billions of planets and stars created by the aforementioned Supreme Being.  After all, a billion years could be but a second in the mind of G-d or vice versa.

      But to play the Coors game: Why would the counting start with Jesus’s birth?  There is nothing remarkable about his being born.  Everyone manages that.  The exceptional event to Christians is not the birth of Jesus but the resurrection of Jesus.   If he were to come back in one or two millenia, then the most likely times would be about 1,038 or 2,038.

       The best guess is that Jesus of Nazareth was born in 5 “B.C.”  There are no secular records of such a birth, but the scriptures place it in the time of Herod the Great, who died in 4 B.C.E.  (Before Common Era, the term scholars use in lieu of “Before Christ.”)

      The Bible is silent as to the date or year, though it is a safe bet it was NOT on December 25, which at that time was the Roman Saturnalia, which marked the solstice — an event, due to Calendar Drift, which now falls on Dec. 21.)

     Likewise, Jesus was about 30 when he began his ministry and was killed, most brutally, as was the Roman way with Jewish troublemakers, when he was 32 or, more likely, 33.

       That means his resurrection, if it occurred, was likely in year 38 of the Common Era.

       The Bible records just three resurrections: those of Elijah, Jesus and Lazarus.  Lazarus can perhaps be discounted as simply the work of Jesus, but Jesus’s own resurrection would have been such an astounding event — one of only two such recorded in the Bible — that it would be a much more significant date from which to begin calculating his return.

        So, if we’re starting a pool as to when Jesus returns, I’ll pick 2038.   Since I’ll be 93 that year, I’m not certain to make it.  But if it happens, I hope the surviving polsters will gather and toast the Lord’s return with a Pabst Blue Ribbon, in my memory.

  6. ClubTwittyClubTwitty says:

    To save A-Bot the trouble I want to point out how grossly over the top this is and inaccurate to boot.  

    Everyone knows that one does not put a pointy protrusion on an AFDB which messes with the psytronics.  http://zapatopi.net/afdb/#WHAT  

  7. ArapaGOPArapaGOP says:

    Your selective cut and paste of a 25 year old story (!) is going to SINK Joe. I’m going to go cry in my Cheerios.

    HAHAHAHA Nobody cares, except the religious people you’re offending.

    • parsingreality says:

      So, Mr. Church Goer, how do you reconcile the social teachings of Jesus with your political/social beliefs?

      There are a hell of a lot of atheists and agnostics who appear to be better Christians than you.

      I am SO tired of the fable that we need to respect religions. Especially when said religions are nothing more than fairy tales, justify wars, and cause dissension.

      A pox on you and your ilk.

    • sxp151 says:

      that makes it OK to say the world is going to end in the year 2000. Please do blockquote the whole thing that makes it sound perfectly reasonable.

  8. Old Time Dem says:

    He was only 45 at the time of the article.  I’m sure many of us believed weird things when we were young.

Leave a Reply

Comment from your Facebook account


You may comment with your Colorado Pols account above (click here to register), or via Facebook below.