Open Line Friday!

“If the final week poll has Obama winning by ten in Ohio and Romney wins it, you got riots. If the polls tighten and they get real close, then I don’t–it was a legitimate question somebody asked because these people, if they’re told, these rabid leftists, if they are told this a slam dunk and it’s over, and Romney wins this thing, it could get bloody out there.”

–Rush Limbaugh, yesterday


Full story: Open Line Friday!

108 Community Comments, Facebook Comments

    • Libertad says:

      Many give up looking?

      • raymond1 says:

        … you can’t say the answer is that EVERY month it’s just workers giving up. The real answer: we’re not in the boomiest boom every, but jobs have been added consistently for a while now.

        The last month for which we have final revised #s is March 2012, and per a 9/27/12 jobs report, average job creation for the year ending March 2012 is +194,000 a month — more than enough to yield steady drops in unemployment. Monthly reports since have been similar, with last month’s just revised upward.

        I guess it’s back to peddling racial slurs about the President for Libertad, huh?

        • Libertad says:

          Private companies accounted for most of the growth in September payrolls, adding 104,000 jobs.

          In the private sector, employment increased in health care as well as transportation and warehousing. Manufacturing employment fell by 16,000.

          Governments, meanwhile, added 10,000 positions as the federal and state-level workforces grew.

          So far this year, overall job growth has averaged 143,000 a month, compared with 153,000 in 2011.

          Average earnings rose by seven cents to $23.58 an hour, while the average workweek edged up by 0.1 hour to 34.5 hours in September.

          A broader measure of unemployment-which includes job seekers as well as those in part-time jobs–held steady at 14.7% in September.

          http://online.wsj.com/article/

          • AristotleAristotle says:

            They’re in the tank for the GOP. Always have been, always will be. Check out my link for you above for a more objective analysis.

            Bottom line: Things are getting better under Obama. Romney wants us to return to 2008.

      • AristotleAristotle says:

        http://www.cepr.net/index.php/

           The unemployment rate fell by 0.3 percentage points in September to 7.8 percent, the lowest level since January of 2009. The drop was driven by an 873,000 reported increase in employment. The employment to population ratio rose to 58.7 percent, its highest rate since May of 2010. While the establishment survey showed just 114,000 new jobs for the month, the prior two months’ numbers were revised upwardby a total of 86,000. This brings the average rate of job growth over the last three months to 146,000.

           [...] The percentage of unemployment due to quitters rose to 7.9 percent, the second highest level since the end of 2008. The number of discouraged workers also fell sharply from 1,032,000 to 802,000.

    • Gray in Mountains says:

      trick of the extreme right, make you look at something else while you steal the country

  1. MADCO says:

    Obama has overhauled the food safety system

    Advanced women’s rights in the work place

    Ended Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell (DADT) in our military

    Stopped defending DOMA in court.

    Passed the Hate Crimes bill.

    Appointed two pro-choice women to the Supreme Court.

    Expanded access to medical care and provided subsidies for people who can’t afford it.

    Expanded the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP)

    Fixed the preexisting conditions travesty [and rescissions] in health insurance.

    Invested in clean energy.

    Overhauled the credit card industry, making it much more consumer-friendly.

    While Dodd-Frank bill was weak in many respects, it was still an extremely worthwhile start at re-regulating the financial sector.

    He created a Elizabeth Warren’s dream agency: The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

    He’s done a lot for veterans

    He got help for people whose health was injured during the clean-up after the 9/11 attacks.

    http://obamaachievements.org/

    • Libertad says:

      The problem with your list is it shows zero focus on jobs, which we know is accurate.

      The President has failed to organically increase government tax revenue because his policies have deterred job creation and in many cases retarded basic efforts to create jobs.

      • Duke Coxdukeco1 says:

        keeps going down…of course.

        • raymond1 says:

          … where Obama is a Kenyan Muslim, gas is $6, and thanks to Obama the economy has collapsed from the awesome state Bush left it in.

          • Sir RobinSir Robin says:

            under Bush, and the turnaround and job gains under Obama? Thank you in advance.

            I still can’t grab an image off the internet. Care to post those instrucions again. Many thanks!

            • Libertad says:

              Latimes is source

              On Thursday afternoon, the Low-P station in Calabasas was selling regular gasoline for $5.69 a gallon in cash, or $5.79 for credit card purchases. In addition to the high prices, the pumps displayed hand-lettered signs reading: “We are sorry, it is not our fault.”

              The station, whose name is short for “low price,” is usually full of drivers attracted by the high-profile location at Calabasas Road and Parkway Calabasas, right off the 101 Freeway. But customers thinned out as prices soared.

              …. snip….

              Some drivers didn’t pick up on the price right away.

              “Holy shoot! I didn’t notice that earlier,” Aaron Belcher, 38, said as he ripped his Visa card from the reader. “This is ridiculous.”

              Tiffany Lemme, who spent $50.29 on less than nine gallons, said she was shocked on a recent trip to Miami when she paid $5.30 a gallon.

              “I thought that was crazy, but this is insane,” the 31-year-old Woodland Hills resident said.

              • Sir RobinSir Robin says:

                I just returned from a week in CA. Gas is higher there then here in CO. I paid in the high $4 range. So fuck off.

                • Fidel's dirt nap says:

                  $ 5.69 for a gallon of gas = over 6 dollars !

                  trillions in new tax cuts, more defense spending, plus I’ll balance the budget !

                • Libertad says:

                  This is an article from the LA Times … its fairly well known to be left of center.

                  And certainly the Times is not talking about stations near Napa, The Pebble Beach COuntry Club or within the confines of Disneyland.

                  But speaking of Disneyland (and I own Disney stock), your world – Obama-Bidenville – is like Disneyland. Its faries & mystical dreams, its fantacyland.

                  • ajb says:

                    “Product supply in California has tightened, especially in Southern California, due to refinery outages,” Bill Day, a Valero spokesman at the company’s headquarters in San Antonio, said by e-mail.

                    Exxon’s Torrance refinery is restoring operations after losing power Oct. 1. Phillips 66 (PSX) is scheduled to perform work on gasoline-making units at its two California refineries this month, two people with knowledge of the schedules said. A Chevron Corp. (CVX) pipeline that delivers crude to Northern California refineries was also shut last month due to elevated levels of chloride in the oil.

                    Van der Valk called the price surge a “a short-term problem.” Wholesale costs should start falling as Exxon’s refinery returns to normal operations and other plants finish maintenance.

                    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/

                    • Barron X says:

                      under Obama, the old GM went bankrupt, didn’t it ?

                      Then the federal govt stepped in and did a Bain Capital move, and gave the assets to the unions.  

                      So, no, GM isn’t alive; it’s either a “zombie GM” back from the dead, or something other than the original GM.  

                    • parsingreality says:

                      The auto industry was in deep shit before the elections.  A combination of weakining sales due to The Second Republican Great Depression, and way too many chiefs, and lots of old attitudes.

                      Obama did not pull a Bain.  Not even close.  Yes, many people holding stock lost money (All those overpaid job creators on Wall Street couldn’t see this coming?).  Bain, by their own statement, is a harvester of companies. If they would have been able to raise enough capital to control GM, they WOULD have harvested it.

                      No, Obama and his team wrought close to miracles.  The Cash for Clunkers was a bit of a start, but the total reorganization of GM was the ticket to success.  Think about this turnaround in three years.  Amazing.

                      Not a ghost/zombie GM by a long shot.  

                  • Diogenesdemar says:

                    all wanted you to fuck off back when gas was down around $2.80.

                    Maybe someone should have told you sooner, but there’s absolutely no linkage whatsoever between the price of gasoline, and the fact that everyone you encounter soon wants you to fuck off . . .  

                  • Sir RobinSir Robin says:

                    http://energyalmanac.ca.gov/ga

                    As always, you refuse to do basic elementary school research. You’re incapable of learning anything. Are you off your meds?

              • AristotleAristotle says:

                I’m not going to do your work for you. Provide the link or GTFO.

                • ajb says:

                  http://www.energyalmanac.ca.go

                  Oh wait, that must be the wrong link. It says the CA avg price for regular 2 days ago was $4.18.  

                    • Libertad says:

                      Wow! MSNBC is going to spin out of control today trying to knock down the news from the west coast.

                      http://seattletimes.com/text/2

                    • Libertad says:

                      Tiffany Lemme, who spent $50.29 on less than nine gallons, said she was shocked on a recent trip to Miami when she paid $5.30 a gallon.

                      note from the same times article

                      Then Tiffany had this to say about the California gas prices ….

                      “I thought that was crazy, but this is insane,” the San Fernando Valley resident said.

                    • AristotleAristotle says:

                      Check this out for current Miami gas prices. Note that even the high ones don’t come close to $5.30.

                      http://www.miamigasprices.com/

                      That article quotes a tourist returning home to CA from FL. And that’s ALL they report – no fact checking there. Not a surprise – I lived in Seattle and the Times has a very conservative editorial board, infamous for their distorted and contorted opinions on politics. Elections routinely go for the people the DON’T endorse. It wouldn’t surprise me that they let a whopper like that pass unchecked.

                    • AristotleAristotle says:

                      One (from your link):

                      California’s fuel industry isn’t running out of gasoline – supplies are only 2.5 percent lower than this time last year – but recent refinery and pipeline mishaps sent wholesale prices to all-time highs this week. As a result, some station owners weren’t buying fuel for fear they couldn’t sell it. Those who did buy simply kicked prices higher and bet customers would understand.

                      “If this keeps up, I’ll be looking at $5-a-gallon gas by next Thursday,” said Ali Mazarei, who owns an Arco station in Riverside County. On Thursday, Mazarei was charging $4.52 for a gallon of regular gasoline, up from $4.27 Wednesday and $4.21 Tuesday.

                      Two: $4.27 is significantly cheaper than $6.

                      Three: It hasn’t even risen above $5.

                      I know this shit excites you like porn, but like your $5 milk fantasy, it isn’t true.

      • davebarnesdavebarnes says:

        Here is what started the $6 headline.

        A single station in Calabasas, CA

        A broader look at CA, CO, TX prices shows what happens when a local refinery shuts down.

        Libby, you are a liar.

  2. Libertad says:

    Far away from Congress is the real forgotten man, the taxpayer who foots the bill. He is in a different spot from the tax-eater or the business that makes millions from spending schemes.

    He cannot afford to spend his time trying to oppose Federal expenditures. He has to earn his own living and carry the burden of taxes as well.

    But for most beneficiaries a Federal paycheck soon becomes vital in his life. He usually will spend his full energies if necessary to hang onto this income.

    The taxpayer is completely outmatched in such an unequal contest.

  3. ScottP says:

    A judge in Texas is preparing for war if Obama wins and causes civil unrest and a UN invasion.

    Limbaugh predicts riots if Romney wins.

    Republicans are lynching empty chairs to symbolize Obama.

    Romney supporters are threatening an owner of a mexican restaurant in west Denver because he didn’t want to be used as a campaign prop.

    Romney suggests that Obama sides with the terrorists that killed our Ambassador in Libya.

    Is being scared and seeing the worst in everyone a prerequisite to being Republican? Cuz apparently no matter what happens, violence will break out!

    • ClubTwittyClubTwitty says:

      Its all they have, subtle (or not so) threats of violence and mayhem.

    • VanDammerVanDammer says:

      If election in hair’s breadth close and if election improprieties happen in OH, FL, IN, VA, or any other tinderbox state then the hard Right has well prepped their loonies.

      LaPierre has his 2nd Amd idiots sitting on dry powder and plenty of shot.  Koch bros ready to airlift in legal shock troops enough to overwhelm any little clerks office, and Faux News already has the Chyron loaded with lying, inciting screen bottom scrollers.

      Hell, a Bureau of Labor Statistics report months in the making turns Zapruder inside of 6 hrs — proof enough they’ll turn any American failure or success political.  

  4. ClubTwittyClubTwitty says:

    sequester his blathering trollings in his own room?

    He can play with himself all day and not take up valuable Pols real estate.

      • Duke Coxdukeco1 says:

        that keeps buzzing around your head.

        • VoyageurVoyageur says:

          used to have a useful “ignore” button./  If you clicked it on a troll , his messages would not show on your screen.  If we had a tool like that here, we could all get rid of the tad and he and arapagop would have a wonderful time talking to each other.  Any hope of getting that feature in our software, Pols?

           {ignore doesn’t make the message vanish to anyone who doesn’t click ignore on that poster.]

          • Duke Coxdukeco1 says:

            How about it Guvs?…Pleeeze?

          • allyncooper says:

            In addition to my opposition due to free speech concerns, the entertainment value is priceless.  I say let ‘em flame on……

            • Duke Coxdukeco1 says:

              In addition to my opposition due to free speech concerns, the entertainment value is priceless.

              but the shear volume is the thing that oppresses me. Wading through post after post until you get past seven or eight is really too much. The turd takes threadjacking to a completely unacceptable level…in my view.

            • GalapagoLarryGalapagoLarry says:

              And it’s usually pretty high quality.

            • VoyageurVoyageur says:

              if dukeco clicks ignore for Libertad, then Libertad posts vanish from his screen.  But they would still be there for allyncooper if allyncooper wanted to see them.  Free speech has nothing to do with it, because Libertad is still free to post anything he wants — except for common sense, which he is incapable of.  But he just can’t compell dukeco or any other unwilling recipient to read him.  Note that all replies to Libertad would be readable by dukeco or anyone who clicked ignore.  And if you were really curious as to what prompts them, then you can unignore Libertad and read his parent post, before clicking ignore and hiding him again if you are so moved.

                Ignore is a free choice from all users.  

              • Duke Coxdukeco1 says:

                I am perfectly willing to have an ignore button next to my posts. Unlike Libertad, I don’t really care how many responses I get, or, for that matter, how many people choose to ignore me.

                If I never see another word he posts, it won’t break my heart.

          • VanDammerVanDammer says:

            ‘turd is good bizness for Pols. Masochistic ‘turd generates more postings per thread than any other GOPer. For some reason, the reasonable and sane are compelled to respond to this troll’s daily BS hash.

            How many times can a Polster call BS on this troll.

            How many responses rebutting $6/gal gas & $5/gal milk.

            How many SSDD cut & paste “snips” that say nothing.

            How many times must U requests links, sources, facts.

            Insanity = doing same thing, same way over & over expecting a different outcome.  ’turd will NOT change so why play with him?  He’s pretty much said he gets off on tracking responses to his bullshit posts.  Responding to ‘turd just gives him a woody — so do you really want to be the thing that excites him?

    • Craig says:

      You guys just don’t get it.  Ignore him.  He’ll go away.  It took me a couple of years, but engaging this lying idiot with his Republican lying talking points each morning is, well, pointless.  If you ignore him, he will go away.

      • Diogenesdemar says:

        used to tell me about the monster that lived under my bed . . .  

      • Duke Coxdukeco1 says:

        He’ll go away

        Without challenging his bullshit…we leave it out there for those who don’t know the turd to actually buy into.

        It’s sort of like the Ohio strategy that resulted from the swift-boating of John Kerry. The turd is obsessed…note the amount of time he spends on amassing his copious quantities of crap. I don’t think he will go away until the Guvs put some kind of restraint on the sheer volume of his insane drivel.

    • GalapagoLarryGalapagoLarry says:

      When I see a big box quote coming, I quickly glance at the bottom for the poster, then slide on down to the next post. Doesn’t work every time, but it sure saves a lot of disgust. (Not that I don’t have a good supply.)

  5. AristotleAristotle says:

    Mondale-Reagan in 1984.

    This is relevant for a couple of reasons. One, I believe Mondale won it, or at least delivered a very, very good point @ 5:58. (Reagan recycled his famous “there you go again” zinger earlier in the clip, around 1:45 I think, and it took a few minutes before Mondale’s turn came up.) Two, it shows how long the whole Medicare and Social Security are IN DANGER meme has been around. Very similar arguments were made in the debate the other night.

    • DaftPunkDaftPunk says:

      To reiterate the simple message:

      FREE BIRTH CONTROL REDUCES ABORTIONS!!!

      The more complex message, which is missed by the idiots who like to crow that pills are less than $10 at WalMart, or condoms are cheap (if you can make your man wear them), is that the most effective contraception is the most expensive, and cost is a significant barrier to those methods.

      Any intervention will be more successful when there is less chance for user error.  Pills must be taken every day.  Condoms must be put on correctly before the start of intercourse.  Every action required of the user is a chance to mess up.

      This is why the American Congress of Obstetrics and Gynecology has started their LARC (long acting reversible contraception) program  to raise awareness of implants and IUDs even in adolescents, and partnering with other websites to make women aware of the full range of options that are now available without copay thanks to the Affordable Care Act.

      Thanks, Obamacare!!!

    • GalapagoLarryGalapagoLarry says:

      And if you’re pro contraception, you must be  pro sex. So if you’re against abortion, you’re a horndog. Maybe righty religionists aren’t so bad after all.

  6. Libertad says:

    Assessing Obama’s performance at the debate in Denver on Wednesday, Sununu said: “What people saw last night I think was a president that revealed his incompetence, how lazy and detached he is and how he has absolutely no idea how serious the economic problems of the country are.”

    Later in the interview, Mitchell nudged Sununu to reconsider that remark.

    “Governor, I want to give you a chance to maybe take it back. Did you really mean to call Barack Obama, the president of the United States, lazy?” she asked.

    Yes,” Sununu responded. He repeated the claim and referenced a comment Obama had made earlier in the week in between debate prep sessions in Las Vegas. The president said “it’s a drag” and that his aides were “making me do my homework.”  

    Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politic

  7. Libertad says:

    The middle class has been buried for the last 4 years

    The GOP wants to put you back in chains

    You’re darn right Barack and I will raise taxes …. $1 Trillion on the wealthiest!

    Is this man sick? Barack needs to muzzle this guy, but wait, there’s a VP debate comig up in a week.

    Joe’d be smart to catch a cold 4 days beforehand, then hospitalize himself 2 days beforehand … there always a way to “skip school” if you really need to.

  8. parsingreality says:

    Anyone else notice Rmoney’s lie about gas prices being under $2 when Obama came into office?  The same talking point that Libernuts refuses to stop disseminating despite the fact that the last time gas was $1.80 (his price point) was under $2 was 2002 with GW?

    Republicans can’t win on the truth. So, lie,lie,lie, and steal the elections.

    Note to Libertad:  If I’ve not mentioned it, the last time gas was under $2/gal was under GW in 2002.  What’s that, the fourth time you’ve been informed?

    • RedGreenRedGreen says:

      Gas bottomed out at the end of the Bush administration when the economy was grinding to a halt. It rebounded to historically, inflation-adjusted norms fairly quickly once the recovery started, but Romney isn’t lying about how low prices got in late 2008 and early 2009.

      http://www.GasBuddy.com/gb_ret

      • AristotleAristotle says:

        Like parsing, I didn’t believe that when I first heard it (over a year ago IIRC), but found that it did. I honestly couldn’t remember it being less than around $2.40 after topping $4 for the first time in the summer of 2008.

        But then there was an incredible dip right around Inauguration Day, an anomaly that was quickly corrected. It made me wonder, conspiracy theory style, if the oil industry did that temporarily JUST for the purpose of creating that talking point – that gas rose by that much more since he took office. The brain dead wingnuts like to trot it out, as though this wasn’t the textbook definition of statistical anomaly.

      • parsingreality says:

        I can’t recall if the site was government or private, I lean to gummint.  It wasn’t a daily reckoning, nor graphic.  Maybe weekly.  And the lowest price it showed was about $2 in 2002.

        So, if it was much lower at the very end of GW’s reign, it was of very brief duration, I’d guess.  

        • Barron X says:

          It has weekly averages back to 1996.

          Looks like $1.78 when Obama took office.    

          • Duke Coxdukeco1 says:

            You know damned well the only leverage the POTUS has is his control of the strategic reserve, which is actually no leverage at all.

            This is price manipulation by the industry, plain and simple. They have done it before (remember Enron?) and they are doing it now. There is no shortage of oil or gasoline except as manipulated by those who, like that idiot Jack Welch, are desperately trying to find ANYTHING to beat that hated black man who has sullied our White House.

            These are the same people who are running non-stop ads trying to convince America that natural gas is a “clean” fuel…and we all know that is a bald-faced fucking lie…don’t we?

             

  9. Whiskey Lima Juliet says:

     I said it will be a cold day in hell before I fear my country.

    …business owners referenced anxiety about the federal government. Wanda James feels differently.

    “I’m a former United States Military officer. I would have died for my country. I love my country. And if this the home of the free, the home of the brave, why would I be afraid, why would I be afraid, to open up a legal business?” James said. “I’m enthused. I’m energized. I’m excited. There is a brand new industry coming, folks. A brand new industry is on the verge of coming to America and I want to be a part of it.”

    http://www.cannabiswire.com/20

    • Barron X says:

      (the question was not about fearing your country, whatever that could mean.)  

      I fear my government.

      I’ve seen up close and personal how government officials can abuse their authority for personal gain and for petty vengeance.  

      I’ve seen courts at different levels render judgments that were unjust and contrary to law.  

      I have heard from friends and neighbors of how they were abused by law enforcement officials.  

      Our federal government has started wars in order to improve the reelection prospects for Presidents.  

      Our Congress recently repudiated key elements of the Bill of Rights.  

      It is now legal for the NSA to listen to my phone calls without a warrant, for the TSA to fondle me against my will, and for the President to designate me as a target for a drone strike.  

      To me, this is not a partisan issue: governments are run by people, and people will abuse authority.  Reasonable people, ALL of us, fear government and insist on having checks on power.  

      How is it that I am the first to question WLJ on this ridiculous statement ?  

      • Duke Coxdukeco1 says:

        Our federal government has started wars in order to improve the reelection prospects for Presidents.

        Thank you, republicans.

        Our Congress recently repudiated key elements of the Bill of Rights.

        Thank you republicans.

        It is now legal for the NSA to listen to my phone calls without a warrant, for the TSA to fondle me against my will, and for the President to designate me as a target for a drone strike.  

        Thank you, republicans.

        To me, this is not a partisan issue:

        really…?

  10. Diogenesdemar says:

    selling popcorn outside the grocery stores right now?  Well, God love ‘em all — really, but my days of quietly putting up with this nonsensical crap have long since past . . .

    Almost-Eagle Scout denied award because he is gay

    Ryan Andresen had recently completed the requirements to earning his Eagle Scout award, including his final project of building a “tolerance wall” for victims of bullying like himself, but his Scoutmaster would not sign off on honoring him with the Boy Scouts’ highest ranking because he is gay, his mother said.

    And late Thursday, the Boy Scouts of America said in a statement that because of Andresen’s sexual orientation and that he did not agree to Scouting’s principle of “Duty to God,” “he is no longer eligible for membership in Scouting.” But the family on Friday disputed that, saying the only reason Andresen was denied the rank is “because the Boy Scouts of America has a problem with Ryan being gay.”

    http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_new

    . . . I’m handing copies of this article to any BSA kid or adult who tries to sell me kernels this year.

    • parsingreality says:

      The Boy Scouts came to America from Britain in 1910, IIRC.  Within a year or two the Mormon church looked at it and said, “Hey, a ready made youth program for Mormons!”  NOTE: No comment on a youth program for the other half?

      The Mormon church has been hugely influential in the national organization for a hundred years.  Every Mormon stake (church) has a troop.

      Mormon men are assigned to be scoutmasters, they have no choice.  When I worked at the BS camp in 1999, one week was all Mormon troops. I never saw such bad leadership.  The scoutmasters just didn’t care.

      If you want to look at the issue of homosexuality and Boy Scouts, look to Salt Lake City.  

    • AristotleAristotle says:

      Microwave popcorn is crap anyway. I pop mine on the stovetop.

  11. Diogenesdemar says:

    a great column — extending yesterday’s conversation . . .

    Idiot’s Delight

    You’re an undecided voter. Your time is up. The rest of us are sick of pretending to care about you, saying nice things to you, doing your damn laundry.

    Decide, O.K.? When the choice was between Scrooge McDuck and the Kenyan Socialist, you couldn’t make up your mind. Now that you know it’s between two Harvard know-it-alls, with clear, divergent views of government, you’re waiting for – what? The long-lost Mormon tablets to reappear? Donald Trump to reveal what his phantom investigators found among the birth records in Hawaii?

    . . .

    But here’s the thing: while we’re paying so much attention to you, you’re not paying that much attention to known facts about the two men who want to lead the United States. You barely keep up on the news. If you’d been paying attention, of course, you wouldn’t be undecided.

    You, most likely, were not among the millions of Americans who watched the first presidential debate. Of all voters, the undecided were the least interested in the debates, a Washington Post poll found last week.

    http://opinionator.blogs.nytim

    . . . share it with an idiot that you know.

  12. Libertad says:

    When his books went to audio, why did he deny his listeners every section of his book deal with Franck Marshall Davis?

    What is he covering up?

    Why did he censor his own work?

    What’s he hiding?

Leave a Reply

Comment from your Facebook account


You may comment with your Colorado Pols account above (click here to register), or via Facebook below.