Journalists' "likes," "friends," "retweets," etc. on social media do not reflect bias

3 Comments

by: Jason Salzman

On his profile on his Facebook page, Denver Post Politics Editor Chuck Plunkett writes:

Please note. As a journalist using social media, my following or friending or liking — and in some cases even retweeting or reposting — is not always meant as an endorsement.

This is a shorter version of a post Plunkett wrote shortly before the election on Facebook:

Friends. I’ve been asked about this a couple of times in recent days, as we are now fully in the final throes of the Election season. The question is whether as a journalist who covers politics it is correct for me to “like” the Obama page or the Romney page. (And I “like” them both.) The problem is that is how Facebook defines what you have to do to follow a page. That’s not — in most cases — how I would describe my interest. I might genuinely “like” a band, for example. But a politician? It’s not the same thing. I’d like to expand on what I have long indicated on my Facebook profile — which probably not everyone reads. For years now, since my earliest origins with Facebook, I have contained in my profile the disclaimer that as a journalist using social media I “friend” and “follow” and “subscribe” and “like” and “retweet” and etc. all manner of people, groups, media, politicians, movements, companies, nonprofits, etc. But my doing so is NOT meant as an endorsement. Rather, I do so in order to see their posts in order to watch for news and whatnot. Increasingly, politicians use social media in the place of the old-school press release or statement. To not follow risks missing something — not that I don’t miss things even when I follow, given what has become the enormous success of these kinds of sites. I hope this makes sense. Bottom line: I do not endorse any politician or political party and do not advocate for any of them either. I have much better things to do with my time.

To me, that’s common sense, but it’s good Plunkett spells it out for us.

You say, still, what if a guy like Plunkett “likes” or “friends” 100 right-wing groups and 25 lefty ones? What if he re-tweets Scott Gessler (as if Gessler doesn’t tweet his own horn often enough)? Does it mean he favors the right?

It means little or nothing. You don’t know what Plunkett is up to or where he’s getting information, unless you’re a mind reader, and mind readers are the worst kind of media critics–though they are a common kind.

Re-posting, and retweeting, even “likes,” by other public figures, like politicians, invite questions, however.

The bottom line is, for journalists, if you think they lean one way or the other, evaluate their actual factual work. Is it fair? Is it accurate?

3 thoughts on “Journalists’ “likes,” “friends,” “retweets,” etc. on social media do not reflect bias”

Pam Bennett says:

December 7, 2012 at 10:55 pm

I am careful about which politicians and people I “friend”. The same with media types. It is not so much as what they see on the pages, most of my Facebook pages are only for friends now, similar with My Space and other social sites. It is what other people see as my “friends”.

Media types and politicians have certain dances to do, many are friendly dances, a few are a tango, and then there are the dances done several feet apart. Here in DC too many of the dancers get too close and it affects their abilities to get go home to different homes.

Log in to Reply
CastleMan says:

December 7, 2012 at 11:23 pm

with Plunkett’s argument. A journalist is entitled to his or her opinions, like anyone else. The issue is whether they affect his or her work. In the journalist’s private life, he or she should feel free to vote as he or she desires and even make campaign contributions. A journalist, like a lawyer, is entitled to a public understanding that his or her job is not the same thing as his or her private life and a professional and capable journalist knows how to keep them separate and how to keep the one from affecting the other.

Log in to Reply
Diogenesdemar says:

December 8, 2012 at 9:06 am

likes girls . . . and his pet rock.

Too bad the world’s gonna end about five years before this kind of junk becomes passГ© . . .

In the meanwhile, I’ll be scouring the intertubes to find one or two of those Bronco Bama Darter Beanie Baby . . . (I’m told an unnamed local beer magnate family member is willing to invest billions to corner the market on these babies . . . true story, I heard it from a friend on his Facebook page.)

Log in to Reply

Journalists' "likes," "friends," "retweets," etc. on social media do not reflect bias

Comments

3 thoughts on “Journalists’ “likes,” “friends,” “retweets,” etc. on social media do not reflect bias”

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Recent Comments

Posts about

Posts about

Posts about

Posts about

Posts about

Newsletter

Journalists' "likes," "friends," "retweets," etc. on social media do not reflect bias

Comments

3 thoughts on “Journalists’ “likes,” “friends,” “retweets,” etc. on social media do not reflect bias”

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Login

Recent Comments

Posts about

Posts about

Posts about

Posts about

Posts about

Newsletter