They Can’t Kill The “Tea Party” (Even Though They’d Like To)

Our friend Chris Cillizza at the Washington Post with his latest “Worst Week in Washington.”

The Gadsden flag is flying at half-staff this past week.

The tea party – that plucky insurgent movement that, as recently as two years ago, began trying to reshape the Republican Party and politics more generally – finds itself flailing as 2012 draws to a close, buffeted by infighting, defeats and a broad struggle to find a second act…

The movement needs to decide whether it can survive as an outside force or whether it can become more aligned with the GOP without sacrificing the principles on which it was founded.

As evidence of the “Tea Party’s” dilemma, Cillizza cites the resignation of Sen. Jim DeMint to run the Heritage Foundation, the reported decline of FreedomWorks under allegations of mismanagement, and the loss of committee assignments by certain freshmen members of Congress aligned with the movement. The establishment GOP is, fair to say, over them.

But weren’t they always? Top-down declarations of the “Tea Party’s” demise leave out something important–the fact that the “Tea Party” was never a top-down movement.

Now, it’s true that the “Tea Party” shares, in large part, its origin with the very same Republican strategists in Washington who are now declaring them out of style. Organizations like FreedomWorks provided critical back-end support for budding “Tea Party” and so-called “9.12″ groups ahead of their zenith of influence in the 2010 elections. But the fact is, those strategists didn’t create the “Tea Party”–and now that it exists, they can’t kill it, at least not without severely harming their own future prospects. The biggest reason for this is that the “Tea Party” is the Republican base, but with a new self-identification that is not under control of the Party.

Because they have no central structure, you can’t say in a blanket way that “The Tea Party” has problems. You might be able to say that grassroots conservatism has problems, but that’s not the same thing–and the reality of that is far more threatening to the Republican Party as a viable political entity. It was necessary to create the “Tea Party” to provide a home for right-wing base voters who railed against perceived failings in both parties, but would surely vote Republican.

Today, the tail may no longer wag the dog, but the GOP establishment still needs their base.

So no, we can’t really agree that the “Tea Party” had the worst week. It may turn out to be the politicians who thought they could ever “control” an irrational and headless movement.

12 Community Comments, Facebook Comments

  1. JeffcoBlueJeffcoBlue says:

    And now it is preparing to eat them.

  2. ajb says:

    If their billionaire benefactors pull the plug, they’ll dry up and blow away in one election cycle.  

  3. Pam Bennett says:

    The Bircher/KKK division of the Republican Party will be around until the Kock brothers find another group to work in the party.  The Demint resignation from the Senate is very interesting.  The Kock bros are feeling pretty confident that two things can come from the move. First is they get their choice of replacement.  Second is they expect the heritage bircher/kkk operation, will exert national pressure on local elections.  Although there were several far right types winning elections the last four years, none of the local and state elections have been like what will happen in the future.  Think of Buck, but farther right.

  4. GalapagoLarryGalapagoLarry says:

    If the nominal Republican Party survives it will survive as the tea party party. If the old guard corporatist “Republican Party” survives it will exist as an outside movement without the name–some day, perhaps to form a new, differently named party. With DeMint’s takeover of the Heritage Foundation (with its purposeful blessing, of course) the tea party movement will soon win the internecine war.

    The tea party movement has not been friendly toward corporate welfare. That is the old guard’s religion. Remember? They, at first, were unaligned; they merely hated the bank bailout and government. When they were gobbled up by the big money boys they became convinced it was Obama’s bailout. So they hate Obama. But the smart ones have been fighting the old party loyalists as fiercely as they’ve fought Obama.

    Now the Republican Party, by consuming the tea party movement, is rapidly becoming the tea party. It’s the old corporatist conservatives who will be looking for a new home. The tea party is settling in–as the Republican Party.

  5. Barron X says:

    one stands for American values; one stands for hate and selfishness and power for the sake of power.  Kinda like it’s Democratic Party identical twin.  

  6. DavidThi808DavidThi808 says:

    They could just turn it off. The problem is the encouraged the growth of the tea party and now find they can’t control the beast. And with a substantial chunk of the base believing in the tea party and a significant number of true believers in Congress, they may have lost control of the party.

  7. Sure it was astro-turf. But for astro-turf it had some pretty deep roots. Like the Christian Coalition, once set up the people it sparked into action continued the movement completely out of control of the people who paid to have it put in place.

    There are enough Tea Party caucus members in Congress even after the election to make things very difficult for the establishment. And FOX, at least, still seems intent on kicking out the establishment and letting in the looney bin.

    And let’s face it, the really really rich guys still have their best opportunity at paying no taxes and having no regulations if the Tea Party remains strong.

  8. Duke Coxdukeco1 says:

    it is actually spelled “Koch”, Pam.

    Unless we are witnessing an editorial statement in there somewhere.

  9. VoyageurVoyageur says:

    as long as so many Tea Parties are:

    1 Birthers

    2.Climate Change deniers

    3. Zealots who believe in a six-thousand year old earth where Eve played with Dinosaurs in the Garden of Eden

      then it is simply wrong to claim the Tea Party stands for American values.  And yet I think a majority of Tea Parties would endorse all three of these whack job notions.

       

  10. GalapagoLarryGalapagoLarry says:

    that the tea partyers will ever start thinking and acting like real Americans and living by true American values.

Leave a Reply

Comment from your Facebook account


You may comment with your Colorado Pols account above (click here to register), or via Facebook below.