Please Don’t Threaten The “Honey Badger”

We’re obliged to note Westword’s report out yesterday:

Secretary of State Scott Gessler has faced a lot of pushback for his efforts to identify immigrants who are illegally on Colorado’s voter rolls. But over the summer, those criticisms escalated to a new level when he received multiple violent threats, some targeting his family. Through an Open Records request, we now have new details on one disturbing phone call and the subsequent investigation — and more information is expected this week.

While the threats took place over the summer — and death threats toward politicians are not all that uncommon — these cases have a lot of significance now and will continue to be important in the coming months.

Why?

Because Gessler, a Republican and the state’s chief election officer, is currently the focus of criminal and ethics investigations, both the result of complaints from Colorado Ethics Watch, a watchdog group that has closely scrutinized Gessler on a number of issues. Based on open records requests it filed with the Secretary of State’s office, in October Ethics Watch alleged that Gessler had misused state funds for travels outside the scope of his office.

As Westword’s Sam Levin reports, a call placed to the state’s election information line last August turned into a long rant about the letters Gessler sent over the summer to registered voters he dubiously “suspected” may not be citizens. The caller said Republicans “should be shot in the head,” and indicated that “many people” know where Gessler’s family lives.

The call was investigated by the CBI, but Denver DA Mitch Morrissey declined to press charges. Investigation reportedly reveals this person made a similar threat toward Rep. Doug Lamborn last year, and Levin’s retelling of the CBI report paints a picture of a harmless, albeit very stupid, crackpot. That said, we don’t think anyone will dispute the necessity of taking any such threats made against the Secretary of State or his family seriously.

In terms of the investigation(s) underway regarding Gessler’s alleged misuse of discretionary funds, however, Westword’s Open Records Act request explains only one detail among numerous questionable incidents–from using these funds to attend partisan events at all, to “sweeping” the account empty at fiscal year’s end in a check to himself. Sympathy for Gessler over threats made against him or his family, which we’ll say again are totally unacceptable, doesn’t extend to excusing unethical or illegal behavior on his part.

But if any of you happen to recognize this crackpot, please let him know he’s not helping.

14 Community Comments, Facebook Comments

  1. Diogenesdemar says:

    I would hope to see a mechanism whereby he or she could not own or purchase guns, ammunition, body armor, steak knifes . . . or pretty much anything more deadly than a flyswatter.

    Once is intolerable, but twice . . . that we know of?

    I know this is not the intended conversation for this diary, but given the events of this past year, it damn well ought to be.  There’s a world of difference between heated, free speech and no-longer-tolerable threats — we need to begin to recognize and appreciate the distinction.  

  2. Libertad says:

    Is this a cover diary to explain away the failure of Morrissey to indict in this case?

  3. DavidThi808DavidThi808 says:

    There should be zero tolerance for physical threats against politicians because it can’t help but impact them to some degree.

  4. Jones Smith says:

    Doesn’t it seem weird that Gessler has shamelessly used a threat to his family as a distraction from unethical spending that had nothing to do with his family? From the beginning, he and his staff have tried to focus on one plane ticket as a misdirection from an entire pattern of spending.

    It seems like the press keeps falling for it – the whole purpose is to create confusion with the public about what Gessler was actually spending money on and when. Being complicit in of a pols’ deliberate strategy of creating confusion is not the mark of good journalism.  

  5. GalapagoLarryGalapagoLarry says:

    Well, that let’s all of us off the hook.

  6. BlueCat says:

    It’s been a while.

  7. Imagine if every threat against the President was prosecuted – the non-felon birther population would drop to near-nothing.

    The guy apparently is an idiot, but apparently after review not an actual threat. I’m not going to second-guess that any more than I second-guess the DAs and Secret Service for not prosecuting any of a number of people who have threatened the President.

  8. allyncooper says:

    I had two people show up on my doorstep on a Sunday afternoon and physically threaten me, a couple “business people” running a scam and I was warning people about it.

    Contacted the Lakewood police and they did nothing.  

  9. ProgressiveCowgirlProgressiveCowgirl says:

    And has believed it from day one, when he got pushback on moonlighting at his old job.

  10. Diogenesdemar says:

    at the least, he wants everyone else to believe that.  

  11. RedGreenRedGreen says:

    should always merit some sort of prosecution, too.  

  12. parsingreality says:

    Or was it the 5th?

Leave a Reply

Comment from your Facebook account


You may comment with your Colorado Pols account above (click here to register), or via Facebook below.