FOX 31's Eli Stokols:
On Monday morning, the Colorado House of Representatives did something it has never done before, debating the civil unions bill that’s been introduced for three straight years.
The debate could have happened at the end of last year’s session, after civil unions survived three successive hearings before GOP-controlled committees, but then Speaker Frank McNulty shut down the House floor on the session’s penultimate day, effectively running out the clock on the bill and 30 others.
“This marks the first day in my time here that the full House will debate civil unions,” said the sponsor, Rep. Mark Ferrandino, D-Denver, who became the current House Speaker after Democrats swept competitive statehouse races last fall just months after the legislative meltdown over civil unions.
“This bill is about love, family and equality under the law.”
Final passage in the state House of Representatives of the Colorado Civil Union Act today marks the completion of a legislative campaign to enact basic rights for the state's gay and lesbian couples that began in 2006, when the Democratic-controlled legislature sent Referendum I to the ballot bypassing GOP Gov. Bill Owens. That referendum narrowly failed, and a constitutional gay marriage ban, Amendment 43, passed that year: even as Democrats celebrated the second in what would become an unparalleled string of electoral victories in 2006, this election was a also a nadir for LGBT equality advocates in Colorado.
Since then, there have been many changes.
Public attitudes on equality for gays and lesbians are undergoing a rapid generational shift as older conservative voters leave the electorate and are replaced by, on both sides of the aisle, younger, more tolerant voters and officeholders. The civil unions/"domestic partnerships" narrowly rejected by voters in 2006 now enjoy wide support according to poll after poll. Beyond that, public opinion has overall moderated on the issue as more and more pop culture figures, sports celebrities, and others have "come out" for a more tolerant society. Between 2006 and the re-introduction of civil unions legislation three years ago, other limited steps like the 2009 designated beneficiaries law were taken and were well-received by the public.
Despite all of these shifts, it proved impossible to bring Republicans with any kind of legislative power to the table. In 2010, the GOP eked out a one-seat majority in the House at the crest of the "GOP wave." That GOP majority proceeded to kill the civil unions bill both years they controlled the chamber, the second time in a highly controversial use of legislative procedure to shut down debate on the bill before it could pass–which it would have, with a few moderate Republicans voting for it.
The 2012 civil unions debacle was a significant factor in the sweeping loss of the Colorado House to Democrats that fall. In addition to being widely publicized and used against key swing-seat legislators, the incident galvanized wealthy LGBT donors in support of retaking the Colorado House, in a way they almost certainly would not have had the bill been allowed to pass in a GOP-held chamber. This is an important point, and conservative pro-equality groups like Coloradans for Freedom understand it: if the debate can move past basic issues of equality and discrimination, there is much more political diversity within the LGBT community than one might think.
But for now, as the Grand Junction Sentinel's Charles Ashby reports, they have missed their chance.
“What this bill is about, really, is the Bible. Is it right or wrong?” said Rep. Lori Saine, R-Dacono…
Rep. Amy Stephens, R-Colorado Springs, tried to amend the bill to send the measure to the 2015 ballot, saying voters in 2006 rejected a similar idea. That year, voters narrowly defeated Referendum I, which would have created domestic partnerships for same-sex couples.
That made Ferrandino mad.
“I’m just astounded by this,” Ferrandino shouted. “I don’t ask to put your relationships up for a vote of the people. Times have changed, but what hasn’t changed is the fact that fundamental civil rights should not be a vote of the people. It’s what we get elected to do, to make sure that we have equality under the law.”
There are, as in prior years, some Republicans who are voting yes on the Civil Union Act. But due to term limits and the loss of a key pro-civil unions GOP Senator in a nasty Republican primary–partly fought over the issue–there are actually fewer Republicans in support of the bill now then before. The argument that a 2006 election result is still binding is rendered hypocritical by the defeat of a GOP-supported anti-"Obamacare" ballot measure in 2010. You may have noticed that Republicans would still like to get rid of "Obamacare" despite this election result.
Both sides are fond of saying "elections matter." The story of civil unions in Colorado proves that better than most.
Full story: Civil Unions: A Long Legislative Journey That Ends Today
Ferrandino is awesome. The snivelly little bigots are just as small as he made them appear.
Anyway, that observation aside, today will be a good day for Colorado. Not a great day, unfortunately, since a) it's not full marriage, but the separate-but-equal equivalent, and b) we are behind the times a bit, since other states have had full marriage equality for years. Still, a victory is a victory and it will be cause to celebrate.
Colorado has a proud tradition of strong Christian faith. I've heard concerns about Gay Marriage trampling on the first amendment rights of florists and bakers who want to run Christ-centered businesses. I don't know all the details on this, could someone bring me up to speed?
Idiot,
Here is a link to a story from the summer. The person in the link may have liability under C.R.S. 24-34-601. This is NOT legal advice.
Hope this helps you out in getting up to speed.
Which Bible is she referring to?
The one I know about recoognized several forms of marriage I would be surprised to find Re Saine supports:
- A man, his wife and her slaves
- A man, his wives
- A man, his wife and his concubines
- A male rapist and his victim
I'm not even going to get into the wife as chattel or reuirements for the wife's virginity and punishment for lack thereof.
It's so …ridiculous.
(BTW- as to "the voters have spoken" – yeah- TABOR was 0-8 before it passed. The voters are never exactly the same and while, of course, elections have consequences, the voters of the last election are always soon to be irrelevant. Not just less relevant- immaterial. Because we get to vote again next time.)
And, of course you haven't mentioned what is true if you take all of the Bible literally. That is that Adam and Eve's children had to commit incest for there to be any of us because they were the only humans and how did their children propogate the race without sleeping with themselves or their parents.
It's important that laws be written concordant with scripture.
Hey, Deano – if you're going to be straight man, you gotts to give the line once in awhile. There is no way to hit this.
Yeah,
Death to gays. That's what the Bible literally says. It also says in Genesis 2:7
7 And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
Since man became a "living soul" only after God breathed into his nostrils the breath of live" which we must take literally, then abortion is OK since a pre-breathing person has no soul. Of course, there is Exodous too which treats the unborn like chattle, requiring men who intentionally kill an unborn child against the will of the woman to merely pay a fine. And what about the dry bones.
Please don't feed this tripe to me. I too am a Christian, as are a number of the people voting for the Civil Unions bill. You really are too stupid to argue this stuff with me.
I'm stupid enough to argue this stuff with anyone. I have the degrees to prove it.
I don't believe degrees make anyone stupid or smart. Your degrees don't matter to me and mine shouldn't matter to you.
Whose scripture? On what basis do you so conclude?
Stop!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What? You need a gun , maybe….?
Hey Duke!
Welcome home, glad you're safe.
Missed you this AM, great to hear from you.
Stay safe!
I've always wondered what scripture says about, for instance, gun registration or the telecommunications industry. Can someone bring me up to speed?
Passed 39-26!
Final vote 39-26, with Gerou and Murray (Rs) voting in favor.
It's a good day!
Might be kind of neat, certainly ironic, if one of the first couples to engage in a "civil union" is straight
Does the bill exclude those already married?
I could get extra secular civil united on top of my (not the least bit religious) marriage.
YOU could also be Citizens United
I am the man from Nantucket.
wow, you are really old and you've done a lot of stuff.
Fuck it
Wow!
Think back to January 9th.
Every bit of this was just a piece of legislation that might pass, but everybody has to admit that we wondered if the Legislature would keep its' collective nerve. Would they choose going to the Capitol to make a difference, or for a paycheck and bennies?
Passed legislation is the greatest proof.
And gun legislation as well. These are some very good people we have up on that hill.
Thanks to all that did this. Thank you very much.