CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
May 10, 2013 08:33 AM UTC

Heritage Foundation: A BSing Too Far?

  • 2 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

Politico:

The Heritage Foundation has gone into damage-control mode in the last few days, after coming under fire from Republicans and conservative outside groups over a report it published that puts the price tag of immigration reform at $6.3 trillion.

The conservative think tank is considering hiring a high-profile public relations firm to help deal with the fallout of the report that was supposed to be their big play in the immigration debate, according to two sources familiar with Heritage.

The group has also come under scrutiny after it was reported that one of the authors of the report asserted previously that white Americans have higher IQs than immigrants…

Adds the Washington Post:

The Post’s Wonkblog pointed out that the study’s co-author has argued that there are deep-set, likely genetic IQ differences between races and that low-IQ immigrants should be kept out of the country. Heritage distanced itself from that argument, saying “its findings in no way reflect the positions of The Heritage Foundation.” The American Prospect highlighted the fact that the anti-”amnesty” study is featured far less prominently on Heritage’s Spanish-language site…

That’s not to say the opposition to immigration reform is dead or that Heritage’s numbers won’t again be used in the argument against it. But thanks to a divided right and a more nimble left, supporters are no longer easy to catch by surprise.

For decades, the Heritage Foundation has been the conservative "gold standard" for research and talking points. In this way, Heritage serves the same role nationally that the Independence Institute does in Colorado, with numerous working groups churning out ideological backup on the broadest possible range of issues.

Well folks, it seems somebody has taken a look at the changing demographics in this country, and realized that Heritage's ideological hard line against immigration reform is now a liability. And suddenly the same methodological problems Heritage has always had, even relied upon to fill gaping holes in their logic, are a huge problem that Republicans must pre-emptively smack down in the name of factuality! Good on them regardless, we guess.

Maybe they'll step up next time Jon Caldara says "guns in Colorado will never be able to get a magazine again."

Comments

2 thoughts on “Heritage Foundation: A BSing Too Far?

  1. BS is putting it politely. The guy responsible for the bogus numbers and theories in this report is a notorious racist with close ties to the white supremacist blogosphere. Here's a little more:

    Richwine is a senior policy analyst at The Heritage Foundation, a Washington-based conservative think tank, which he joined in 2010 after earning a doctorat in public policy from Harvard in 2009. His doctoral dissertation, titled “IQ and Immigration Policy,” was recently unearthed by The Washington Post's Dylan Matthews, who reports that Richwine believes "there are deep-set differentials in intelligence between races."

    But

    On Wednesday, The Heritage Foundation released statements distancing itself from Richwine's dissertation.

    "This is not a work product of The Heritage Foundation. Its findings in no way reflect the positions of The Heritage Foundation," Heritage VP of Communications Mike Gonzalez told BuzzFeed. "Nor do the findings affect the conclusions of our study on the cost of amnesty to the U.S. taxpayer."

    Seriously? He's a senior policy analyst for Heritage and he provided and crunched the numbers in the report but the fact that his belief in the racial inferiority of Latino immigrants from south of the border gives him every incentive to produce negative findings doesn't affect the study's conclusions?  That and the fact that he included only hypothetical costs and not one penny of potential economic contribution to massage his numbers? We're supposed to buy  this crap?

    We always knew that Heritage was conservative biased and that's fine.  We have  progressive biased think tanks too. But with this report they have lost any semblance of credibility or even claim to basic decency.  Why do they have this guy working for them in the first place? Is it usual for non-racist organizations to  hire and promote known racists? To let them work up the numbers for their reports?

    Any use by the GOP of anything in this BS racist report must be seen as a total abandonment of any attempt to improve their percentage of the Latino vote. Please feel welcome in our big tent even though we stand by the work of analysts who believe that you're gentically inferior?  Really?  In the absence of ethnic cleansing, using this report for political purposes pretty much means game over for today's version of the GOP in terms of surviving into the future. And good riddance.

     

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/08/jason-richwine-heritage-foundation-iq-immigrants_n_3240596.html

     

  2.  

     Why do they have this guy working for them in the first place?

    If he ever loses his job, I'm sure the Mesa County Republicans can find him a position in Grand Junction.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

209 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!