CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
May 28, 2013 09:27 AM UTC

Gardner replaces his post-election-immigration-happy-face with the frowny face we're used to

  • 22 Comments
  • by: Jason Salzman

Cory Gardner (not smiling).
Cory Gardner (not smiling).
(Promoted by Colorado Pols)

Rep. Cory Gardner said on the radio Thursday that he and other House Republicans will act like a giant fence and stop the Senate's bipartisan immigration bill from becoming law, unless it's changed from its current form.

Any journalists who caught the interview would have to agree that Gardner's tough-guy tone isn't what you'd expect to hear from a guy who told a reporter the day after the last election that it was "absolutely critical" to bring Latinos into the GOP tent. You'd expect Gardner to be sounding more like Republican Sen. Marco Rubio, but he's not.

"[A]s the Senate bill is written, there are not the votes for that bill to move in the House of Representatives." Gardner announced on KFKA radio's AM Colorado, aligning himself with Republican House Speaker John Boehner.

As for his own problems with the bill, Gardner wants more border security, saying immigration reform "has to start with border security and some kind of a proof or trigger on border security so that it doesn’t happen unless you can actually prove that we have done the – taken the steps and components necessary to implement meaningful security measures."

Specifically, Gardner cited the need for "additional personnel on the border," an "e-verify system," and "additional security, a fence, you name it, on the border."

"The Senate version has a trigger," said Gardner, "but it’s like five years into the program [and] then it doesn’t stop anything. It just says, “Okay, study it in a committee and work harder on it. No. We’ve got to prove to American people that, thirty years from now, this system still works."

The Senate bill allocates billions to border security and sets milestones for enforcement.

Asked by host Devon Lentz what happens if the Senate won't accept Gardner's ideas to change the immigration bill, which passed the Senate Judiciary Committee on a 13-5 vote last week, Gardner said he doesn't think there has to be an impasse but:

"I think we have to convince the Senate that if they are truly interested in immigration reform, this is the way it needs to be done."

So it's Gardner's way or the highway back to Mexico?

Reporters should call Gardner out for replacing his post-election happy face with the frowny face we've seen from Gardner in the past on immigration.

Comments

22 thoughts on “Gardner replaces his post-election-immigration-happy-face with the frowny face we’re used to

  1. How many people does he want as border guards?  Does he want them unionized?  With full pensions?

    The "secure the border" line is almost invariably used as a cliche to avoid thinking critically about the immigration issue.

  2. Having been down near the border a few times since our obsession with border security began, I'd love to ask Rep Gardner what exactly it is that he believes is sufficient personnel.

    I was stopped some 75 miles from the border in New Mexico by a checkpoint reminiscent of an actual border crossing. There were about twenty Border Patrol vehicles available at the checkpoint, "just in case". When I was down in Tucson, I saw what looked to be an entire Air Force base taken over by Border Patrol.

    We have 10 drones patrolling the border, 650+ miles of fencing (out of 1929 total miles of border), more than 18,000 Border Patrol officers along the US-Mexico border. Last year it is reported that net immigration across the Mexican border was ZERO.

    Gardner's about-face is just one of many that voters should consider when answering the question: will the Republican Party change its current stances? Of course they won't – they're too mired in the political extremism they themselves encouraged in order to drum up votes. Discourage that extremist base, and Republicans lose what representative strength they still maintain.

  3. House Republicans are going to screw it up and then blame Democrats.  They so dysfunctional now that they are incapable of doing anything successfully that involves the Obama Administration.  The minority within this minority will prevail and immigration reform will be sacriviced for ideological bigotry.

  4. Americans are tired of empty promises on border security. We need to reform immigration, but let's do it with our eyes open. Seal the border first, then implement the compassionate parts. Nobody wants to see people suffer, but that has to incude American workers.

    1. Seal the border? You realize people even get through the North Korean border, and that has tens of thousands of US troops, South Korean troops, and massive minefields/fortifications defending it?

      "Seal/secure the border" is often just used as a cliche to avoid thinking about the immigration issue.

      1. I respectfully disagree. It may be a big challenge but the 21st century demands new thinking about America's security. We do need to secure the border, and we owe it to legal immigrants who play by the rules to make sure we do that before we even think about amnesty for illegal immigrants.

        My opinion is very mainstream. Cory Gardner knows it, and good for him.

        1. "Nobody wants deaths in the desert?" The current policy of locking down major crossing points was conceived with the full knowledge that it would lead to deaths in the desert. They told themselves it would only be a handful, not hundreds every year, but even so, they knew that people would try to go that way and some wouldn't make it. And you cheered this on, and now want to make it harder.

          It's like this, guppy – economic forces trump all. It's still better in the USA than in Mexico, where our poverty is their lower middle class. People will risk anything because they have nothing to lose. And you want a Great Wall of North America. They'll just fucking sail around it, like the Mongols rode around China's.

          UnChristian, like I said. Also expensive and unrealistic. Meanwhile, bridges around the country are collapsing, soldiers are screwed over when they leave the service, schools are getting more screwed up, and jobs aren't being created because your party would rather destroy this nation than work loyally with Dems.

          And you think you're American? Truly American? Dead Mexicans in Arizona are more American than you.

  5. Now I'm confused. Are there still people flooding accross our southern border? I was reading something online the other day that claimed there was more emigration to Mexico last year than immigation to the U.S., including not a few Americans ex-pats. Thanks to the greed that cause the banking collapse, the tanking of our economy, and the arrrogance of the Guppies who don't see a problem with taking from the poor to give to Wall Street, Mexico looks better to them than the U.S. Older ex-pats can live less expensively in retirement than they can here and even though the Mexican economy still sucks, a lot of their citizens have decided they if they're going to be broke and unemployed they'd rather do that at home.See, the Repubs solved the "immigration crisis" Aren't they clever?

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

108 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!