U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
August 05, 2013 08:01 PM UTC

Chieftain: The Gypsy Votercalypse is Coming!

  • 10 Comments
  • by: kwtree

(Promoted by Colorado Pols)

Just when I thought that the Pueblo Chieftain was trying hard to be more balanced and less sensational, they run a piece like this one.  First line:

There are growing concerns about the potential impact of the state’s new voting law.

So, we have anonymous third party attribution of a quote. "Someone" has growing concerns. Who? You won't know until you read through the paywall, although there is a hint at the bottom. Becky Mizel, Chair of the Pueblo Republican Party. She's very concerned. Jeff Chostner, the Democratic District Attorney, who would have to prosecute any voter fraud found. He's concerned, too, but we won't know that without a subscription.

Then, you have sloppy reporting and sourcing. Which new voting law? This refers to House Bill 1303, passed in the last legislative session. What's got conservative shorts twisted is page 10 of the bill, which changes the requirement to live in Colorado prior to an election from 30 days to 22 days. That makes Gypsies pack their wagons, doncha know. We'll have voter fraud for sure, if we just cut 8 days from the residence requirement.

Then there is an anonymous photo of County Clerk Gilbert Ortiz. Nice photo, no caption. Who is this guy and what does he have to do with voter fraud? Sorry, you have to pay to know that. UPDATE: This is only a problem on the online preview edition. The paper edition, and the paid digital pdf edition, have a caption with a quote attributed to Ortiz: "The fundamental rights of the individual outweigh the possible loopholes to the law. "

Continuing with the portion of the article visible on the online preview edition:

People need only to swear under penalty of perjury that they have lived in Colorado for at least 22 days and reside or plan to reside in the precinct or county they wish to vote. Once they do that, they’re allowed to cast ballots.

See anything missing there? How about the fact that registering to vote in a place one does not live is voter fraud?***  If one reads through the paywall, one finds some  reasonable quotes from Mr. Ortiz  explaining that the "new law" is neither new, nor a big deal, nor likely to result in fraud based on past experience.

But Pueblo County Clerk and Recorder Gilbert “Bo” Ortiz said the ability for people to register late in the election cycle was available before the new law.

The only real change has been the elimination of a 30-day waiting period.**

Ortiz said people were allowed to come in at the last minute and change their address and the process was similar to what it is now.

Over the last 10 years, Ortiz says, out of 433,942 total ballots cast in Pueblo County in Colorado, only two actual voter fraud cases were found. Per District Attorney Chostner, one was an English emigrant who returned home, and the other one registered when she got a driver's license. It was an honest mistake, and her voter registration was canceled.

Then Mr. Chostner relates his concerns with this recall election:

Chostner said there hasn’t been a problem with voter fraud in Pueblo County in the past, but he’s afraid the new law has opened that door.

So, OMG! Everyone panic! The gypsy voters are coming! No one has any real evidence of the coming votercalypse, but what the heck. Feeding paranoia and rumors is good for the paper's circulation. Maybe people will pay to read the actual article.

My real problem with this article is the "teaser" on the front page. The anonymous quotes, the fear-raising headline, the lack of sources for the reader to make up his/her own mind, the only quote on the front page being from someone who really has no evidence that the law will result in voter fraud, but is quoted as a reliable source anyway…And, most of all, NOT including the information that voter fraud is a felony crime. **

The Chieftain is still playing the same old fear-mongering games, playing to emotions rather than reason. Because this recall election needs more emotional intensity, right?

 

When the Gypsy Votercalypse  shambles over the horizon, watch for them to come stumbling by the Chieftain office. There's a drop-off box there. I hear that they're looking for brains.

**The law which allows voters to register in another precinct on election day, rather than waiting 30 days previous to the election, was enacted in 2012. It is 1-2-216(4)(a) . It is still election fraud, and a felony, if false information is given in order to vote in the new precinct.

***UPDATE: Mr. Ortiz was kind enough to send me information about the relevant Colorado statutes covering penalties for election fraud, if a voter knowingly submits false residence information:  (b/c gypsy voters are known for doing that)

1-13-709. Voting in wrong precinct. Any person who, at any election provided by law, knowingly votes or offers to vote in any election precinct in which he or she is not qualified to vote shall be punished by a fine of not more than five thousand dollars or by imprisonment in the county jail for not more than eighteen months, or by both such fine and imprisonment.

1-13-709.5. Residence – false information – penalty. Any person who votes by knowingly giving false information regarding the elector's place of present residence commits a class 6 felony and shall be punished as provided in section 18-1.3-401, C.R.S.

Comments

10 thoughts on “Chieftain: The Gypsy Votercalypse is Coming!

    1. What evidence can you cite to that fraudulent voter registration is occurring in Pueblo County? If, as you say, its a problem then you can surely cite to specific instances where this has happened in Pueblo or El Paso counties.

    2. Moderatus,

      Disagreement with is not the same as being an enemy to, no matter what John Boehner says.

      I feel compassion, if anything, for DA Chostner – he's undoubtedly under pressure from S o S Gessler to ferret out Pueblo's share of those 141 voters whom Gessler says voted illegally. This will mean digging through multiple moves and jobs, possible duplicate or misspelled names, etc. A royal pain, no doubt.

      But I happen to agree with County Clerk Ortiz, who in 10 years has found only 2 fraudulent voters in Pueblo County. So I don't think it will be much of a problem, for Chostner or anyone else, no matter how many scary headlines the Chieftain puts out there.

        1. BS1: No "long blue knives" in evidence here. Dems are putting aside differences and working together.  We know if these recalls succeed, local elections won't matter anymore.

          With enough corporate money, cooperative conservative media, and a "one -issue" base, regular elections can be put aside anywhere in the US.

           

    3. Yes, Cletus Immoderatus, we can disagree with a Democrat if we think he's spouting crap. That's probably an alien concept to you.

      That whole lockstep-Sieg Heil allegiance to one political party is outdated and dangerous, but comforting to small minds.

  1. It is not strange, Modertadus, that you keep failing to substantiate any of the "problems" (rhetorically weak phrasing) "people" (Republican spin-meisters) "find"( make shit up about) with this law.

     

    1. Wow, that is some weapons grade butt-hurt you're sporting, there, PeeBlow.  Maybe if the Chieftain would stop being the Weekly World News of Southern Colorado, the stupid blog would stop reporting on it.  But we both know that's not gonna happen, right?

      Stupid Blog.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

216 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!