DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Jena Griswold
60%↑
40%↑
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%↑
30%
20%↓
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Manny Rutinel
(D) Yadira Caraveo
45%↓
40%↑
30%
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Jena Griswold
60%↑
40%↑
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%↑
30%
20%↓
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Manny Rutinel
(D) Yadira Caraveo
45%↓
40%↑
30%
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
As the Denver Post's Monte Whaley reports:
Colorado's drivers face fewer dangerous bridges after a six-year push to replace old and crumbling crossings statewide.
As of July 31, the state has replaced 53 bridges while another 22 are under construction and 33 are in the design phase, Colorado Department of Transportation officials said Tuesday…
CDOT says the passage of the FASTER — Funding Advancement for Surface Transportation and Economic Recovery — legislation in March 2009, helped speed bridge repair and removal. The legislation created the Colorado Bridge Enterprise, which is a dedicated funding source for replacing poor-rated bridges.
The contentious fight over the FASTER vehicle registration fee increases, both during its passage in the Colorado legislature and afterwards as an electioneering battle cry for "Tea Party" Republicans, has faded from memory in recent months. We haven't seen any response from the Colorado Republican Party, or for that matter anybody on the right, to the Colorado Department of Transportation's press release yesterday. But it's worth remembering the massive fit the GOP pitched over the creation of a dedicated funding stream for bridge repairs, with just about every Republican running for office in 2010, from Scott McInnis to Walker Stapleton citing this "tax increase" as a reason to throw Democrats out. After 2010, some Republicans continued to grouse about FASTER, although the road construction lobby's tight relationship with GOP Speaker Frank McNulty ensured no serious effort to repeal FASTER would materialize in the GOP-controlled Colorado House.
Today, after a few minor hiccups, the estimated $100 million annually the FASTER legislation nets for repairing Colorado's aging bridges is making a real difference. Voters who have read about terrifying bridge collapses in other states deserve to know that in Colorado, we're doing what we can to maintain our infrastructure. Where the right wanted to use FASTER to stoke opposition to Democrats, today FASTER is an opportunity for Democrats to close the "value loop" for voters: to show them tangibly why public investments are worth making.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: harrydoby
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: harrydoby
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: Thorntonite
IN: On, Off. On, Off. Trump Treats Economy Like Pong*
BY: harrydoby
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: unnamed
IN: Boebert Backs Constitution-Busting Assault On Federal Judiciary
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Colorado Gets More Nu-Que-Ler Friendly
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Nobody said consumers do not value safe, effective and affordable roads.
The problem is the courts have tried to play the role of Webster by altering the definition of tax, fee and enterprise.
The problem is nobody trusts the voter yet the voter elects representatives.
The problem is elected representatives who do not have and follow an understandable, enforceable constitution are nothing more than dictators.
The problem is elected officials sit idle while political judges twist reality. The Colorado legislator should refer measures that protect and remind the general populace as to the legitimate definition of fee, tax and enterprise.
The problem is work around, sleight of hand and word twisting is truly perverse.
The problem is we all get dirty in the process.
Really if legislators were doing their job, we would NOT be having this conversation…
This is pretty close. A clean transportation tax hike might get approved by the people. The point is that under TABOR, politicians are not supposed to be able to raise taxes, but the activist Supreme Court decided to salami slice the meaning of "tax."
All TABOR requires is to ask. Why is that such a problem for Demorats?
Sorry, I meant DemoCRATs. I wasn't trying to be uncivil.
Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't FASTER pass at the ballot box? If so, what place do these questions have here? I would expect them to be brought up in a diary where the conditions described by Nock actually applied.
FASTER was legislation passed in '09. It was upheld by the state SC.
Ah. I think I was thinking of FASTRAX or whatever that's called.
Getting old…
No worries, I hate all acronyms.
Pesky facts.
Let's turn that around. (I'm not a Democrat BTW.) Why don't we trust the legislature to handle the complex problems of raising and spending revenue? I trust people whose job is to do this stuff more than a large group of people who overwhelmingly don't understand it.
Spoken like a true paternalistic holier than thou Democrat. This is why we oppose you.
I think the thinking here is pretty easy to understand – and actually, it's conservative-friendly logic.
Taxes affect everyone. Vehicle registration fees affect people who have registered vehicles, i.e., drivers. The thinking behind FASTER was that the state needed funds to ensure that Colorado roads were safe for drivers, so it went and got the money from them. No one is being asked to pay for a service that they won't use. If you don't want the service, you're welcome not to register your vehicle in Colorado – our bike paths are great, too! The beef that conservatives I know have with, say, socialized medicine, is that it's coercive. FASTER was/is the opposite – it's pay-as-you-go government.
From the legislature's perspective, not raising the funds was not an option. This was an issue of public safety – people had been injured or killed in bridge collapses (the I-70/C-470 girder and the ominous warning of the I-35W bridge in Minnesota). Under TABOR, the citizens of Colorado had an opportunity to put a gas tax increase on the ballot and approve it, but that hadn't happened in 20 years. The legislature acted because, empirically, no one else was going to.
I have a great idea. Nocklehead and Immoderatus can go around the state fixing the unsafe bridges on their own dime and all by themselves. Because they DID SO BUILD IT themselves. They don't need no stinkin' gubmint.
Ya know, I'm really grateful to live in Colorado, which is mostly run by people who are largely sane. Imagine living in places run by folks who would agree w/ Nock et al., like (*cough, cough*) Texas or Missouri.
Unfortunately, that's a lot of places. Republicans are really doing everything they can, everywhere they can, to break our country.
Even the little bridges in the Big Thompson Canyon now have cameras after being repaired; wow we are all so much safer. FASTER commute to boot.
God I love illegal spending sprees…