CO-04 (Special Election)
See Full Big Line
(R) Greg Lopez
(R) Trisha Calvarese
90%
10%
President (To Win Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Biden*
(R) Donald Trump
80%
20%↓
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
90%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
90%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(D) Adam Frisch
(R) Jeff Hurd
(R) Ron Hanks
40%
30%
20%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert
(R) Deborah Flora
(R) J. Sonnenberg
50%↑
15%
10%↓
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Dave Williams
(R) Jeff Crank
50%↓
50%↑
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
90%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) Brittany Pettersen
85%↑
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(R) Gabe Evans
(R) Janak Joshi
60%↑
35%↓
30%↑
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
October 25, 2013 06:31 AM UTC
29 Comments
dwyer says:
Fri October 25, 2013 at 6:12 AM MDT
To hear boyles on the computer:
http://www.710knus.com
click on the "hear boyles live" logo
I think Tom Mauser is going to be on early
Reply
Fri October 25, 2013 at 6:34 AM MDT
Tom Mauser is on the air, now. I don't know why Open LIne Friday is up now.
Boyles is giving Tom a rough time.
Contact info, thanks to MJ55
http://peterboyles.podbean.com/2013/10/21/peter-boyles-show-oct-21-2013-hr-1/#respond
and the day after, he doubled down with what he called "An update on the Mrs. Doubtfire Recall" (Senator Hudak = Mrs. Doubtfire, get it? Hyar hyar) in which Boyles called the one lone person standing by the carmdoor a "militia", and said that Mike Rosen would be recruiting volunteers to defend the poor mistreated petition signers.
http://www.710knus.com/peterboyles.aspx
studio line 303-696-1971 (probably screened, but worth a try)
twitter: @knus710#peterboyles
FB page: News/Talk 710KNUS comment under the topic "Orwellian Police State petition"
Station general info:
http://www.710knus.com/contact.aspx
710KNUS@710KNUS.com
Office
303-750-5687(KNUS
– See more at: http://coloradopols.com/diary/50881/recall-leader-calls-hudak-supporters-nazis-and-boyles-responds-with-yeah#comments
Angry confrontation. Boyles was on the attack.
Mauer did not successfully refute the contention that anti-petitioners were keeping people from getting out of their cars to sign the petitions. But, boyles kept saying that he was in favor of background checks and Mauer did not point out that the universal background checks were new laws that Hudak, Giron and Morse had passed and was one of the reasons they were subject to recalls.
Last thing Boyles said was "Come on down to the station and bring Evie Hudak with you." I would hope that that challenge would be taken up…..but, I think that they should be prepared for the boyles' style of attack. They should stick to their points and not let boyles throw them.
When did you stop beating your wife?
Do you try and call in? I said you would have been a strong voice.
Why won't you address the issues of wife-beating? What do you have to hide?
Oh, so you did listen to Boyles. He actually asked Mauser that question.
Links are a wonderful invention – try them.
Fair enough, just provide one for your Saturday morning
softcore pornmusic video and we'll call it even.Deal! Here you go.
Frankly, I'm glad that was posted here.
You can continue posting the videos, as well, as far as I'm concerned.
DP, thanks for the good visual summary of abortion law status these days. I don't know if you're young or not, but have you noticed that young women are more pro-life and anti-abortion than we were? I've found very little research on this.
It's like young people in general are much more accepting of gayness and the whole spectrum of sexuality, but much less accepting of abortion. That's what I'm seeing among my young female students, anyway.
I am concerned about it, because we (my generation of feminists) worked damn hard to get Roe V Wade and reasonable birth control and abortion laws, and it looks as though we could lose all of that ground we gained. What do you think?
When I told my 32 year old daughter, very smart, working on research to publish for a Ph.D, that Bernie Herpin is in favor of a person hood amendment, she replied "well, I won't be voting for him. Sadly we lost that round, but I encourage Bernie to forward on? Please proceed, Mr. Herpin.
I think they take it for granted. But in many ways that's even more powerful because they'll view someone trying to undo it as violating assumed basic rights.
Documentary film Uranium Drive-In showing next month at the Starz Denver Film Festival concerning uranium mining in Naturita, Colorado:
Hey Pols. How about posting a quote from someone who actually has something thoughtful to say. You're as bad as MSNBC always focusing on Republican/conservative absudities. How come you never post any quotes from the president or our Democratic legislators. Who the fuck cares what Rush Limbaugh blathers on about? Take about conservative bias in the media. What a right wing echo chamber you boys have turned out to be.
They've ignored my request to end the quotes from increasingly powerless and irrelevant Rush. When's the last time he was able to get what he wanted/ he didn't want McCain. He didn't want Romney. Sure didn't want Obama or a Dem majority Senate. He was going to move to Costa Rica (oddly since they have great universal healthcare) if ACA passed. He didn't want the GOP to give in on the shutdown showdown. If it wasn't for lefty media showcasing his remarks to make fun of them, few would ever hear them anymore.
They also have ignored my suggestion, in the absence of an end to Friday Rush, to add, say, a Wed. (or some other day) quote from Mike Littwin along with a link to his column at the Colorado Independent. Two things would be accomplished: Having something intelligent to respond to and increasing traffic at a worthy site.
Anybody else think a regular Littwin quote and link is a good idea? At least as good an idea as more Rush blather?
Agree completely. In fact, Littwin's column today is a great discussion about Amendment 66:
http://www.coloradoindependent.com/144606/littwin-teaching-kids-in-tabor-land
Thanks and thanks for the link. Anyone else?
Sure. "Apocalypse Now, Armaggedon next year."
Good piece but I'd rather see posters steering people to the new stuff at the Colorado Independent.
"You can be a king or a street sweeper, but everyone dances with the grim reaper"
– Robert Alton Harris, or, Bill & Ted's Bogus Journey, circa 1991
There
And most of Rush's listeners are going to be dancing with him sooner than the average bear. What's his average listener age now? A zillion?
How about a quote from the occasional lucid and intelligent Republican?
Abraham Lincoln regarding the effort to put capital on equal footing with labor or above it:
"Now there is no such relation between capital and labor as assumed,…..
Labor is prior to and independent of capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration."
Read more: State of the Union Address: Abraham Lincoln (December 3, 1861) | Infoplease.com http://www.infoplease.com/t/hist/state-of-the-union/73.html#ixzz2imHBZ0ZC
Did anybody notice the article that the Arctic is warmer than it has been in at least 44k years?
http://www.colorado.edu/news/releases/2013/10/23/cu-boulder-led-study-shows-unprecedented-warmth-arctic
Basically, they sample moss that re-emerged after glaciers retreated on Baffin Island. They analyzed the moss for carbon-14 (to carbon date it) and found essentially none. That's where the 44k number comes from – the limit for reliable carbon dates. The actual age of the moss must be greater than 44k. When they look at the ice core record from Greenland, the last interglacial period (no glaciers) was about 120k years ago. At that time, the northern hemisphere received about 9% more solar radiation than it does today (due to orbital parameters, like tilt of the Earth's axis).
Thus, the last time we saw an Arctic this warm, it was due to long-term solar forcing. This time it's not. There's really only one explanation: Human CO2 emmisions.
Yes, I saw that. Most of the Alaskan ecology is changing. I have a brother in law who lives up there – he says that trees that have grown tall rooted in the permafrost are just falling over because the permafrost has thawed.
. . . that winter of 98,017 (BC) was a mother fucker !!!
Yeah well that just proves it's been this warm before so… no problem. Should I do that heavy sarcasm thing now?