(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Mark Baisley
90%↑
10%
(D) Jena Griswold
(R) Michael Allen
70%
30%
(D) Jeff Bridges
(R) Kevin Grantham
80%↑
20%↓
(D) Melat Kiros
(R) Christy Peterson
95%
2%
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) K. Dennison
90%
2%
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Dwayne Romero60%↓
40%↑
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) E. Laubacher
80%
20%
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Jessica Killin
53%↓
48%↑
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Jason Clark
90%
2%
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) A. Capobianco
90%
2%
(D) Manny Rutinel
(R) Gabe Evans*
55%↑
45%↓
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
Here's a fascinating little window into Rep. Mike Coffman's awkward dance around the issue of immigration. On Rep. Coffman's official congressional website, here's the summary text of Coffman's position on immigration reform as it exists today:
But if you check this page against the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine, you'll notice that Coffman's immigration issue page had slightly different language as recently as April 11th of this year:
As you can see, the word "comprehensive" has been edited out of Coffman's prescription for immigration reform. Of course, this wasn't the meaning of "comprehensive" in regards to immigration reform that most people think of, in fact it's kind of a cynical misuse of the term. After all, even Coffman says now that immigration reform should be about more than "comprehensive enforcement." And in all fairness, Coffman did add a line about "keeping families together"–though for all we know, that could mean keeping them together in deportation.
Either way you look at this, as ditching "comprehensive" immigration reform, or simply un-bastardizing the word "comprehensive," you can see Coffman struggling to get his message together.
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Comments