U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) George Stern
(D) A. Gonzalez
(R) Sheri Davis
40%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
July 21, 2014 06:58 AM UTC
27 Comments
Trollboy knows Republicans can't win on the issues, so he wants the Dems to run with no money. His party gave us Citizen's United, now he can't live with the result.
weird how when the right had all the money things were ok. Now that the left has proven it can raise big money too – people like AC whine and complain. I would prefer no outside money in politics at all. But you play with the rules you have until the rules can be changed.
What's really got AC and the GOTPer's wetting their diapers is that not only are Dems outraising Repugs, but they are doing it through thousands of individuals donating their hard-earned money.
I even gave to 3 federal campaigns over the weekend, so disgusted with the toxic waste dump the Republican Party has become.
Idiot. See the link for what Reagan did after the Korean Air disaster in 1983.
Reagan KoreanAir
How do you suppose the right wing noise machine would react if US armed forces on Obama's watch shot down a civilian aircraft with 290 souls on board?
Obama Derangement Syndrome will no doubt render our resident trolls mute on this topic
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tag/obama-derangement-syndrome/
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/07/the-trouble-with-jared-109107.html
Why Colorado’s bow tie-wearing, tech-millionaire lawmaker is making his fellow Democrats nervous.
Not surprising. Personally I was never a huge Polis fan. Has his upside and his downside for sure. If I lived in his district I wouldn't have a problem voting for him, though. His stands have always struck me as all over the place depending mainly on self interest but with a whole lot more overlap with my own self interest than would be the case with any R.
Nice new ad over at UdallLied.com. Here is a link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7OZKNC5lQI&feature=youtu.be
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/07/21/1315508/-GOP-Senate-candidate-Cory-Gardner-has-multiple-personhood-position-disorder I like this ad much better.
Chickenshit troll can't even embed a video. Too bad it's not as easy as posting a toon, eh?
Aw come on be nice – he is desperate. Supporting con man cory is tough to do. He flip flops so much from day to day. I guess it just depends which way the wind is blowing in Yuma.
I taught him how to put in graphics. I wish I hadn't.
No more AK-47s from Russia. I know some of you will be sad about that.
RMGO will go off the rails over this. I;m sure that in their eyes, the passengers on that Malaysia Airlines jet gave their lives for the Second Amendment. I can hear Sarah Palin now, "Obama is politicizing another tragedy to take away our freedoms."
New York Times has Udall losing.
http://www.nytimes.com/newsgraphics/2014/senate-model/history.html
If he's losing, why does the paper have the race listed as a tossup? They don't have him losing; their most recent tracking has him behind unlike the rest of the tracking which had him ahead. Please lie better.
He lies about as well as anyone I ever met. Hard to improve on that!
Rolling the Dice
With these state-by-state probabilities in hand, our machine randomly simulates all 36 Senate elections. Give it a try below. The spinners are calibrated to the current probabilities we’ve calculated for each state. We let the states move together to some extent, but you’ll no doubt occasionally see some surprising results — over 20 percent of the time, at least one of the races we call “likely” will be won by the opposite party. This is their method of predicting the senate races. What could possibly go wrong with this?
PCat,
Acceptance is difficult.
Colorado: 53% Republican
Louisiana 53% Republican
Iowa and Alaska are even.
Toss up was defined as one party having less than a 65% chance of winning.
The poll has a total of 6 toss ups as so defined.
correction, both parties having less than 65% chance of winning.
BTW, AC, since you've brought up RCP, they're poll averaging still has Udall at +1. Anything within a couple of points either way is toss up, not losing. We'll see who moves where in the coming months but it's really hard to win a statewide election while losing with women by very large margins. You know, the women who overwhelmingly vote against personhood every chance they get?
It's not about acceptance. I care about data. The data show him currently polling below Gardner. The paper also put his race in the tossup category, I'd expect because Gardner's current polling is newly higher and close to the margin and Udall has polled better in the past.
If polls consistently show Udall losing by enough to be outside the margin of error, I'll happily concede that he appears to be losing. What I can't accept is the bullshit spin you're applying to the numbers.
Take away Troll Droppings' bullshit spin, and he has nothing to offer — ever.
There's a new poll out last week that has Udall up by 6, outside of the MOE. It's a Marist poll, and I trust it more than RCP or Q.
ummm… puppy, RCP isn't a poll. It's a site that, among other things, gives results of various polls, including the Marist, the Q, the Gallup, the PPP, Razz, various network polls, etc. and offers an average result as well. I can't figure out whether you and Modster are the same person, a paired program or twins separated at birth.