CO-04 (Special Election)
See Full Big Line
(R) Greg Lopez
(R) Trisha Calvarese
90%
10%
President (To Win Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Biden*
(R) Donald Trump
80%
20%↓
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
90%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
90%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(D) Adam Frisch
(R) Jeff Hurd
(R) Ron Hanks
40%
30%
20%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert
(R) Deborah Flora
(R) J. Sonnenberg
30%↑
15%↑
10%↓
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Dave Williams
(R) Jeff Crank
50%↓
50%↑
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
90%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) Brittany Pettersen
85%↑
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(R) Gabe Evans
(R) Janak Joshi
60%↑
35%↓
30%↑
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
August 15, 2014 08:15 AM UTC
21 Comments
Sure, receive an endorsement like this and then try to persuade Colorado's sane non-right wing extremist voters that you really actually, kind of support a womans right to choose. No, really !
Good luck trying to sell that steaming pile of man loaf, asshole !
Lame, no substance so talk about silliness. Cory has no control over their ads.
. . . or his [evolving] stances, either, apparently?!?
Apparently Cory has no control over what he believes in either.
Cory just pawn in game of life.
Hahaha +10 for Blazing Saddles reference.
Mr. Gardner's Credibility Problem Continues to Expand
Everyone knows that these groups, like National Right to Life, only endorse candidates they believe are absolutely pro-life. They don't endorse candidates who are only half-way committed to the pro-life position, especially their position that life begins at conception. That group's endorsement raises some logical questions Mr. Gardner should answer:
1. In this U.S. Senate race has he responded to their questionaire? If so, please make a copy of your answers public.
2. With National Right to Life's endorsement, which you've received in the past does that mean you support their idea that life beghins at conception? (NRTL only endorses candidates who support that position.)
3. If you do, then do you believe, as you have stated in the past, that all abortions should be made illegal under state and/or federal law?
4. If you still believe that, and there is nothing on the record this year to the contrary, then you agree, you will sponsor and/or vote for laws as a U.S. Senator to eliminate a woman's right to choose?
5. Your campaign responded to this endorsement by trying to deflect the questions above. You said that you don't control who endorses you but that isn't the point. Do you spport the positions of the NRLF that's the real issue?
These questions are appropriate because you have stated you no longer support the state Personhood amendment but you remain a cosponsor of the federal Personhood amendment. Either one eliminates the right to choose.
Mr. Gardner, its time to own up to your true position. You can't have it both ways.
Here's the National Right to Life questionnaire from 2012:
It does have seven questions on it, which one would assume have not changed from 2012 to 2014. In order to get NRTL's 100% endorsement, Gardner would not only have needed to vote the way NRTL wanted, but to answer "Yes" to the following:
As I note below, Colorado Right to Life was skeptical about Con Man Cory's commitment to being "pro-life", and denied him the coveted CRTL boldface type endorsement.
Lame, silly, without substance?
Yep, that describes precisely the amoral clusterf–k of a "party" for which you troll.
Interesting take by "Respect the law Republicans" on Udall's simply supporting the law of the land:
Just goes to show — the GOTP doesn't respect the truth — in fact it's an obstacle to achieving their goals, so it must be suppressed or ignored at all costs.
We really want to entrust Gardner and his ilk with power, right? (NOT)
Ironically, Con Man Cory would be a much better fit for the anti-choice, anti-environment, O&G-owned, no ObamaCare Teabag Heaven of Wyoming. Yee-haw!!!
I wish we could pull Yellowstone and Teton (all of NW Wyo, actually) out of there and safely down to Colorado, and be done with it.
Here's what Colorado Right to Life had to say about Mr. Gardner, after he answered their questionnaire:
Notice how neither of the Senate candidates are in boldface? That's because CRTL only designates 100% pro-life candidates with bold type.
So, National Right to Life disregarded Colorado Right to Life's conclusion that Cory Gardner was not pro-life. Nice.
Or more likely, Cory's getting protective cover ("marched left" wink, wink) from CRTL to support his "moderate" makeover for public consumption. He'll swing back hard a starboard if he should somehow win the Senate race.
Wink wink indeed. They're certainly not going to vote for Udall. They still much prefer Gardner over Udall so why not say Gardner has marched left to attract moderates who would consider a little left of where Gardner used to be a good thing?
I don't think any effort to convince anyone that Gardner is "moderate" enough for Colorado statewide and conservative enough for the base, all at the same time, is going to succeed. Especially in any debates. As Modster would say, he'll be falling all over himself.
Then I guess I should give Modster credit for his prescience regarding Coffman's stumblebum performance in yesterday's debate 🙂
Trying to siphon votes from the "mushy middle" has Conman Cory so far out on a limb you can hear the wood a-crackin'. Somebody better put a net under him for when that limb gives way.
" . . , so far out on a limb you can hear the wood a-crackin, . . . "
Poetic brilliance, Cook!
Not original to me, Dio. Credit goes to Rita Mae Brown. But isn't a vivid picture?
Moran?
It's a play on the misspelling in the GOTP idiot's sign, and the use of Mt. Moran.
You don't actually read through the diaries, do you?
You Moran.
I think that in your case, it would be "MoranIam"