CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
December 01, 2014 09:49 AM UTC

Clock Still Ticking on the Greater Sage-Grouse

  • 5 Comments
  • by: PiceanceDog

(Promoted by Colorado Pols)

Among the news-you-didn’t-hear leading into the holiday weekend, which got buried by other things—some worthy of attention and reflection, others the typical media noise—was a recent poll on the Greater Sage-Grouse.  It shows sportsmen in Colorado (and across the other 10 western state where the bird occurs) favor protecting its habitat. 

This is noteworthy as the federal government just announced it is listing the bird’s smaller relative the Gunnison Sage-Grouse as “Threatened” under the Endangered Species Act (ESA).  This story was posted online by the Public News Service – Colorado:

Earlier this month the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announced it is classifying the Gunnison sage grouse as threatened. Under a court-ordered agreement, the agency will decide by next year whether to list the greater sage grouse.

Meanwhile the online news service ‘Environmental Protection’ reports:

The National Wildlife Federation on Nov. 19 released results from a poll of sportsmen and women in 11 states in the heart of greater sage-grouse country, with a majority of the respondents supporting efforts to protect the bird and the sagebrush landscape that supports it. A majority backed restrictions in important habitat to save the bird and avoid its placement on the federal Endangered Species List. Such a listing probably would lead to more stringent, long-term constraints on activities as hunting, fishing, recreation, and grazing, said John Gale, NWF's national sportsmen's campaign manager.

"First and foremost, it's critical that we save this iconic Western wildlife species," he said. "We can do that with strong conservation plans that protect key greater sage-grouse habitat while allowing responsible energy development, grazing, and other activities on other public lands."

He pointed to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announcement last week that it is classifying the Gunnison sage-grouse as threatened to keep it from going extinct. The Gunnison sage grouse is smaller than the greater sage-grouse and now is found in portions of Colorado and southeastern Utah, which represent only 7 percent of its historic range, according to NWF.

The Durango Herald reported on the Colorado angle

According to survey results, nine out of 10 hunters believe it is important to take action to protect sage-grouse habitat. Almost as many believe protecting the animal will benefit other game species.

Support undoubtedly comes partly from the recognition that protecting sage grouse habitat is good for wildlife more broadly. And since the habitat lies mostly on public lands, stakeholders—including the State of Colorado–need to step up and protect the bird’s habitat quickly.  The ‘Environmental Protection’ article continues:

Land Tawney, executive director of Backcountry Hunters & Anglers, said because most of the greater sage-grouse's habitat is on public lands, BLM and states where the bird is found must step up now. "It's not just about the bird; it's about the herds of mule deer and pronghorns, the hunting and other recreation made possible by healthy habitat," Tawney said.

Protecting priority habitat for the Greater Sage-Grouse benefits more than just that species, and if done right should not unduly impact other activities. 

NWF said the survey followed a recent report showing that almost none of the important greater sage-grouse habitat is currently home to any energy production and that 73 to 81 percent of areas with medium to high potential for energy development are outside the bird's habitat.

None of that is to say, of course, that we don’t need to act to put real, tangible and serious protections in place: we do.  The bottom line is Colorado needs to show it can adequately protect habitat for the Greater Sage-Grouse. 

From the Durango Herald story:

“Coloradans really care about their wildlife and public land,” [Colorado Wildlife Federation’s Suzanne] O’Neill said. “At the same time, they care about other uses of the land, and they’d like to see a balance. In this case, it will require collaboration among the state, BLM and many other stakeholders.”

The federal government will make a decision in 2015 whether or not to list the Greater Sage-Grouse.  With strong support for protecting the bird's habitat, its Colorado's opportunity to act now to show the feds it can adequately do that and avoid the listing. 

Comments

5 thoughts on “Clock Still Ticking on the Greater Sage-Grouse

  1. This is a big deal.  I have been in and out of Montana the past month as a spokesman on this issue.  The key to a beneficial outcome is a thorough review of the state BLM plans (all 11 states) by the FWS well-in-advance of the September '15 deadline.  As you can imagine, harmonizing those 11 state plans with some level of consistency is no easy task.  Montanans (as we are in Colorado) are taking a very proactive approach to avert a listing – all forms of public acess (hiking, camping fishing and hunting) account for a little over $1 billion to their state economy annually.

  2. Coloradans have been working together to save the sage grouse. The feds don't care about any of that. That's why Democrats and Republicans both say back off.

    1. With all respect, the feds are still waiting and watching the state reactions.

      The feds de-listed the wolf largely at the reqest of the states, and only re-implemented a protection plan for Wyoming after the state willfully aimed hunters at the wolf population there.

      USFWS tends to act slowly on listing species – these days it seems it's more often by court order than by their own initiative. Let's see what we can come up with as a concerned community and see what the feds do before crying foul.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

238 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!