CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
December 29, 2014 10:13 AM UTC

Don't Look Now, But Obama's Back

  • 12 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols
You were saying?
You were saying?

Commentator Bill Scher writes for Real Clear Politics today:

After a lame-duck period in which we’ve seen a Cuba thaw, a China climate deal, and an undocumented immigrant reprieve, President Obama was awarded with his highest approval ratings in many months. His popularity has ticked up since November, with young voters, women and—most notably—independents accounting for the boost.

“How can this be?” Republicans must be wondering. They just seized the Senate with a campaign based on little else but attacking incumbent Democrats for voting with Obama. Why are Americans rewarding him now? It’s a question Republicans should think long and hard about before they fully take over Congress next week.

Obama’s increased popularity is a reminder that voters did not rebuff him in November solely on ideological grounds, but also out of frustration with a dysfunctional Washington unable to address long-standing national problems. [Pols emphasis] When Obama is seen blowing through the roadblocks, that frustration dissipates.

RCP's poll average of President Barack Obama's approval rating slipped underwater in May of 2013, and since then the president's approval numbers have been locked in a pretty consistent ten-point deficit. It will take some time for these most recent approval numbers to chip away at that average, but where the President was polling in the low forties and even upper thirties as recently as the middle of this month, three new polls show Obama in the 46-48% range.

There's no question that dissatisfaction with President Obama played a large role in Democratic losses in this year's midterm elections. That said, public perception of who is to blame for the federal government's dysfunction swings back and forth based on a fickle news cycle. Right after the GOP's 2013 shutdown of the federal government, that party overwhelmingly took the blame in public opinion polls. In the period between the shutdown and this year's elections, however, Obamacare's rollout problems helped undo the damage the GOP suffered from the shutdown. Relentless Republican attacks on the Affordable Care Act, along with a raft of other allegations that ultimately came to nothing–Benghazi, Lernergate, Ebola–helped shift the mantle of dysfunction back onto Democrats and the Obama administration through the election. Republican candidates like Colorado's Cory Gardner hyped these nothingburgers to the utmost, while promising that they themselves would be different:

Successful Republican campaigns in swing states captured the frustrated mood of the electorate. When Colorado’s Cory Gardner attacked Sen. Mark Udall’s partisanship, he focused not on criticism of Democratic positions but on his own  pledge to get things done in a bipartisan fashion.

“When my party is wrong, I’ll say it,” Gardner vowed. “When something is broken, I’ll fix it.”

Today, with the election over, Obama's highly productive few weeks are reminding voters what a functioning government looks like, and the voters appear to be rewarding him. Meanwhile, Gardner has already broken faith with progress-minded voters after his vote against President Obama's action on immigration. Would it have been better for Obama to have taken these actions, especially on immigration, before the election? There's a strong hindsight argument in favor, but it's difficult to say how the public would have reacted during the heated rhetoric of the election season. We could see a full-throated Republican freakout over Obama's immigration executive orders provoking the opposite effect on voters before the election as Obama's action appears to be having now.

What does it mean for 2016? There are a lot of moving parts, but it's clear what the voters want. They want a government that gets things done, and they'll reward who they see challenging the broken system. The other side of that coin is punishment for those who are perceived to be helping break the system down. Nobody likes blame games, but this surely is one–and like it or not, the dysfunction of the last six years in Washington is going to be a major battleground of 2016.

If we were advising Republicans, we would suggest becoming part of the solution for the next two years.

Comments

12 thoughts on “Don’t Look Now, But Obama’s Back

  1. Nah, Obama's not back yet.. he has to dump the TPP deal and annoy the Republicans to a point where they'll finally reveal themselves to the voters that they've earned their single digit approval rating.

    TPP deal is bad from the beginning, and needs to pressure Obama to abandon it.

    Then I'll say he's back and he's ready to rumble.

    1. According to the guy from CBS who tracks these things (can't remember his name, but everyone uses his figures when talking about Presidential vacations)…

      I take as much vacation time each year as Obama has – and I'm not on call (and doing work) when I'm on my vacations like Presidents tend to be.

      You're just jealous because he vacations in his home state of Hawaii.

        1. I remember when Putin was a guest at his East Butthole ranch and was really disappointed that he wasn't going to get to ride horses with the prez because the phony Texas rancher, and the only Bush to affect a phony Texas accent, didn't know how to ride. And, speaking of vacations, everyone should still remember what a hard time his aides had convincing him that he really should interrupt his to take at look at the Katrina devastation. They finally got him to do a fly by by putting together a video. And the golfing? Anyone remember the infamous "now watch this swing" clip? or his statement that he really doesn't spend time worrying his pt pretty little ol' head about about where Bin Laden is?

          I found the most recent days polling pretty shocking. It's been years since he broke even in a Gallup:

          Gallup

          12/27 – 12/29

          1500 A

          48

          48

          Tie

          Rasmussen Reports

          12/23 – 12/29

          1500 LV

          48

          50

          -2

          CNN/Opinion Research

          12/18 – 12/21

          1011 A

          48

          50

          -2

          1. Once again. Sorry about the editing. Anyhow, please note that the average of these three latest polls has him very close to even, after averaging only between 40 and 41 point something approval with 50 + disapproval for a very long time and until very recently. So it seems like the public is responding pretty favorably to his recent "dictatorial" (entirely constitutional) actions and initiatives. 

            Kind of makes you want to kick his and the Dem leadership and candidates' asses for the cowering decisions they let their DLC worshipping advisers talk them into making before the election. Unless Obama actually wanted to get rid of the Dem majority Senate he always seemed to find so annoying. In that case, way to go, Prez. 

    1. It's funny, isn't it. Or at least sad.

      Obama, Clinton, and Carter each spent far fewer days on vacation per year than any of Reagan, Bush 41, or Bush 43. Heck – Carter spent fewer days on vacation in his whole term than any of the Republicans did per year. Obama and Clinton both spent less time on vacation per term (at least at Obama's current rate) than Bush 43 did per year.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

108 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!