(Promoted by Colorado Pols)
Pueblo County's Republican Chair, Becky Mizel, isn't known for pulling her punches, but she hit particularly hard at her fellow Republicans in a recent interview on KNUS' Peter Boyles Show.
The fight roiling the state GOP is reaching a frenzy leading up to the March 14 vote on whether to retain Republican State Chair Ryan Call, and Mizel, who says "people are leaving the Party," thinks a leadership change "at the top" is required to align the money wing of the party with the "majority of the GOP that thinks like we do."
Mizel told Boyles (hear it below) that she's been "calling around to counties all over the state," and she's found out that progressives are out-organizing Republicans, with groups like Colorado WINS and ProgressNow "well-established," even in "counties like Ouray," not known to be a lefty outpost.
The GOP's zeitgeist, if you will, embodied in Mizel, is largely flowing under the media radar, even though the stakes are high. A shift in leadership at the state party could have a huge impact not only on the amount of money raised by Republicans in Colorado but also where GOP money flows.
Mizel: That’s what I really hate about the GOP. There’s that segment of the GOP that controls all of the money, the messaging, and the data. But then there’s the majority of the GOP that thinks like we do. And so, it’s really kind of a sad thing. And people are leaving the party. If we don’t do something to change the leadership at the top, I don’t think there’s not a 3rd party strong enough to win. And so, we’re destined. And the other thing, I’ve been calling around to the counties all over the state, Peter, and, boy, I can tell you, the Democrats have all of their people in place through groups like Colorado WINS and ProgressNow. They are well established in counties like Ouray and Silverton. We don’t even have a clue! Our Republican leadership comes in. They could care less. They only caring about the top of the ticket. They want to control messaging. They want to control dollars. They think your candidates aren’t good enough It’s all about getting the RNC candidates in. It’s not about the county-up. And so we just have to start taking control from the Grassroots up…And people are leaving the Party.
Boyles: Well, they should.
Mizel: I'm not saying the Party is great. But it's their vehicle to get other people elected.
Boyles: …I’ve said this many, many, many times: if the Republican Party puts Jeb Bush as the Presidential hopeful, I WILL vote for Hillary Clinton. I swear to God, I will! I mean, if that’s the best that they can do, and I think it is what they’re going to do. But as an aside, he is– did you see that great line, that “The Bush family really believes in No Child Left Behind. They’re going to run Jeb.” I thought it was a great line. What can people do to help you dump Ryan Call?
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: QuBase
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: The realist
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: kwtree
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: SSG_Dan
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Weekend Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
"if the Republican Party puts Jeb Bush as the Presidential hopeful, I WILL vote for Hillary Clinton. I swear to God"
Yes! Go, Peter, go.
I guess Peter doesn't buy the line: Third time's the charm.
The crazier, the
bettermonier . . . ???I'm Becky Mizel and I may yet become the chairwoman of Pueblo Republicans for Hillary Clinton and I approve of this qualified endorsement………..
Should Republicans worry?
Or will the kids become conservative old farts?
Politics is relative. So today's moderates will become tomorrow's conservatives, even if their opinions stay much the same.
And poltics is cyclical and spirals back to origin, at a higher level. So colonial rights became civil rights (abolition) became union rights became civil rights (voting, segregation) became women's rights became gay rights, and now includes all of these. It's all about empowerment from the bottom up and the inside out, whatever the label.
The rights of people and animals to a clean environment, to a future with arable land and drinkable water and breathable air, underlies all of these now.
As it spirals back again over the next 20 year cycles, who knows what will be included in the definition of "liberal"?
It reminds me of the old saying, a liberal is a consrvative who was mugged. A liberal is a conservative who was wrongfully arrest.
If this idiotic posting system allowed you to edit your posts, you could fixed your typo.
Alas, it does not.
I think you meant: "A conservative is a liberal who was mugged. A liberal is a conserevative who was wrongfully arrested."
Others, including I believe Churchill, said "If you're not liberal (or Socialist in Winnie's version) in your youth, you have no heart. If you're not conservative as you age, you have no head."
No, Vger. I meant what I wrote, and I wrote what I meant. A liberal's faithful….100 percent.
– from "Horton Hears a Who".
Plenty of old liberals and progressives. Proportiobnally fewer young conservatives.
Pueblo GOP voted for Steve House for chair. The rumor is that House is sweeping all of the county part chair elections.