President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) J. Sonnenberg

(R) Ted Harvey

20%↑

15%↑

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

(R) Doug Bruce

20%

20%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

40%↑

20%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
May 20, 2015 08:00 AM UTC

Wednesday Open Thread

  • 11 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

Offer me solutions, offer me alternatives
And I decline

–REM, from It’s The End Of the World As We Know It

Comments

11 thoughts on “Wednesday Open Thread

    1. "… pointed out that it’s too difficult for him to predict his annual income as a self-employed contractor, which is what prevented him from signing up for a plan during previous enrollment periods. He was too nervous about underestimating his income during the enrollment process and being required to pay back his insurance subsidy during tax season."

       

      This is bs.  He could have enrolled without subsidy – then if he qualified at year end, when  (if)  he filed he could claim his subsidy.

      But then he's really upset because his home state didn't expand Medicaid, because he would qualify and he needs it now.  Clearly, his South Carolina neighbors don't care about him and the best move now would be to  move to a state with better acess to healthcare for the (sometimes) working poor. 

  1. Obama had to move to the middle after his election to "govern". This is a DC Beltway Conventional Wisdom assumed truth. If he only knew at the time the great effort almost every R in DC would expend to prevent him from doing anything productive.

    Howard Fineman:

    Is Hillary Clinton actually moving left, and if so, why?

    The answer is yes, though not on every topic. And the reason is to push young voters' turnout and grassroots organizing enthusiasm as close as possible to the levels that President Barack Obama enjoyed in 2008.

    “After two terms of President Obama, it won’t be easy, but our challenge is to again excite the passion of the youngest voters,” Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta told fellow Georgetown Law Center alums at a luncheon last week.

    Six years of trying to be bipartisan with Repubilcans, to the point of passing "their" health care law that they have vowed to repeal "root and branch" "every blasted word" of the "job killing" "deficit exploding" bill that tried to create an affordable health insurance market for those without good insurance.  

    If Obama hadn't made that glaring miscalculation, the fired up, young, and historic base that elected him in '08 would still be there and we wouldn't be contemplating a Bennet vs. Coffman race next year.

    And while we know what the Republican candidate will look like, there’s still time for the Democratic one to expunge those nasty corporate instincts:

    Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders keeps bending the rules of Senate service and presidential campaigning by offering up proposals that imagine America as the fair, functional, and prosperous country it could be. Instead of playing politics within the narrow lines prescribed by the partisans and pundits who police the political process in America, the recently announced contender for the Democratic presidential nomination is going big—this week with a plan to provide tuition-free higher education for students at four-year colleges and universities in the United States.

    “We live in a highly competitive global economy and, if our economy is to be strong, we need the best-educated work force in the world,” says Sanders. “That will not happen if, every year, hundreds of thousands of bright young people cannot afford to go to college, and if millions more leave school deeply in debt.” […]

    According to the Republicans who are running Congress—and running for president—there’s just no money for free higher education. Or for other useful initiatives. In an age of austerity, as defined by House Rules Committee chairman Paul Ryan and his minions, we are told that all Americans have to look forward to are more cuts, more privatization, wage stagnation, and staggering income inequality.
    Ryan and his ideological amen corner moan that there’s just no money for programs that might educate and employ and care for Americans.

    Of course, there is money: trillions of dollars that can be freed up, at the drop of a hat (or a stock market), to bail out banks and fund wars. But Republicans like Ryan and the contenders for his party’s 2016 presidential nomination claim the country is damn-near broke—with just enough money left for one more tax cuts for one more billionaire campaign donor. And, too frequently, America’s “fair and balanced” media and compromised and compromising Democratic Partygo alongwith the fantasy.

    What has distinguished Sanders’s Senate service and his presidential bid is a refusal to buy into the lie of austerity.>

    1. I would hope that one day you will post a diary about your vision for political America.  Are you a socialist? communist? Do you support or resist the dominance of the two party system? Was Ralph Nader a presidential spoiler, or was the D nomminee that cycle just not liberal enough to win?  How do you propose a far left liberal progressive candidate win the electoral math? (Appeal only to the smart voters doesn't count as an answer.)  If you had to choose one public policy in the history of the USA (which, really, we should give back to the inhabitants who immigrant ancestors overran) as the most important and the model for how other public policy should be modelled – which would it be?

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

86 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!