CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
May 26, 2015 05:00 PM UTC

Morgan Carroll CD-6 Buzz Continues To Build

  • 6 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols
Senate Minority Leader Morgan Carroll.
Senate Minority Leader Morgan Carroll.

Roll Call’s Alexis Levinson reports today on growing Democratic excitement in Washington, D.C.–and trepidation from Republicans–about a possible run by Colorado Senate Minority Leader Morgan Carroll for incumbent Rep. Mike Coffman’s CD-6 seat:

Coffman has proved resilient over his four terms. He has been a top Democratic target since redistricting reshaped his solidly Republican district into a more competitive one. After a tight race in 2012, defeating his opponent by 2 points, he easily toppled former state Speaker Andrew Romanoff by 9 points last fall…

State Senate Minority Leader Morgan Carroll, term-limited out of her seat, has emerged as the top choice over the past few weeks. She has met with the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and she attended the House Democratic Caucus meeting last week, shadowing Rep. Jared Polis during her time at the Capitol, according to a source with knowledge of her visit. Carroll has a reputation as a strong fundraiser, and represented the area as a member of the state House and while practicing law there.

That profile alone makes her appealing to Colorado Democrats, who say one of the problems the past two cycles was running two white men who were viewed as carpetbaggers.

“With Hillary [Rodham Clinton] at the top of the ticket, having a woman candidate only makes sense,” said Colorado Democratic consultant Laura Chapin. [Pols emphasis]

The only downside Roll Call speculates about with Sen. Carroll relates to her voting record in the legislature, and the likelihood of “gotcha” attacks on votes she’s taken similar to what we’ve seen leveled against Coffman’s last two CD-6 opponents. As we’ve noted, however, the big difference this time is Sen. Carroll’s willingness–even eagerness–to run on her record, and to articulately defend both her career and the progressive ideals she has always campaigned on.

Unlike 2014’s Andrew Romanoff, Carroll is not a Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) “milquetoast” Democrat who will shy away from her principles, and that may be exactly the edge against the aggressively reinvented Coffman that she needs to avoid Romanoff’s fate. It’s worth remembering, and we’ll have many occasions to point it out in the months ahead, that the victories both Coffman and Sen. Cory Gardner enjoyed last year were primarily the result of those candidates flanking their opponents on the left–a tactic that Carroll’s unambiguous progressive record renders ineffective.

Sources tell us that as of this writing, Carroll is “leaning toward” entering the CD-6 race. The increasing likelihood of a tough challenge for CD-6 is reportedly giving both Coffman and national Republican strategists pause, delaying what may once have been an easy decision for Coffman to step up to the U.S. Senate race in 2016–though there is debate on this point as well, with some close to the decision maintaining that he has always been unsure about challenging Michael Bennet.

As of now, Coffman and Republican strategists have an additional worry.

Comments

6 thoughts on “Morgan Carroll CD-6 Buzz Continues To Build

  1. If Coffman stays in CD6 he's very unlikely to be unseated by Carroll but he's also probably the best (maybe only) choice to unseat Bennet. If he leaves to run for the Senate seat, he has a pretty good but hardly guaranteed chance there and Morgan Carroll would have the best chance any Dem has had since redistricting, a very strong chance, of taking CD6 with no incumbent Coffman in the way. Guess Coffman and the party have to decide whether to go big or play it safe

    1. This is pretty much right, but I wouldn't count Morgan out of a head-to-head match against Coffman. If he moves to the Senate race she wins, but if he stays the GOP could lose it all. That's an awesome prospect…

      1. I actually think there is a greater chance of losing it all if Coffman switches to the Senate race where it will be tougher for him to unseat Bennet than to keep his seat in CD6. Since 2016 is pretty much the opposite of 2014 in terms of Senate seats up for election, conferring the advantage that Rs had in 2014 on Dems this time around, it could be very tempting to the Colorado GOP and pro ops to go big for overthrowing Bennet in an R adverse year. Higher risk but higher potential reward. Feather in everyone's caps if they succeed.

        Depending on how ambitious Coffman is, it could be tempting for him, too. He doesn't strike me as the risk taking type, though, and running to keep his seat is the safest route for him. Also, pretty sure the state and national party knows that once the newly configured CD 6 falls to a Dem it probably can't be won back in the foreseeable future. Demos make it more of a fit for Dems with Coffman hanging in there due to incumbency and being a high name rec home boy. But they can afford to lose a seat in the House which is in no danger of going Dem majority. A Senate seat sounds like it would be worth the trade off and the degree of risk. Bennet isn't a sure thing.

        It will be interesting to see what the ultimate decision will be. Go Big or stay safe.  

  2. I find it interesting, Alva, that you tag Romanoff with the sobriquet "milquetoast ," when I've never seen you apply the same to our champion of progressivism, Sen. Bennett??? 

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

138 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!