In another edition of our long-running feature, “At Least He’s Not Your Legislator,” we visit our idiot neighbors to the East. As the Associated Press reports:
A dress code imposed by a Kansas Senate committee chairman that prohibits women testifying on bills from wearing low-cut necklines and miniskirts is drawing bipartisan ridicule from female legislators.
Sen. Mitch Holmes’ 11-point code of conduct does not include any restrictions on men, who he said needed no instruction on how to look professional.
Yup.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Who Will Win the Republican Vacancy Appointment in CO-04?
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Who Will Win the Republican Vacancy Appointment in CO-04?
BY: Gilpin Guy
IN: Who Will Win the Republican Vacancy Appointment in CO-04?
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Who Will Win the Republican Vacancy Appointment in CO-04?
BY: NOV GOP meltdown
IN: It’s Official: Colorado Republicans Need A New Lawyer
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: davebarnes
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Get More Smarter on Thursday (March 28)
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Yes, Please: Guns Out Of The State Capitol
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
If he's too distracted maybe he ought to quit in favor of a grown up.
This is like Islam shaming women for being too provocative to men, so they must cover up with the hijab, burqa, etc. Patriarchal, sexist victim blaming.
Let’s not ever fail to point out the parallel. There is a war on women, and it’s based in religious fundamentalism.
Which is, of course, not even why the original call to go covered was issued.
All religious fundamentalism.
Ruh-roh. It looks like Sharia Law just came to Kansas.
Burqas for the ladies, Bolo ties for the gents …
… you can't get any more professional than that !!!