CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
March 29, 2016 01:21 PM UTC

Hospital Provider Fee: Principle or Politics?

  • 2 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols
Sen. Larry Crowder.
Sen. Larry Crowder.

Yesterday, Democrats in the Colorado House rolled out long-awaited legislation to reclassify the state’s hospital provider fee into a TABOR-exempt enterprise: a technical fix that would allow to the state to avoid painful budget choices: if not this year as revenue forecasts change than in future years. And as the Colorado Independent’s Corey Hutchins reports, there’s a twist:

What’s the big takeaway? That a Republican is a sponsor in the Senate, bucking both his party’s leadership and the conservative group Americans for Prosperity— on an issue that’s been framed since January as the biggest political battle of the year…

[Sen. Larry] Crowder, the Republican sponsor and an Alamosa farmer, was the only Republican to buck his party in 2013 when he voted in favor of expanding Medicaid.

In the days leading up to today’s introduction of the bill, Crowder had been coy about whether he would vote to reclassify the hospital provider fee into an enterprise if he had the chance. While he’s been clear on some aspects — he believes, for instance, unlike other Republicans, that reclassifying the fee is constitutional — he said as recently as last week that he’d have to wait and see a bill before committing to how he’d vote.

Now his name is on the bill.

GOP Sen. Larry Crowder’s very public spat with conservative group Americans for Prosperity over the hospital provider fee earlier this session turned a lot of heads–but as the Denver Post’s John Frank reports, Crowder’s support for the “fix,” which technically gives it the votes to pass the Senate, means nothing if Senate President Bill Cadman never allows it to reach the full Senate:

The co-sponsor of the bill is Sen. Larry Crowder, a Alamosa Republican who is breaking ranks to sponsor the bill. The Republican-controlled Senate remains opposed to the bill — Hullinghorst called it a “stalemate” — meaning it is unlikely to advance to the governor’s desk this session, despite Crowder’s support which gives it enough votes to pass if it made it to the floor.

Senate President Bill Cadman, R-Colorado Springs, declined to comment on the legislation Monday.

Politically however, there may be more going on here than meets the eye. Crowder’s SD-35 seat is relatively high on the list of Democratic pickup opportunities this year, with a strong Democratic challenger in Las Animas County Sheriff Jim Casias. There’s a nagging possibility that Crowder’s support for the provider fee fix is nothing more than political theater, creating an illusion of “independence” from Crowder’s own GOP Senate leadership.

We would be happy to be wrong about this, and there certainly are ways Cadman and/or Crowder could prove us wrong. But if Crowder goes back to SD-35 voters with the story of how he tried to get GOP leadership to pass this fix, those voters just might realize how voting out Crowder could change Senate leadership too.

And that could make more of a difference to them than anything Crowder can say.

Comments

2 thoughts on “Hospital Provider Fee: Principle or Politics?

  1. Um, well, Senator Crowder joined the 17 Dems in the last session to kill one of the public land land grab bills on the Senate floor. What I like about Senator Crowder; as a fellow Republican; is that he doesn’'t always toe the Caucus line. How about waiting to see how things shake out with the provider fee?

  2. If he really cares about SD 35, why'd he vote cut retirement benefits for PERA (SB 80)? SD 35 has the largest amount of people on PERA than any other SD.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

125 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!