President (To Win Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(D) Kamala Harris
(R) Donald Trump
80%↑
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) V. Archuleta
98%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Marshall Dawson
95%
5%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd
(D) Adam Frisch
50%
50%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert
(D) Trisha Calvarese
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank
(D) River Gassen
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) John Fabbricatore
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen
(R) Sergei Matveyuk
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(R) Gabe Evans
52%↑
48%↓
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
April 22, 2016 01:30 PM UTC
13 Comments
Please show me where the words "transvaginal ultrasound" appear in the bill. More Democrat scare tactics like "banning birth control."
…yaps our pro-war, gut the safety net, who has a right to clean air and water Faux-lifer.
… the documented results of a childhood drinking "Mountain Dew from a sippy cup".
I cannot have an empty comment
"Transvaginal" doesn't appear in the bill text. But "ultrasound" occurs at least 18 times. It's a very poorly-written bill – it attempts to cover every eventuality, such as a woman not having the means to purchase an ultrasound exam, unavailability of an ultrasound exam, etc. It puts in place 24 hour waiting period while the woman "thinks about" the ultrasound results, looks at a printout of it, has to listen to a spiel about alternatives to abortion, etc, etc.
Read the intent which is clear in the bill. Apparently you;re not a woman. OK. Excuse you. This bill needed to die once again – it's unnecessary, an invasion on private lives and expensive. Redirect your thoughts toward protections against prostrate cancer, getting more Viagra, etc. You obviously can't understand these implications.
There's only one thing he understands, physiologically …
… if there's ever a colon bill introduced in Colorado, he'll be the undisputed expert witness.
LOL!
Sounds like you're Akin for a mix up there Moddy. http://www.lawyerherald.com/articles/43747/20160425/south-carolina-viagra-bill-abortion-double-standards.htm
Yes indeed, shrink government down to where it fits into a woman's uterus.
Or penis and testicles – lets not evoke gender envy or worse, gender discrimination!
It definitely tries to cover "everything?|"….even if the the woman miscarries. It states that the woman shall receive (page 7)(C) A WRITTEN AND ORAL DESCRIPTION STATING WHETHER OR NOT THE WOMAN HAS A VIABLE PREGNANCY, THE LOCATION OF THE FETAL SAC (all found only through TVU), AND THE PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF A HEARTBEAT. IF THE PREGNANCY IS NOT VIABLE, THE ABORTION PROVIDER SHALL ADVISE THE WOMAN THAT SHE WILL MISCARRY WITH NO FURTHER INTERVENTION UNLESS THE ABORTION PROVIDER HAS EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY. This even tells the provider what to say.
This statement is confirmation of a Transvaginal Ultrsound:
2 (a) (I) page 6: (a) (I) THE OPPORTUNITY TO RECEIVE A PICTURE OF A CURRENT ULTRASOUND OF THE UNBORN CHILD PORTRAYING THE ENTIRE BODY OF 2 THE UNBORN CHILD,
As and RN, I find all of this type of intervention DISGUSTING!!!!! INTRUSIVE!!!!! ABUSIVE!!!!!! and GENDER DENIGRATING!!!!! It is clear to me that any woman demanding this of another woman is sadistically hyper-sexualized and needs psychiatric help. Any male that thinks this is appropriate needs to have a tube shoved up their penis to check for syphilis so they don't spread it and because their cognitive reasoning has been lost to other parts.