CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
August 16, 2016 10:32 AM UTC

Get More Smarter on Tuesday (August 16)

  • 15 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

Get More SmarterDid you remember to celebrate the anniversary of the opening of the Panama Canal on Monday? It’s time to Get More Smarter with Colorado Pols! If you think we missed something important, please include the link in the comments below (here’s a good example). If you are more of a visual learner, check out The Get More Smarter Show.

TOP OF MIND TODAY…

► Democratic Presidential nominee Hillary Clinton has asked former Interior Secretary and longtime Colorado politico Ken Salazar to lead her White House transition team. From the Denver Post:

As head of a lineup that includes former Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm and former National Security Advisor Tom Donilon, Salazar will be in charge of meeting with Obama administration officials and preparing for a smooth handoff between presidents.

The role has become more official in recent years; transition staff will meet regularly with White House officials and use workspace provided by the General Services Administration.

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie was tapped by Donald Trump in May for a similar assignment. “Once Hillary Clinton makes history by being elected as the nation’s first woman President, we want to have a turnkey operation in place so she can hit the ground running right away,” Salazar said in a statement released Tuesday by the Clinton campaign.

By leading Clinton’s transition team, Salazar is in prime position to nab a key role in a potential Clinton Administration. This is a significant development for Colorado, as well, as Salazar has long been rumored to be preparing a bid for Governor in 2018. If Salazar were to land a top job in the Clinton Administration, it would likely preclude him from running for Governor.

 

► Republicans are adopting a strange new strategy when it comes to Republican Presidential nominee Donald Trump. New Hampshire Sen. Kelly Ayotte rolled out the newest talking point on Monday, saying that she will be voting for Trump for President, but vows to “stand up to him” if elected.

 

► It may not qualify as the first rule of politics in Colorado, but it should definitely be in the Top 5: Never use pictures of non-Colorado mountain ranges in literature or video campaign advertisements.

 

Get even more smarter after the jump…

IN CASE YOU ARE STANDING NEAR A WATER COOLER…

► This probably won’t come as a yuge surprise to anyone, but Donald Trump is having trouble articulating his foreign policy views without contradicting…Donald Trump. As “The Fix” explains:

Lots and lots of what Trump said yesterday about his foreign policy views stands in direct contrast to what he has said about those same topics in the past. From Iraq to Libya and back, Trump is adopting positions that are 180 degrees from what he said a few years ago…

…The simple fact is that Trump’s views on Iraq as well as on a number of other foreign policy issues are at odds with what his positions were just a few years ago. That he says they aren’t is, well, wrong.

Trump’s tendency to rewrite history in ways that are favorable to him and to re-work — to be kind — his policy stances to fit the moment are two pillars of his campaign to date.  He knew better than all the professional politicians about everything  — and said so at the time! The facts, however, don’t bear that revisionism out.

Producers from NBC’s “Morning Joe” broke down Trump’s back-and-forth foreign policy claims in a nifty little video:

 

► Elsewhere, conservative policy experts are growing increasingly concerned about Trump’s apparent lack of knowledge on…well, public policy in general. From the Washington Post:

“God help us,” George Shultz said yesterday when asked about the prospect of a Donald Trump presidency.

Ronald Reagan’s secretary of state has compiled a 226-page “Blueprint for America,” with contributions from 10 scholars at the Hoover Institution—the conservative-leaning think tank where he is a distinguished fellow. The book is intended to provide the next president with advice about how to ensure America’s long-term greatness, including sections on the importance of an open immigration system, free trade and entitlement reform.

But it is a little awkward because the GOP nominee is running against each of those three concepts. He also seems uninterested in the finer points of policy-making.

 

► Trump’s Colorado campaign continues to add staff. Better late than never, we suppose.

 

► Your General Election ballot will likely be overflowing with statewide and local ballot measures…except in Aurora. The Aurora City Council decided not to move forward with placing a question about red-light traffic cameras on the fall ballot, which means that no Aurora-centric measures will be included in November.

 

► A question about end-of-life options in Colorado will be on the statewide ballot. Initiative #145 asks voters to allow terminally ill patients in Colorado to consult with physicians for “Medical Aid in Dying.”

 

► Another day, another new poll showing a huge lead for Hillary Clinton over Donald Trump. A new poll from the Washington Post shows Clinton with a 15-point lead in the key swing state of Virginia.

 

To caucus, or not to caucus. That is still a question among Republicans — particularly those who attended the annual Red State Gathering last weekend.

 

► Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane has been found guilty on all charges related to a perjury and obstruction case. Kane, a Democrat, says she will appeal the verdict as calls for her resignation begin to grow.

 

► Brandon Rittiman of 9News tries to follow the weed tax money.

OTHER LINKS YOU SHOULD CLICK

► Conservative talk radio in Colorado often contains plenty of absurd rhetoric, but it doesn’t often get this absurd: Dan Maurer of 560 AM says he would prefer KKK leader David Duke as President instead of Democrat Hillary Clinton. Duke isn’t running for President — though he is an official candidate for U.S. Senate in Louisiana.

ICYMI

► Crested Butte native Emma Coburn became the first American woman to win a medal in the steeplechase event on Monday. Coburn captured the Bronze medal in the 3,000 meter race.

 

 

Get More Smarter by liking Colorado Pols on Facebook!

Comments

15 thoughts on “Get More Smarter on Tuesday (August 16)

  1. Brandon Rittimans pot tax flow chart: (available on Scribd for us visual learners). So the first 40% goes to school construction upgrades, especially in rural districts. Maybe I'll finally get screens on my windows.  However, 12% of this fund is reserved for charter schools, even though the title is "Public School Capital Construction Assistance Fund". How did that work?

    I took out the image because all I saw here were bubbles and arrows – no labels. But you can find it on scribd at https://www.scribd.com/document/321267721/Flow-Chart-Marijuana-Revenue-04-06-2015-Plain

      1. As I'm sure you should know, V, not all charter schools are public schools, although most receive some public funding. They may also receive private funding, and do not have to accept all who apply, leading to the charge that they cherry-pick their students. Kipp Academies, for example, are infamous for accepting special education students to fluff up their October counts, then expelling the students when /if they become disciplinary problems.

        Teacher's unions and due process protections usually do not apply in charter schools. Often, depending on the state, teachers do not even have to have teaching degrees, although parents are not necessarily informed of this limitation. Students do not necessarily have the same constitutional protections as those in real public schools, either.

        From Bruce Baker's School Finance 101 blog:

        The fact that many state charter laws and federal regulatory references to charter schools refer to them as “public” is a hollow proclamation that has little legal or practical bearing on the more nuanced distinctions I address here.

        Those who casually (belligerently & ignorantly) toss around the rhetoric that “charters are public schools” need to stop. This rhetoric misinforms parents, teachers and taxpayers regarding their rights, assumptions and expectations.

         

         

        1. Baker's special interest propaganda doesn't chnge the fact that charter schools are public schools.  If they are private, why go through the rigamarole.  Even your own alexander story confirms that. Charter schools are public schools.

          1. Now you're just playing word games. All  "charter schools" have a "charter", that is a mission approved by the Colorado Department of Education. The amount of public funding can go from 20-30% for federally funded programs to 100%.

            There are also 100% private schools, which still have a charter from the CDE, but receive zero funds because they have a religious mission. Woods, et al, would like to change that so that private religious schools can get more federal $$.

            So if your little word games require you to say that if a school gets 20-30% public funding, it is now a "public school", then go for it. I don't buy it, and neither do most teachers

            Point is, marijuana tax money should not be funding privately funded charter schools. The whole way amendment 64 was sold to the public was that we would be using 40% of the "sin tax" on cannabis to improve the educational opportunities for low-income kids and fixing our crappy school infrastructure that TABOR had kept in limbo for so long.

            Charter schools which receive most or all of their funding from private foundations or fees typically do not serve low-income kids. They should not be benefiting from the "weed tax".

            1. Word games?  Sorry but when people talk about charter schools they are referring in the main to public charter schools. Lots of things have charters. Generally the types of schools under discussion are standard public, public charter and private in relation to proposed voucher systems. Certainly if you're talking about any school system's charter schools, such as DPS charter schools, you are talking about schools that are part of the DPS system, not private schools.

            2. If they are created under state laws under the aegis of public school boards and get public funds, they are public schools.  If they get extra private funds, great, they still don't charge tuition.  If teacher union control is necessary to make a school public, I doubt that any rural school would qualify.  Most large districts are unionized, most small ones aren't.  But Holyoke is still very much a public school./p>

              1. Cannabis taxes should not go to privately funded educational entities that discriminate against poor and special needs kids. Only 100 percent public funded schools, charter or not, should get public funds.

                1. I never use facebook.  I actually opened an account but never went back.  Your theory that only 100 percent tax supported schools should get extra tax support is untenable.  It wouls mean turning down every philanthropic grant like bill gates and probably banning pta bake sales.   Sorry, that is just silly.

  2. This certainly doesn’t look good for Obamacare

    Just a few months ago, Aetna was an insurer you could count on to be especially bullish on Obamacare.

    Chief executive Mark Bertolini told Aetna shareholders in April that the law was "a good investment." In May, he announced plans to expand to five additional states.

    But Aetna made a sharp about-face on Obamacare this month. Last week, the insurer scrapped that expansion plan, citing millions in losses on the marketplaces. And on Monday, Aetna announced it would quit 11 states it currently sells in, remaining in just four markets.

    1. I never though it would work without a public option or that mandate without public option would do anything but keep us at the mercy of for profit insurers.

      In the beginning I was pleased to see improvements  in terms of the situation with pre-existing conditions, companies not being able to drop you when you got sick and less profitable and that for myself, someone who has to get insurance privately, it made the same crappy high deductible high copay I had significantly more affordable but that's disappearing fast. It never gave me r our popuation as a whole access to real quality healthcare at an affordable cost. I'll finally be able to get that with Medicare soon.

      The only real solution will be when we all have that as our basic birth right package and can add more if we want, like in every other modern industrialized country on the planet and some not so modern ones..

      My husband is already on it and it's the best coverage he's had since before we became self employed. ACA  isn't enough. The Colorado plan isn't enough and besides it doesn't belong in the state constitution any more than Medicare belongs in the US constitution.For profit blood sucking insurers  never were or will be the answer. Choice is a delusion. We have no choice as to whether we're going to develop a serious illness or condition. We have no choice but to live in bodies that require maintenance. Healthcare should not be a treated like any other product or service. 

      This was completely foreseeable.

       

  3. Email just received from Mike Coffman:  Bad NewsAlert: Morgan Carroll has just reserved $1.2 million in fall television advertising.

    Read em and weep, Mikey.  Maybe your rich friend Trump can help you out?

     

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

200 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!