Notable Links



Denver Internet Marketing by Parallel Path

Knowledge Messenger

Arvada Boutique Clothing Store Stella B's

Announcement of My Candidacy in HD 28

by: Steve Harvey

Sun Jun 28, 2009 at 22:32:24 PM MDT


(Lame duck promotion at its best - promoted by redstateblues)

We are often drawn to our differences, but politics can and should be the art of finding our common ground. There are certain things almost all people want: We all want to live well and we all want to live free. People of good will want to be fair to others, and most people want to be safe. We want these things for ourselves, for our loved ones, and, if we are reasonably generous, for our neighbors and friends as well. In our noblest moments, some of us want them even for our enemies. We dream, we strive, we aspire, we work, we play, we love, we hope. We share more that binds us than that divides us.
Steve Harvey :: Announcement of My Candidacy in HD 28
I am running for the Colorado House of Representatives, House District 28 in South Jeffco, because I believe that we do not just do these things as individuals, but also as members of a community, of a state, of a nation, and of a world. This dichotomy of our existence, that we are both autonomous individuals who cherish our freedom and, at the same time, interdependent members of a larger society bound together by mutual responsibilities and shared consciousness, is the source of our vitality, the essence of what it means to be human.

I have spent my life studying, experiencing, and exploring this dichotomy in a variety of ways, as a soldier, as a teacher, as a student, as a novelist and essayist, as a father and husband and son and brother, as a friend and neighbor and colleague. I believe that reasonable people of good will can transcend the narrow ideologies at the poles of this dichotomy, and can instead seek the arrangements most conducive to the real human liberty that is not mere freedom from society, but rather freedom supported and facilitated by a well-formed society.

Having researched, written, and published a novel that explored these themes; having taught, among other subjects, U.S. History, World History, U.S. Government, World Geography, Social Problems, and Complex Organizations; having studied economics (as a sociologist) and now having turned to the study of law, I have rediscovered the passion that was even more fundamental to me than my literary goal, and was the driving force behind it: the passion to participate intentionally and purposefully in a world we are forever in the act of making.

I have striven in my life to cultivate knowledge and wisdom in myself and others. Now I want to serve this great human enterprise in another way, by helping to channel our disparate and disparately informed wills into the shared endeavor of maintaining an intelligent, effective, and responsive state government.

I am focusing my campaign on three interrelated themes: My commitment to high quality public schools and affordable access to higher education; my commitment to continuing to develop and maintain a robust economy in Colorado, emphasizing the new energy economy; and my commitment to ensuring that the legal environment is ever-more conducive to the success of small business owners and entrepreneurs, who are the backbone of the state economy.

While, like any applicant in a job interview appealing to the judgment of my prospective employers, I have emphasized why I am well suited to this position, no one can doubt that I believe deeply in "the genius of the many," as my signature line has long proclaimed. I desire, as I always have, to be a servant to that genius, cultivating it in our young, and heeding its counsel as it finds expression through the various processes, both systematic and chaotic, by which it is formed. I do not seek to impose a single will on others, but rather to participate in the formation of the aggregation of our individual wills, which emerges most effectively from the combination of passionate debate and a shared commitment to the common welfare. This process is vital, robust, and productive.

We are, individually and collectively, forever a work in progress, honed by the challenges we face and the solutions we forge. I believe that the human mind and spirit is one of Nature's greatest wonders, made more wonderful by every generous deed, by every disciplined thought, by every collective effort, and by the mutually responsible pursuit of individual success and fulfillment.

I would be honored by the opportunity to participate in this shared endeavor of ours as the representative of House District 28 to the Colorado General Assembly, working diligently and faithfully to enact your will in our ongoing shared effort to produce an every more robust, sustainable, and just economy, and to provide our children and young adults with the opportunity to learn and become productive and prosperous participants in that economy. I ask for your support.

Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Issues and Policies
Please, send me an email (or post in this diary) with suggestions of what issues you think are not being addressed (for instance, I was recently told about an issue regarding the transfer of credits from military occupational training to civilian institutions), and what policies you think would best address them. I will create an evolving spread sheet containing such information, especially looking for interactions among issues. I think that this can become a very valuable legislative resource.

I can be reached at steven.harvey@colorado.edu. Campaign contributions can be sent to (and checks made out to):

Committee to Elect Steve Harvey
P.O. Box 271085
Littleton, CO 80127

Thanks.

Steve Harvey
Democratic Candidate for HD 28

We're all in this story together: Let's make sure that we write it well.
http://www.steveharveyforcolor...


Your E-mail Account?
Seems to be a University of Colorado account???? Is this legal?

[ Parent ]
Legal, maybe
colorado.edu accounts can be held by CU students and former or retired employees. But they are also held by current employees.

If Mr. Harvey is a current CU employee, it very likely would be a violation of university policy that prohibits the use of university computers and email accounts for political purposes.


[ Parent ]
I am not an employee.
Though I'd like to comment on the pathology of form over substance. While I am careful to violate no campaign laws or regulations, if ever I do, it will be the result of an oversight rather than of malfeasance. We are all on a learning curve, inevitably.

This specific issue that you have raised is an example of "gotchya!" politics, something I have consistently railed against here and elsewhere, even when applied against Republicans. Given the abundant free access to email accounts, this issue you have identified is the triumph of form over substance: It's similar to attacking (or, in this case, simply advising, since I perceive no tone of "attack" in Craig's and Awen's posts) a candidate, while purchasing something for a campaign fundraiser, for taking a penny from the penny dish at the cash register of a company prohibited by amendment 54 from making campaign contributions (if amendment 54 weren't blocked by a preliminary injunction). It could be a technical violation, but it certainly isn't a violation of the spirit or purpose of the law, nor an intentional violation even of the letter of the law. People who go after such things perform an enormous public disservice, and should be roundly rebuked.

I can and will set-up a campaign email account in the near future, at no cost whatsoever. This is the epitome of a non-issue.

We're all in this story together: Let's make sure that we write it well.
http://www.steveharveyforcolor...


[ Parent ]
it will be the result of an oversight rather than of malfeasance
Steve, you do realize, that's what they all say, right?

[ Parent ]
Yep, and it's often true.
My point isn't that it's excusable, particularly if it isn't an empty issue like the one that inspired the comment. My point is that neither or nor anyone else can promise never to err in the adherence to a plethora of rules and regulations that we are learning as we go. My statement was the simple truth: If I err, it will be due to an oversight rather than to intentional malfeasance. Everyone who knows me knows that that is simply a true statement. Since most don't know me, I neither expect nor request that it be accepted by them as indisputable truth. But, truth it is, nonetheless.

Hopefully, we'll never have to test whether the combination of sincerity, reasonable vigilance (I am trying to make myself aware of all campaign laws as I go forward), and a complete lack of any intention to violate any law are enough to placcate the torch-bearing mob if and when I ever slip-up!

We're all in this story together: Let's make sure that we write it well.
http://www.steveharveyforcolor...


[ Parent ]
Could your post and comments possibly be longer?!?!
Because I literally fall asleep while reading them. Less is more, Steve.

[ Parent ]
Yes,
they can possibly be longer.

If you literally fall asleep while reading them, then you probably need the extra sleep, and so I accept your expression of gratitude for this health care service I have apparently provided you.

That's the kind of candidate I am: Serving the needs of Coloradans, including ensuring that they get a good night's sleep!

We're all in this story together: Let's make sure that we write it well.
http://www.steveharveyforcolor...


[ Parent ]
never to err in the adherence to a plethora of rules
The rules can be complicated, but realizing that you shouldn't use a state e-mail account for campaign work should be plain common sense.

And it's not just the torch-bearing mob that cares about things like that. It would be a mistake for you to impugn only "gotcha" or impure motives to people who point out things like that.

In the same vein, be careful using the state seal on your campaign material. That prohibition seems to be a particularly vexing one for legislative candidates.


[ Parent ]
I may have missed it,
but I just searched through Title I, section 45 of the Colorado Revised Statutes, in which Campaign Regulations are listed, and I could find no reference to the prohibition of the use of a state email account in a campaign. Granted, I was unable to find some regulations that I know exist, such as that sitting legislators are prohibited from using their official email account for campaign purposes, and from "campaigning" at the capitol. So I am not yet certain that no such regulation exists.

To me, "common sense" is that an otherwise free and abundant resource is not an issue, since there is no potential for abuse involved. I could have given my yahoo email account (yevrahnevets@yahoo.com), or opened my campaign account before posting. Neither I, nor any branch of the state, nor any portion of the public, has either anything to gain or anything to lose by my use of my student email account, which is currently the one I check most frequently.

I think you and I may define "gotchya!" differently: I don't define it only as a cheap tactic used by those trying to score quick and irrelevant political points (though it is that too), but rather also as paying too much attention to too many "issues" that are too substantively irrelevant, however pure the subjectively experienced motives for doing so may be.

I will, as I intended, promptly open a campaign email account, and will inform all of the address. Until then, feel free to reach me at either of the other accounts I have listed.

If anyone is determined to make an issue out of that, it will provide me with an opportunity to demonstrate my focused attention on matters that actually affect people.

We're all in this story together: Let's make sure that we write it well.
http://www.steveharveyforcolor...


[ Parent ]
determined to make an issue out of that
It's not an issue in itself, but folks will be using attention to detail to determine whether you're an enthusiastic amateur or someone who's serious and capable.

[ Parent ]
Then, as I've said,
they will be highly impressed by my attention to the details of things that affect their lives, and my determination not to waste our limited resources (including the time and attention of their representatives) on things that have absolutely no relevance to their lives.

Concern about abuse of state resources is legitimate, when it's legitimate. It's a distraction from the work that needs to be done when it's merely a parlor game to test my attention to detail.

I have and will continue to demonstrate my attention to detail in knowing all relevant facts regarding all proposed policies, and incorporating all legitimate analyses into my determination of my positions on those policies. That's what serious and capable means to me. I'm not a poodle in a dog show; I'm an applicant to do a job on which I am precisely focused.

You're talking about the candidate down the hall in the checkered suit trying to sell the people a bill of goods, and doing it with all the polish expected of a politician: I'm sure his attention to detail is precisely what you're looking for.

People will vote for me because they want more substance and less form, more commitment to the public welfare and less commitment to appearances, more sincerity and less bullshit. You can vote for the poodle if you want: Others will vote for the man (in this case) with his eye on the ball.

We're all in this story together: Let's make sure that we write it well.
http://www.steveharveyforcolor...


[ Parent ]
You've probably already done this
I would guess, but in the rare event you have not, it's past time to hire or enlist a lawyer familiar with political law for your campaign. And a really good Treasurer that knows all the ins and outs is vital for making sure an inadvertent mistake doesn't end up sinking your political ship.

Do you have a campaign manager hired yet? Maybe it's too soon? I'm assuming you are also assembling people to work in Research, Fundraising and Events, Website Development and Messaging (such as yard signs, mail pieces, campaign lit, et al) and someone to handle press releases?  

--From a "real dick."
by: JO


[ Parent ]
You're right,
all of these things are currently in the works, and currently delegated out. I have two campaign managers, one an experienced strategist, the other an active and well-connected member of the Colorado progressive community. I have a treasurer who has already taken on significant tasks on the campaign's behalf. These three, and others, have been making the arrangements you've talked about.

Though I haven't been inactive: There will be an article on me, and an op-ed by me, in tomorrow's Columbine Courier, for those who are interested.

We're all in this story together: Let's make sure that we write it well.
http://www.steveharveyforcolor...


[ Parent ]
Go ahead and lawyer it to death, Steve
But one thing you'll learn about running for office is that while you're explaining, you're losing.

As an aside, besides looking at the law, look at the CU terms-of-use policy.

Using a state email, legal or not, was politically tone deaf, especially considering that it takes only a few seconds to open a gmail account.

You might not like :gotcha" politics, but if you don't learn to think in those terms, you'll never hold the office to which you aspire.



When I use lots of words, they always form an analysis (and, while producing high volume, also produce high information-density).
--Steve Harvey, 2009


[ Parent ]
I've responded to this already.
There are always plenty of people to make grand pronouncements about what can and can't, what will and won't, occur. They are proven wrong with such astonishing regularity that it is almost reassuring to be subjected to their prognostications.

While you discuss these inevitabilities of yours, I'm going to be demonstrating my grasp of the issues; my analytical prowess; my depth and range of knowledge; my expertise in economics, law, history, and all topics of relevance to state governance; my ability inspire and instill confidence in the vast majority of people with whom I interact; and in general the essential qualities that really matter.

I'm going to win on the merits, just as others who recently "couldn't win" have done.  

We're all in this story together: Let's make sure that we write it well.
http://www.steveharveyforcolor...


[ Parent ]
Explain away, Steve
Just remember that nobody likes a smartass either.

While you're demonstrating all this expertise, you're also making voters feel inferior.

You'll have to learn to connect with people.  That's an art.  There are a lot of really smart people who have lost elections.

So start by telling us, in one sentence of 10 words or less, why you're running for office.  It's the question you'll be asked most often.

When I use lots of words, they always form an analysis (and, while producing high volume, also produce high information-density).
--Steve Harvey, 2009


[ Parent ]
Okay,
In ten words: Because I can make a positive difference in people's lives.

I realized the down-side of posting this announcement here: There are people here whose buttons I've pushed with past posts with which they've disagreed, or whose style has offended them, who have in the past, and would undoubtedly again, exploit any opportunity to pile on. That's okay; it's to be expected, and is a part of political life.

Most people who do know me know me as someone who connects with others very well, with children and young adults and people in their golden years, with people from all walks of life and all corners of the Earth. Come and meet me and find out for yourself.

You're offended that I have answers to your questions that have the potential of making people feel inferior. Sorry about that.

We're all in this story together: Let's make sure that we write it well.
http://www.steveharveyforcolor...


[ Parent ]
Thanks
Because the first sentence of your "why" paragraph above was 45 words long.


When I use lots of words, they always form an analysis (and, while producing high volume, also produce high information-density).
--Steve Harvey, 2009


[ Parent ]
I believe in choice.
Now you get to pick which one you like better,the short version, or the comprehensive one.

We're all in this story together: Let's make sure that we write it well.
http://www.steveharveyforcolor...


[ Parent ]
Ditto
Steve,

Quit picking the fly shit out of the pepper. If you can't see that it's obviously not a good idea to use a state e-mail account when you run for office, then concentrate on law school.


[ Parent ]
I know what you mean.
We certainly don't want to elect people to office who are merely extremely well-versed in the issues, knowledgeable in both the relevant analytical frameworks and bodies of information that apply to those issues, and passionately dedicated to dedicating those personal resources to the improvement of the quality and efficiency of our government services, when that person has failed to pass such a clearly crucial and make-or-break litmus test by temporarily using a law school student email account to receive emails related to the public service career for which he attended law school in the first place.

Good to see we all have our priorities in the right place.

We're all in this story together: Let's make sure that we write it well.
http://www.steveharveyforcolor...


[ Parent ]
It's not a litmus test
It's a smell test. It doesn't smell right.

If the odor is there, voters won't care how knowledgeable you are.

The best response to criticism that you listed a state e-mail account would have been ``Oops. Use this one (e-mail) instead. I'm just getting started and I'm learning.''



[ Parent ]
"It doesn't smell right" only to
people who have spread feces on their nostrils prior to sniffing it. To others not so encumbered, it doesn't smell like anything at all. No one, neither me, nor the public, nor anyone else, gains or loses anything; no interest is compromised, no conflict exists, no integrity impaired, no cost borne, no public servant indebted, no nothing. It's a completely and utterly artificial issue, and those who thrive on it are mere pathogens in the body politic.

You give a whole new meaning to the term "brown-nosing" with nonsense like this.

We're all in this story together: Let's make sure that we write it well.
http://www.steveharveyforcolor...


[ Parent ]
He doesn't get it, does he Gertie?
The difference between brains and common sense, I mean.

When I use lots of words, they always form an analysis (and, while producing high volume, also produce high information-density).
--Steve Harvey, 2009


[ Parent ]
You got that right, Ralphie


[ Parent ]
Please
Steve,

Please just get another e-mail account so people can focus on your issues.

Best.


[ Parent ]
I thought he said, several times already, that he would do so.


[ Parent ]
Not in so many words
Actually, yes, he said he'd set one up "in the near future," and proceeded to lambaste (politely and at length) those who pointed out it's common sense.

Disquisitions ensued on "gotcha" politics, form over substance, his inability to find a ban on using state-owned e-mails in campaign regs, the folly of rules forbidding such a thing when e-mail accounts are free, something about taking a penny from the Amendment 54 jar at the register, a defense of intelligence, a staff roster (without naming anyone), and this:

Neither I, nor any branch of the state, nor any portion of the public, has either anything to gain or anything to lose by my use of my student email account, which is currently the one I check most frequently.

So yes, he's said it several times in everything but Esperanto (give him a day!), but the point was more about sensitivity to gut-check issues, not the damn e-mail.


[ Parent ]
What I wonder...
..is whether CU follows the example of other universities (all private, as far as I know) in encouraging/permitting alumni to use, for all time, a school email address as a collector for all other addresses -- a sort of permanent email address for professional and personal life.  I think some schools back East do so (Ivy-type, gasp!).  Because I know some folks who use these perennial "student" addresses, it did not seem so unusual to me to see someone use a "student" address for personal business.

[ Parent ]
You're absolutely right.
It's not about email.

It's about what people think the word "politics" has to mean, and why, as a result, we elect so many people who are so very good at being "politicians," but not at all good at being public servants.

Everybody is extremely eager to tell me what I have to do to win, some out of good will, some out of malice, some because their identity depends on signalling expertise on the matter. Some of the advice is good, some is bad, and most depends on the context. My responses have less to do with my own evaluation of the particular advice in question than of my evaluation of the intentions for offering it.

Of course I could have responded by saying, "oops, my mistake. I'll correct it right away." But that would have been a dishonest answer, because it merely serves to reproduce what I am most interested in discontinuing. David says I should apologize even when I'm not wrong, and he's right; I will do so far more often than this conversation suggests. But, once in a while, when the issue is petty enough, and the people promoting it are clearly motivated by something other than good will to either me or the public, I think it serves a purpose more important than winning an election to say, "oh, please, get a life."

Sure, I can approach this campaign in the traditional way, and face the traditional results. Or I can demonstrate that I'm not trying to appear to be anything: I am simply offering to serve the state of Colorado to the best of my ability. My ultimate goal is not to get elected, but rather to make a positive contribution to our collective existence. If I run an honest campaign from the heart and lose, I will consider myself to have been more successful than if I run the kind of campaign some here think is necessary and win.

Such things always offend some people's sensibilities, mostly because it challenges fixed perceptions and beliefs. But what kind of person would most people really rather have in office: Those who are willing to be dominated by the most artificial and inconsequential of concerns, or those who refuse to be?

I appreciate this opportunity to define myself as the latter.

We're all in this story together: Let's make sure that we write it well.
http://www.steveharveyforcolor...


[ Parent ]
You are not only verbose, SH, IMHO, you are a pompous ass.


[ Parent ]
Thanks for your in-put. n/t


We're all in this story together: Let's make sure that we write it well.
http://www.steveharveyforcolor...


[ Parent ]
I know that I have to learn to love this kind of thing,
to see the humor in it, but it's really amazing how our social "autoimmune system," just like the biological one, malfunctions so routinely, and with such aggressive and self-destructive determination. The post to which you responded, with this otherwise contentless personal insult, was a simple, straightforward, sincere statement of my deeply felt and passionately held desire to see politics focus more on substance and less on form. To most people, I hope and pray, that's just not such an odious position to hold.

When you look at the cumulative effect of politicians having to tip-toe through the mine field of possible "errors" they can make (misstatements, poor bowling scores, sweating, a piece of clothing askew, etc.), you see something that is not at all trivial. People complain incessantly (and justifiably) about inefficiency in government, and then spend all of their political energy throwing as much gravel into the gears of government as they can.

I get, Dwyer, that you were not responding to my statement above, or even to who and what I am. You were responding to a combination of perceptions and misperceptions of things I've written here in the past, and, I believe, of having had the gall both to correct you when you've tried to misrepresent my postions in service to your already blossoming animosity toward me, and to politely point out your errors of interpretation of a hypothetical statutue I wrote and posted here.

But you're the challenge, and a tough one at that; the white blood cell whose "attack" mode is triggered either erroneously or prematurely, and then relentlessly pursues thereafter. It's one thing to disagree with my well-considered and sincerely held political positions, and even to find my style of presenting them aesthetically displeasing, but then to translate that into such venomous personal disdain, with so little real basis, is something worthy of reflection.

There are a couple of things which I think are pretty transparently clear to nearly everyone who reads my posts on this blog: 1) I am not entering the political ring for "personal profit" in the narrow sense, but rather because I sincerely believe I can contribute to our collective welfare, and that doing so is what gives me the most personal satisfaction. 2) My positions, right or wrong, are not shallow or casually derived, but rather are the result of careful study, observation, and contemplation. When you put those two facts together, you have a person who is sincerely aspiring to be a good and useful public servant. I'm not claiming that there's no ego involvement, or no personal motivation, or that I'm an altruist; I'm just claiming, honestly, that I'm doing this for the right set of reasons, with the right set of tools.

By all means, anyone who disagrees with a position I hold or a statement I make should argue vigorously against that position or against that statement. I not only expect that, but positively desire it. When I'm wrong, as I have been and will be again, I want to be convinced that I'm wrong. When I'm right, I want others to see why the arguments against that position fail. And, more generally and precisely, while we all are in the process of hopefully moving in the direction of being "more right" and "less wrong," I want the policy ideas I am working on, both in my mind and in the political arena, to be honed by incisive challenges which force the defects in those ideas to be acknowledged and addressed.

Whether I'm "a pompous ass" or not is really beside the point. Clearly, there are some people here who find that that sliver of my personality that comes across on this blog is somehow objectionable to them, and there are others who have the opposite reaction. That's fairly normal in human relations: Few people are loved by all, and I am not fortunate enough to be one of them. Luckily for me, that's not my goal in life.

My goal in life is to live a rich and meaningful life in service to humanity. I'm not perfect, and I make lots of mistakes. I learn from some of them. And I keep trying to get it right. I think that's all we should ask of one another, and should be slower to hate, quicker to forgive, and more determined to work together for our collective welfare.

We're all in this story together: Let's make sure that we write it well.
http://www.steveharveyforcolor...


[ Parent ]
My only question is
which one of you is played by Jeff Daniels and which one by Jim Carey?

Sure I get "the difference between brains and common sense:" One is authentic, and one is merely popular. Many (perhaps most) things referred to as "common sense" are actually merely enshrined falsehoods or oversimplifications.

You're trying to convert cynicism into a positive morality: Since people imagine that something that is substantively irrelevant is actually important, to ignore it's importance isn't just a lapse in pragmatism, but rather a moral failing. You're not just saying, "Well, you're going to lose with priorities like those" (not always choosing to legitimate other people's misperceptions in order to curry their favor and thus win their votes) but rather are actually offended that I do not submit to the cynical priorities that you consider to be obligatory.

We're all in this story together: Let's make sure that we write it well.
http://www.steveharveyforcolor...


[ Parent ]
Tell us when your website is up...
good luck Steve!

Steve or anyone saavy with Jefferson County politics,
when is the last time a Democrat has won this seat?  

--From a "real dick."
by: JO


1966
but that was when the district included part of Westminster! John Carroll represented HD 28 as a Democrat. Since then, it's been an unbroken line of Republicans, including former U.S. Rep. Dan Schaefer.

[ Parent ]
I don't know when the last time was,
but I do know that the next time will be in 2010!

Tom Dittemore won over 41% of the vote in 2008 with very little organization, money, or momentum. My campaign already has a good start on all three of those measures.

When I speak to Democrats individually or in groups (such as at my unofficial campaign launch at my house yesterday), and watch their eyes light up as they hear the values and goals we share articulated with reason and passion and a sense of the pragmatic necessities involved in advancing those values and achieving those goals, I know that this is going to be a very successful campaign.

Furthermore, demographic shifts, and shifts in the zeitgeist, are all in our favor. Neighboring districts have gone blue in recent elections for the first time in memory.

But most importantly, I think that most folks really want to put reasonable people of good will into office, people who recognize that the purpose of government is not to sacrifice our values on the alter of blind ideology, nor to thump our chest and challenge the world to a brawl, but rather to strive to increase the robustness, sustainability, and fairness of our economy; and to believe the words in the preamble of our constitution that remind us that we are forever a work in progress, constantly challenged to create an ever more perfect union.

I believe that most of our most of us think that it is more American to lift each other up than to knock each other down. This is what I stand for, and this is what so many Democrats, Republicans, and Independents in my district are looking for: Reasonable, well-informed, non-ideological governance, which is committed to being a partner and an agent of the people, a tool in their tool kit, a means to accomplish certain kinds of tasks that cannot be accomplished by other means.

The ideal toward which I strive is government as a facilitator more than as an imposer; a government that greases the gears of all of our disparate efforts, such that we each have the greatest opportunity for success, and such that our individual successes ripple through the system to facilitate the success of all others. That's what government is all about to me, and that's the vision to which I am committed.

We're all in this story together: Let's make sure that we write it well.
http://www.steveharveyforcolor...


[ Parent ]
And don't forget that Dittemore got 41%
with no organization, not little.

I heard everything he accomplished, he did himself!

I congratulate you, Steve. My opinion of you is that you are honest, thoughtful, and driven (tortured) by your morals.

I will support you in any way I can.  


[ Parent ]
I think your assessment
of Steve is quite accurate. Very well said.

--From a "real dick."
by: JO


[ Parent ]
Thank you, sufimarie and Middle of the Road.


We're all in this story together: Let's make sure that we write it well.
http://www.steveharveyforcolor...


[ Parent ]
You are more than welcome.
You seem like such a good guy to me, with your heart truly in the right place. I probably cannot adequately express how much I admire you for running for office, Steve. Big, big, big thumbs up to you for being willing to put your money where your mouth is.  

--From a "real dick."
by: JO


[ Parent ]
Please Steve
Make sure you have someone really good to mercilessly edit all your campaign lit, especially your fund raising letter, brevity not being your strong suit!  

[ Parent ]
Will do!
But, there's just so much that needs to be said! :)

We're all in this story together: Let's make sure that we write it well.
http://www.steveharveyforcolor...


[ Parent ]
In all seriousness,
this is honestly a concern of mine--the lack of brevity when it comes to answering a question. It takes a certain level of self control to be able to edit one's self and I don't see much evidence of that to date.


--From a "real dick."
by: JO


[ Parent ]
How's this for disciplined brevity?
"Floats like a butterfly effect,
Stings like a sentient being,
The one and the only (except for the comedian, and thousands of others),
Steve Harvey(-ing)!!!"

Okay, I'll work on it....

We're all in this story together: Let's make sure that we write it well.
http://www.steveharveyforcolor...


[ Parent ]
Hehehehee.
Well, it's a good start...

:)

--From a "real dick."
by: JO


[ Parent ]
I want to second MOR....
You will be dealing with the public, not wonks like us.

If I was in CO I'd come work for you.

What happened to law school?  Has it been so long already that you graduated?  

"Collective fear stimulates herd instinct and tends to produce ferocity toward those who are not regarded as members of the herd." -Bertrand Russell


[ Parent ]
One year left,
and I really went to be involved in "public interest law," especially public policy formation. So, I've taken all of the most relevant courses: Colorado State Government; Administrative Law; Legislation Education Law; "Parent, Child, and State" (a class specifically about the triangle of interactions and relationships among these three entities); an environmental security law class; and, on top of the required core classes, a few less state-legislation relevant topics as well (immigration law, criminal procedure). Next semester I'm taking water law, lawyers for social change (having taught social change as a sociology grad student), labor law, and energy law and regulation. This past semester, my externship at the capitol with the Assistant House Majority Leader (Rep. Andy Kerr of Lakewood) was for credit, and next Spring I am lined up to do another externship at the capitol with the Governor's Office of Legal Counsel. So law school is far from irrelevant!

But, you're right, the demands of both law school (and the Bar exam!) and an accelerating campaign are going to be taxing.

As for your using a couple thousand miles as an excuse not to get your butt over here to work on my campaign..., well, it's a pretty good one. Thanks for the thought, though!

We're all in this story together: Let's make sure that we write it well.
http://www.steveharveyforcolor...


[ Parent ]
If I had the time, I'd be proud to work for you
Your intimate knowledge of policy is virtually unparalleled. The House would be hard pressed to find a member as detailed and articulate as you. Good luck.

"What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof." - Christopher Hitchens

[ Parent ]
Amen!
Now, wasn't that brief?

"Collective fear stimulates herd instinct and tends to produce ferocity toward those who are not regarded as members of the herd." -Bertrand Russell


[ Parent ]
I'm not nearly as verbose
and I tend to be as subtle as a brick. Not really a combination suited for politics.

Maybe that's why I like Rahm Emanuel so much.
Steve, my middle finger is at your service.

"What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof." - Christopher Hitchens


[ Parent ]
Thanks, CD.


We're all in this story together: Let's make sure that we write it well.
http://www.steveharveyforcolor...


[ Parent ]
I salute
anyone who throws their life into the meat grinder that is politics. I am not one of those people who believes that all elected officials are corrupt. I know many who have my admiration for their hard work, personal sacrifice, and their willingness to suffer the abuse.

I don't live in HD28, but I have always been impressed with your thoughtful posts on a variety of subjects. Good luck.  


hear hear!
Steve - best of luck.

It takes courage to put yourself out there and ask voters for a job.  Your convictions and ideas will help, but listen to those closer to the trenches, those with political experience in the real world, who offer you help.  But, don't listen to all of them :)

You're getting into the next level. Good luck with all that (Seinfeld line...)!

It sounds like you would be a good legislator and I wish you luck.  Remember, as others here have said, find your message and don't dilute it with highbrow rhetoric.

Just remember all voters aren't students and your message may change...I've had experience with this, so I know what I'm saying.

Finally, a last piece of unwanted and uncalled for advice.  Walk the district, walk the district, walk, walk and walk!

Good luck!

Car 31


[ Parent ]
Thanks, Car 31.
The advice is appreciated. I have already heard all of it, several times, from several people, in person as well as here, and have begun to implement much of it. In person even more than here, it's generally people worrying about how others will react to the academic manner of my speach.

There is certainly a difference between philosophizing on a blog and speaking to constituents, one which I do recognize. I try to speak to my audience: I am as comfortable and respectful speaking to five year olds as I am speaking to adults, and no five year old has ever called me out for too much jargon or for being too verbose! (Though far more laugh at my jokes). College undergrads and high school students had been my daily audience for a total of 13 years, and more often than not we laughed and learned very robustly together. But I will remember to be careful to bear in mind the advice, and probably be reminded from time to time, while hearing myself speak, to abbreviate and simplify whatever it is I am in the process of saying. Thanks again.

We're all in this story together: Let's make sure that we write it well.
http://www.steveharveyforcolor...


[ Parent ]
You'll be fine - you're a smart guy
Sometimes smart guys are their own worst enemies, though.

Are you going to be posting diaries about your positions on issues?  Can't wait to see your website.


[ Parent ]
Will I publish diaries on issues:
Yes, to the consternation of all political insiders and "handlers" involved in my campaign. I do intend to run a smart campaign, but also an honest and straight-forward one: I believe, as John Maynard Keynes originally said (and as Winston Churchill plagarized), "[People] will do the rational thing, but only after exploring all other alternatives." I truly believe that I am "the rational thing," and that South Jeffco (along with CD 6, of which it is a part) has pretty well exhausted the alternatives.

We're all in this story together: Let's make sure that we write it well.
http://www.steveharveyforcolor...


[ Parent ]
If I may offer a bit of friendly advice,
I have worked on several campaigns in Colorado in the last few election cycles (1 in '06, 2 in '08) and I have noticed a trend among state house candidates that I hope you'll avoid. It seems that many such candidates fall under the illusion that, because they are not running for a federal seat or because the state contribution limits are so much lower or any other such reason that raising money is not as important compared with knocking doors or walking parades or such-like.

Wrong, wrong, wrong. Every candidate I've seen that felt/acted that way lost (and since I was working federal elections that encompassed several house districts generally, I saw quite a few of them). Yes, knocking on doors is important in a more localized race, but cash is still king. Particularly in a tough race like you are sure to find in HD-28 which, as previously mentioned, has been Republican held for a looonnng time. If you are going to win, you are going to need the Democratic leadership and political/money machine behind you, and the only way they will start swinging resources your way is if you can prove you're viable, and the best way to prove viability? Money. Lots of it.

So yes, please knock many doors, and when you start doing so send out an email or post something and I'll come knock some with you. But, don't get lost in the "sentimentality" of campaigning and drill that call time and fund-raising into the ground. Meet and greets, street-corner waving, and handing out buttons at the mall are all a total waste compared with good fund-raising time.

I'm guessing you knew most of that already, but I hope I got the importance of it across. My reasoning is based on experience and anecdotes, not statistical models I'll grant you, but I think it's solid and I hope it'll help.

Best of luck.

"You won't have Andy Romanoff to kick around anymore!" -- sxp151


[ Parent ]
Oh God, yes. Great advice.
I just want to second everything Raphael said. I worked a state house campaign in 2004 and a US House race in 2006 and a 3 candidate local school board race in 2007. Money talks. We all know what walks. Street corner waving and yard signs are great fun--but yard signs don't vote and street waving takes time away for phonebanking for votes and dollars.

Big thumbs up to you for this comment, Raphael.


--From a "real dick."
by: JO


[ Parent ]
Thanks Middle
It just sucks to see good candidates succumb to the sentimentalities of campaigning.

"You won't have Andy Romanoff to kick around anymore!" -- sxp151

[ Parent ]
You're more than welcome.
It was great advice, well said and also obvious that you were offering it, not as criticism, but because you care and have experience.  

--From a "real dick."
by: JO


[ Parent ]
Thanks.
I appreciate the advice. Be reassured, that I have professionals sitting on my shoulder whispering in my ear. We are not running an amateur operation, though, to be fair, they are saddled with a willful candidate!

I recognize the importance of raising money, and we are giving it its due emphasis. Personally, while some funds are needed to pay for campaign literature, mailings, events, and the like, I strongly believe that, at this level especially, "people raising" is far more important. Obama certainly didn't pale to anyone in fund raising, but the real genius of his campaign was its success in people raising. At the House District level, people raising in 90% of the challenge: Get a thousand strong supporters to convince as three quarters many again to be equally strong, who in turn convince half again as many..., and you have a landslide victory all wrapped up.

That's not the conventional wisdom, and it's not what some experienced people believe (though it is what other experienced people, and many economists, believe), but, in any case, I'm looking at the whole challenge, and the integrated strategy necessary to meeting it. Nothing will be neglected.

We're all in this story together: Let's make sure that we write it well.
http://www.steveharveyforcolor...


[ Parent ]
Glad to hear it
and I hope I'm not being a "backseat adviser" so to speak. Like I said to Middle, it would just be very unfortunate to see you not succeed simply because you didn't raise enough money.

Because I would actually contend your point about the genius of Obama's campaign. I think it is much more plausible to believe that Obama was so successful at "people raising" because, a) he had a lot of money which enabled him to spread his message/counter the lies, & b) everyone hated Bush (which is obviously an exaggeration, but all Obama had to do to rile people up was not be Bush). The question is, how do you raise those people, and the answer is, with a lot of cash. Unfortunately Steve, as much as I admire what you write here -- verbosity and all -- you will not be filling a stadium with strong supporters like Obama. I'm sorry that's just how it is. What you can do though is raise enough money to send out leaflets, buy radio spots, hire canvassers, and everything else you need to spread your message most effectively.

I truly don't doubt that you will have a resounding and appealing message that resonates with voters. But the point of money raising is to shove that message in their face. Campaigning is a dynamic process, and you must assume (especially on the state house level) that people are paying zero attention to you (which sadly is true for the majority), and as such will only be a strong supporter if you actively go out there to grab them. That is why door-knocking is a powerful tool, but having a lot of money will allow you to knock on many more doors in many more ways. Obama, for all his talent and astuteness, would never have made it to New Hampshire,much less the White House, if he didn't have the money to make it happen.

And please post a link to your website when you get one so I can sign up for email updates and volunteer opportunities.

"You won't have Andy Romanoff to kick around anymore!" -- sxp151


[ Parent ]
Thanks, Raphael!


We're all in this story together: Let's make sure that we write it well.
http://www.steveharveyforcolor...


[ Parent ]
Good luck
Knock on a lot of doors and stand on a lot of street corners

It's a great journey - don't forget to keep a good sense of humor and have fun!

TABOR4LIFE


Thanks, MAH.


We're all in this story together: Let's make sure that we write it well.
http://www.steveharveyforcolor...


[ Parent ]
You crazy bastard...
(just kidding).  Very best of luck to you Steve.

"Good judgement comes from experience.  Experience comes from bad judgement" - Jim Horning

[ Parent ]
well, now I've heard/read everything!
YOU, a legislator?  HA!

I joke.  Best of luck swimming the shark-infested waters.  I could never do it, for a long list of reasons, one of which is that I get defensive when a swarm of experts in law and politics (who are in fact experts in neither) pounce on me with picayune points!  You will have to respond with diplomacy and courtesy.  If I attemped such a positive reaction, it would kill me dead.


DraftJambalaya2010.com


[ Parent ]
feeling Jambacidal are you?
you want me dead just so you can forge and collect my SSI checks, right?

[ Parent ]
No no no
but I strongly feel that if you join Diggs Brown on his secret mission in Somalia, you'll have a better chance at getting elected.

[ Parent ]
Thanks, Jambalaya!
Good advice, of course. And we're much alike in our impatience with the little swarm of Jonathan Swift characters who got cut from "Gulliver" for not being interesting enough. But, in the future, I'll be sure to try to crack the egg wherever the Lilliputians insist it must be cracked....

You may not want to run, but please consider working on the campaign! My email address is..., oh, yeah, we've already gone over that.  :)

We're all in this story together: Let's make sure that we write it well.
http://www.steveharveyforcolor...


[ Parent ]
Congrats & sympathy
First off, congrats on doing this. I think anyone willing to step up and put themselves on the line for this deserves a big thank you.

Second, you have my sympathy as campaigning is a nasty nasty business. You are going to get hammered and in a lot of cases for something that is untrue. So start building us a thick skin.

Third, thank you for doing this. You will be a great rep and we need people like you in office.

Where you gonna go for business reporting software?


A bit of advice
Now that you're running, I figure it's ok to bring up a subject that you asked us to not speak to.

1. Talk less. Forget all your arguments about why detailed answers are ok because in an election the long-winded answer loses. Politicians speak in sound bites not because they all want to, but because that is what wins.

2. Don't argue that something is ok when it's a loser (ie your email address). That's like Gore's "no controlling authority" response - he may have been right but he would have been better served by just apologizing. Think of it like being married - many times you need to apologize when you're right.

3. Get your infrastructure set up ASAP. Contributions through the website, email lists, forums, start your own blog, tweet.

good luck - dave

Where you gonna go for business reporting software?


[ Parent ]
Forget it, David
He doesn't want to hear that shit, no matter how right "that shit" is (and what you're telling him is right).

I have worked for dozens of candidates over the last twenty years.  I have seen good ones and bad ones, had winners and losers.

The good ones, the winners, listened to their staffs, no matter how much they didn't like the advice.  One common theme among the losers was "kill the messenger."  

None of us here at Pols have been paid, therefore our advice is worthless. (If you give away that which you sell, people perceive it to have no value.)

Steve bloody well better listen to his paid staff if he wants to win, even if his staff tells him stuff he doesn't want to hear.

And he bloody well better surround himself with people who will tell him stuff he doesn't want to hear.

Management 101.  You're familiar with the concept, I'm sure.

His reaction to good, friendly advice in this forum doesn't bode well for the paid people who, if they're worth what he's paying them, will tell him the same stuff.

Steve: two last pieces of free advice for you.  1) Learn to say "good morning" in two words, because voters don't have time for anything more.  And 2) quit telling people how smart you are, because nobody is smarter than the voters.  Just ask them.

See you on election night, Steve.


When I use lots of words, they always form an analysis (and, while producing high volume, also produce high information-density).
--Steve Harvey, 2009


[ Parent ]
Thanks, Ralphie.
There have possibly been some (though extremely few) winning candidates in history who haven't had said of them things similar in tone and content to what you are so eager, in your long-familiar "friendliness," to say about me, but none that were much respected once elected, nor long remembered once out of office.

I appreciate the endorsement.

We're all in this story together: Let's make sure that we write it well.
http://www.steveharveyforcolor...


[ Parent ]
Good luck with the campaign Steve
I believe the only political issue that you and I disagree on is the 2nd amendment issue (I am a bit more pro-2nd amendment than you). But, one will never find a candidate that agrees with you 100% of the time.

I have a democratic friend in the state house that is not pro-LGBT issues and is pro-death penalty (I am pro-LGBT and against the death penalty). Despite these differences I support him because he is pro-labor. He is also honest and sincere. And, it is imperative that we keep the majority in both houses.

I have experience with two successful local city council races, was a campaign manager on a successful state rep campaign and collected nearly 500 valid petition sigs on a congressional race (oooops I just gave away my identity).

Despite HD28 leaning R, you have a solid opportunity to win. Remember, the smartest or best candidate does not necessarily win. The winner will most likely raise the most money, have the most direct mail pieces targeted to different audiences and knock on the most doors. And, I know some people say yard signs don't vote, which is true. But, yard signs show that a candidate has a ground game and it shows that you have support. People like winners. Lots of yard signs = you are liked and a winner. As you know, generally D's will vote D and R's will vote R. That means you will have to win the Unaffiliated vote and get the D's excited(GOTV)in order to win HD28.


Thanks, Thorntondem.
Your last sentence is the key, I think: I'm working on the second part now (getting Dems excited). I appreciate your support despite our robust debate!

We're all in this story together: Let's make sure that we write it well.
http://www.steveharveyforcolor...


[ Parent ]
the JeffCoPols site has you
on the big line as an R.  

[ Parent ]
So does Mile High Politics
Maybe the insiders know something ...

[ Parent ]
I contacted them about it yesterday. Thanks.


We're all in this story together: Let's make sure that we write it well.
http://www.steveharveyforcolor...


[ Parent ]
My campaign email account is
steve.harvey.hd28@gmail.com

I will post my campaign website address, both here and on the daily open thread, when it is up and running (which should be in a couple of weeks).

Thanks for all of your comments, good wishes, and statements of support.

We're all in this story together: Let's make sure that we write it well.
http://www.steveharveyforcolor...


Beautiful email address!
Seriously.

Although I did not chime in on the email thread, I just wanted to relay that I had a sinking feeling in my stomach when you offered your CU account. It's a small issue, but detractors/opponents can make great hay out of the inconsequential.

But, you did register with the SoS long before you made this announcement on ColoPols, so you are avoiding a mistake some much more seasoned pols have already made this season.

None the less, even with this new address, I still won't vote for you (no malice intended - I just don't live in HD28). I look forward to being able to support your run.

All the best to you and yours.

Sum Ergo Cogito.


[ Parent ]
Thanks Ardy.
It's never too late to move!

We're all in this story together: Let's make sure that we write it well.
http://www.steveharveyforcolor...


[ Parent ]
Hey Yevrahnevets
I'm a fan. I love your systems and community thinking. Here's the Real Work:

http://blogs.salon.com/0002007/

and,

http://www.theoildrum.com/

It's a lot of work, with no guaranteed reward.

Good luck!

"In short, we eat oil" ardy39


Thanks for the links, Robin.
They're right on target.

We're all in this story together: Let's make sure that we write it well.
http://www.steveharveyforcolor...


[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?




Advertise Here!
ads@coloradopols.com


Active Users
Currently 13 user(s) logged on.

Search




Advanced Search


Colorado Pols Network




















Stay home if you have flu symptoms. Visit www.cdc.gov/h1n1 for more information.


RSS 2.0



Pols Gets Mobile: ColoradoPols.com/mobile/

Colorado Pols is on Twitter: twitter.com/coloradopols

Email Pols


How to Write a Diary That Will Make the Front Page



Relevant Links

Back Roads to the White House

The Big Media Blog

Blog It Right

Blog For Growth

Blogometer

Colorado Capitol Journal

Colorado Center on Law and Policy

Colorado Democratic Party

Colorado Ethics Watch

Colorado Independent

Colorado Veterans for America

Colorado Legislature

Colorado Lib

Colorado Libertarian Blog

Colorado Media Matters

Colorado Progressive Coalition

Colorado Republican Party

Colorado Secretary of State

Colorado Senate

Colorado Young Democrats

Commentary Today

Coyote Gulch

CU Democrats

Curious Stranger

Daily Kos

Dan Willis-Rumors

Dem Notes

Democracy for Colorado

Denver Politics

Denver Post

East Boulder County Politics

Ed Stein Ink

Election Neutrality Now

George in Denver

Great Education Colorado

Head First Colorado

The Hotline Political Network

Left in the West

Liberal and Loving It

Maintain Educational Standards in Colorado

Mount Virtus

MyDD

National Journal

On Call

Peak Dems

Political Gravy

Politics West

Political State Report

Progress Now

Prometheus

Project Vote Smart

Radio Free Denver

Rocky Mountain News

Senate Guru

Slapstick Politics

State 38

Steam Powered Opinions

Square State

Stygius

TalkLeft

The Thicket

The Bell Policy Center

The Hypothetical Wren

ThomasMC.com

Toilet Paper Online

Ultimate Politics

View From a Height

Walter in Denver

Wash Park Prophet

Washington and the West

Western Democrat



Colorado Pols is wholly owned by www.ColoradoPols.com, LLC
webmaster-at-coloradopols.com
Powered by: SoapBlox