U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

Governor See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
August 30, 2009 02:03 AM UTC

a "conservadem" gets a primary.Updated w/ analysis by Nate Silver:

  • 13 Comments
  • by: wade norris

(crossposted at Daily Kos)

Among the Senate Vacancy appointments this year, Colorado’s Michael Bennet by Dem Governor Ritter surprised many.

Bennet was not in the top ten or twenty for possible selections for the vacancy, puzzling democratic activists.

As a Senator, Bennet quickly upset democrats by joining a centrist group of Senators headed by Evan Bayh, which was quickly labeled the “Conservadems” by Rachel Maddow. My main concern on this group was their vocal support for blocking Climate Change legislation.

But, I did not become vocal about this curious Senate appointment until I heard the number of complaints from rural democratic party members across the state. Their voices were united in wishing the Governor had appointed outgoing Democratic House Speaker Andrew Romanoff.

Now, it seems he has heard enough from Democratic supporters to jump into the Senate race as the Denver Post Reports.

Update – Nate Silver

http://www.fivethirtyeight.com…

Overall, this seems like a win-win for Democrats. If Bennet holds on, and that is more likely than not, he’ll have gained some experience as a campaigner and may become a stronger general election candidate. If Bennet proves to be too wet behind the ears, the Democrats will have a capable candidate in Romanoff to replace him. And in the meantime, even if the challenge is not explicitly on ideological grounds, Bennet will be under increased pressure to toe the party line, potentially giving the Democrats one less headache on issues like health care and the climate bill.

Read on below

This highlights my main argument as I stated here to RSB:

It is my humble hope that this primary will force Bennet and  Romanoff to say where they stand on the issues that are important to Democrats – especially the Progressive democrats.

My own gripe is that the Conservadem movement will be part of the hold up of any meaningful Climate Change legislation – and the legislation they would stand in the way of, does not go nearly far enough to stop some of the catastrophes our planet faces.

Will Romanoff step up? don’t know – will it make Bennet define himself for the party – yes.

Voters will benefit in this case.

Former House Speaker Andrew Romanoff is poised to mount a Democratic primary campaign against Sen. Michael Bennet.

Urged to challenge Gov. Bill Ritter as he seeks re-election in 2010, Romanoff has instead turned his attention to the U.S. Senate race, sources told the Denver Post. One source reported that Romanoff offered a campaign position to a veteran Democratic strategist.

Romanoff could not be reached for comment on Friday night.

People close to Romanoff, 44, said the former House Speaker will make an announcement next month.

A source said Romanoff would need to keep the support of people who had pledged to back him if he challenged Ritter. Labor officials, in particular, have expressed displeasure with Ritter over several controversial vetoes and were eager to funnel money toward a primary challenge.

Governor Ritter has been very troubling to Democrats. First he replaced our Latino Senator Ken Salazar with an unknown white male when perhaps a latino could have been selected.

(Ritter did not select the DPS vacancy)

Next, Ritter vetoed 2 labor bills in a row, which has earned him more disapproval among the base.

It also did not help Senator Bennet to have no response on his support for Employee Free Choice Act in this video with Darcy Burner and David Canter – candidate for CO-6 – which created this fairly negative ad by fellow democrats.

Maddow on the Conservadems:

I hope this primary challenge by Andrew Romanoff will give voters a chance to vote for a more progressive democrat.

Join Andrew’s volunteer’s facebook page here  or his volunteers webpage here

Disclaimer: I am just a simple blogger,no affiliation with Andrew Romanoff in any capacity.

Tweet
Share

Comments

13 thoughts on “a “conservadem” gets a primary.Updated w/ analysis by Nate Silver:”

  3. Now with Romanoff in the race, you get to choose between two Conservadems.

    Whether or not, as a Senator, Romanoff would join their little working group or whatever, his votes would probably mirror Bennet’s. He’s just as much of a budget hawk as Bennet, and that’s about the only area I can see where progressives have a huge problem with him.

    Putting all of their support behind him, as a way of passive aggresively showing displeasure with Ritter, makes absolutely no sense. If you don’t like Ritter, then primary him.

    I like Romanoff as much as the next Denver-metro Democrat, but the logic behind all of this is truly flawed.

      1. He posted this POS on Kos, too and still hasn’t bothered to post a correction to his claim that Ritter appointed the Denver Superintendent.

      1. that somehow a primary challenge to Bennet will make things better? If Ritter is the one that is “going to lose to the R challenger”? What kind of messed up logic is this? I can’t even begin to comprehend.

      2. So Penry could beat Ritter, but Romanoff can’t? That doesn’t make a whole lot of sense to me Wade.

        I agree it will be interesting–I don’t know if I’d use the word fun per se–but if it doesn’t have the effect that DavidThi808 and others say it will have, and has the effect I think it will have, then it will be a great story at the cost of a Dem senate seat.

  4. Let’s not begin this race with misconceptions on this credible blog: Romanoff is not a progressive, but is a moderate who has satisfied even the most conservative Republicans in this state. We in Northern Colorado are not interested in the progressive movement, but are willing to listen to Romanoff when he speaks.

    Ritter had a chance to recognize the talent and leadership of Romanoff in making his Secretary of State pick. Ritter chose Buescher, the fmr State Senator who LOST his reelection bid vs selecting the well-liked fmr Speaker who was term-limited. Ritter could have satisfied the broad base of state Dems from the beginning.

    I wish Romanoff would run against DeGette. I’m glad that I moved from Denver back home to the North, because DeGetter never represented me. DeGette has been in Congress for too long and has not had any serious challenger. She’s too comfortable and thus does not really have to do anything. (CD1 isn’t even listed on the sidebar!) Reps. Perlmutter and Markey have been in Congress for shorter periods and have demonstrated leadership FOR COLORADO, because they know that the voters in their Districts will hold them accountable. In Colorado, we don’t like to have Senators and Representatives who stay on forever and who can take their ELECTED positions for granted. We keep them on their toes – Denver is wasting this opportunity by protecting DeGette. Romanoff is a very strong legislator and would provide a more balanced representation of CD1.

    Why do we need to wait for DeGette to decide when she is done? Isn’t that the people’s role?

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

221 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!