Denver7’s Robert Garrison reports on a bill in the Colorado legislature in response to a recent case of sexual abuse by a teacher in a Colorado middle school–a bill taking fire from an organization with a decidedly troubled past on the issue of child sexual abuse, the Catholic Church:
Legislation that would reform a mandatory system of reporting child abuse in Colorado is not getting support from the Catholic Church.
Senate Bill 18-058 would extend the statute of limitations in cases where a person is required by law to report child abuse but fails to do so.
Currently, the statute of limitations for failing to report child abuse or neglect in Colorado is 18 months, which could result in dropped charges in the recent indictment against three Cherry Creek school leaders accused of hiding allegations made by a specific student in 2013…
However, the lobbying arm for the three Catholic Dioceses in Colorado argues the bill goes too far…[their] statement stops short of detailing how the bill would impact the church, which has been rocked by a decades-long child sex assault scandal. And in some cases, clergy members have been accused of not reporting suspected child abuse.
One the one hand, the Catholic Church has been wrestling with the problem of sexual predators in the ranks of the priesthood for many decades, and can be taken at its word today far more than in previous years that they’re committed to putting a stop to it.
On the other hand, the church has actively covered up the abuse of children by not all, but some clergy for much of that time–going back perhaps literal centuries. The Catholic Church opposing legislation to extend mandatory reporting limitations in abuse cases could therefore be cast in a profoundly negative light.
With this in mind, we would have suggested more subtle lobbying by the church! But it’s a bit late for that now.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: NOV GOP meltdown
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: davebarnes
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: MartinMark
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: davebarnes
IN: Get More Smarter on Thursday (Sept. 5)
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Initiatives 50 and 108 are Officially Dead as Democrats Emerge Victorious
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Initiatives 50 and 108 are Officially Dead as Democrats Emerge Victorious
BY: ParkHill
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Boebert Challenged Vigorously In First Debate, Vows No More
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Thursday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Confess as we say (. . . not as we do)?
Whatdaya’ wanna’ bet that if this happens to pass, that the church will pursue a “religious exemption” because reporting child abuse would violate their deeply-held faith???? . . .
The church still actively covers up and denies the abuse of children. This isn't an optics problem; they genuinely believe that these folks shouldn't be tried by the civil justice system.
After Defending Controversial Bishop, Pope To Send Sex Abuse Investigator To Chile
The church has utterly failed to meaningfully adjust its understanding in a way that values children over their rapists. I think this is Francis' greatest failing, and a fundamental one, as his predominant message is to love the poor, yet it is those children who are disproportionately subject to rape and other abuses at the hands of Catholic officials.
It's bad optics but necessary financial planning….
Since most insurance policies these days exclude coverage for kiddie diddling, the church faces yuge liability issues with the pedophile priests.
Same old bullshit from the old men in skirts.
No surprise. Church before God. Church before God's word. All hail the power and the glory that is our multibillion $ scam!
Well, churches at least indisputably exist. The same can't be said for God.
Does the reporting law even cover churches? And if so, under what circumstances? If not, then this is truly horrendously bad optics…
Maybe they'll resort to the Hobby Lobby deeply held religious beliefs defense.