Jesse Paul at the Denver Post (say a prayer for them) reports on the ongoing crisis over sexual harassment allegations in the GOP-controlled Colorado Senate, and the increasing difficulty of conducting essential business in an environment where three Republican Senators have had credible allegations made against them–yet every day, dozens of women who are vocationally obliged to go to the State Capitol must deal with:
The sexual harassment complaint against GOP state Sen. Randy Baumgardner has spilled into a contentious statehouse debate about legislation to fix Colorado’s roads, with Democrats pushing back on the measure over policy disagreements and the lawmaker’s role as one of the bill’s main sponsors.
The result has been two days of politically charged floor discussion on Senate Bill 1 with no signs of compromise. While Republicans have the votes to pass the measure and send it to the House, without any Democratic support, its future in the lower chamber looks dim.
“How do I work with a colleague from across the aisle who has this cloud hanging over him?” Sen. Rachel Zenzinger,D-Arvada, said in an interview. She is one of two Democrats on the Senate Transportation Committee, which first heard the bill, and has raised concerns about how the GOP would pay for and sustain it.
Meanwhile, Senate Republicans have consistently refused to acknowledge the real issue behind the increasing Democratic resistance to business as usual, instead focusing on the parliamentary tactic and the legislation supplying the battleground for the more pressing concern:
If you’re sitting in traffic this morning, or will be sitting in traffic later today, you’ll have plenty of time to consider this: @COSenDem would rather filibuster, obfuscate and tap dance than debate the merits of a road fix. #copolitics #coleg #sb1 pic.twitter.com/U6EqXYzsj2
— Colorado Senate GOP (@ColoSenGOP) March 14, 2018
The problem is not the details of Senate Bill 18-001, which would refer a measure to voters to take out a large bond obligation for road projects–although you may well find the GOP’s plan for billions in new debt “without raising taxes” is the not the responsible way to solve Colorado’s transportation problems as we suspect the Democratic House will.
The problem is that Sen. Randy Baumgardner is the sponsor of the bill.
With each passing day since the House voted overwhelmingly to expel Rep. Steve Lebsock after multiple allegations of sexual harassment against Lebsock were found credible, the Senate’s failure to take meaningful action over similarly credible complaints against multiple Republican Senators is reinforcing the hostile environment the women who work for and vocationally interact with the Colorado Senate have experienced for years. That is why every day recently in the Senate has begun with some manner of protest against these men, especially Sen. Baumgardner, continuing to serve. It’s a situation that would not be tolerated in any private workplace, and Senate President Kevin Grantham’s declaration that sexual harassment by Senators not rising to the level of a crime will go unpunished results in an environment no woman should ever be forced to work in.
And yet women who work at the Colorado Capitol are. Every. Single. Day.
Something’s got to give, folks.
We are not prescribing a specific remedy. We only say this morally cannot be allowed to continue.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Friday Jams Fest
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Dems Save The Day, Government To Stay Open
BY: Gilpin Guy
IN: Weld County Gerrymandering Case Pushes The Boundaries Of Home Rule
BY: SSG_Dan
IN: Friday Jams Fest
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Friday Jams Fest
BY: bullshit!
IN: Friday Jams Fest
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Friday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Seems to me there must be something more than Democratic resistance to the measure. Republicans have a very narrow majority, so they could pass the bill and push it to the House — if they had every member of their caucus on board with the policy.
How much of this is Democrats manipulating the rules to extend debate?
How much is the demand from the Republican majority of "Our way or [no] highway"?
How much is Republican awareness that they cannot entice any Democrats to break ranks and they have a credible threat of dissent within their own caucus?
"How Long Can Senate Business Go On Like This?"
Until May 9th.
Sine die!
Well – 142 years and counting.
It just starts over in a few months.
Meanwhile Hancock and the socialist city council of Denver gets off Scott free
If it’s Friday, Fluffy must be concerned about sexual harassment . . .
. . . until he’s not, again.
. . . until he’s defending it, again.
. . . until, again.
Due process.
Speaking of Scott free…shouldn't you be directing your Mensa-like prowess towards your Groper-in-Chief's legal strategery?
Six women have come forward to Stormy Daniels’ lawyer with similar stories
Anybody surprised by these developments? I'm sure not.
“Surprised”? I spose’ not . . .
. . . but I am fairly disappointed to learn that there might be six more American women that stupid. Are they Slovenian? Norwegian?
Similar to the adult-film actress' story….
Michael Cohen's house must be mortgaged to the hilt. I imagine he will have to declare that he alone paid the hush money to these other women.
There are only nine shopping days left until the 60 Minutes interview airs.
What would you say if Hancock wasn't getting off Scott Free? That it was a witch hunt like you said with the House Republican from Thornton that was expelled?
BTW, did you read this article? http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/03/14/teacher-accidentally-fires-gun-in-class-students-injured.html
Also, are you here to talk about the special election in PA-18 that happened on Tuesday?
Moldy prefers that the sexual predators stay where they most belong – in the Republican Party.
It's a big tent after all.
Yes, indeed.
A sad commentary on my city council critters.
I wouldn't expect our resident dullard to know this, but the term is Scot-free, not Scott. And it doesn't refer to Scotland. It's an old term for tax-free.
Maybe he was referring to Ray Scott . . .
. . . Scott free . . .
. . . as in, unemcumbered by thought?
Maybe confusing an African-American mayor with an old, white perv?