U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) George Stern
(D) A. Gonzalez
(R) Sheri Davis
40%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
November 11, 2009 01:05 AM UTC
11 Comments
when the other side has to ante up for the attorney fees!
Way to go.
Did the judge rule that the board’s new rule violated our constitution or that the board’s public notice was fatally flawed? Or both?
I think that if the judge’s main concern was over public meeting fairness issues, then the board shall soon have a public meeting and re-issue the same rule.
You are probably correct about the net effect, but then the actual issue will be litigated.
This is the problem when you have conflicting regulations, statutes (federal & state) and constitutional provisions.
…are you suggesting that this whole litigation matter will change nothing? That the same rule, or change to the rule, will likely be in effect in another month? So, the net effect of this lawsuit is nothing more than the state paying some lawyer fees and nothing more? Where are my rosary beads???
But, then again, the state board of health will have to actually listen to testimony this next time about why the facts of the recent court case don’t warrant a change in the rules (as the judge indicated in the article above). And they’ll have to listen to testimony again from several hundred patients. And the board will have to explain itself credibly in the glare of the media.
As it’s often said, it takes a big person to admit that he or she was wrong. We’ll find out what size and dimensions the members of the board of health are, after this next hearing.
Keep you red eyes on the ball:-)
This battle is far from over.
The wr on drugs is lost. Peole are doing hrd time for over an ounce while medical marijuana is sld by the bushel.
The only legacy that prohibition gave the USA is organized crime, and stock car racing.
The sheer incompetence of the Board of Health forces the question: What were they smoking?
Good news. One more step in the goal towards getting the gummint outta of our way!