U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(D) George Stern

(R) Sheri Davis

50%↑

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
March 06, 2010 12:59 PM UTC

Bennet: Reforming Washington (new title)

  • 10 Comments
  • by: peacemonger

I rememember the first time I cried after watching a political speech on C-Span. My favorite time of year is May, when C-Span is filled with college commencement speeches made by politicians and pundits. I arm myself with a box of kleenex and a Webster’s dictionary, and settle in for a couple of weeks, at least.

Time is marked by elections and speeches rather than years, for people like us. I felt nostalgic yesterday when I saw that completely-grey-haired Congressman Sander Levin replaced Charles Rangel on the House Ways and Means committee. “Why, I remember the first time he ran for office when I was just a kid…”

On Wednesday, my favorite new Member of Congress made an important speech on the Senate floor. So impressed, I transcribed the whole thing from the You-tube video so I could share it with all of you. Even the most die-hard Romanoffskis might be picking up their pom-poms and cheering, “Go Michael, go Michael”. You can’t NOT love this one. And yes, O’Toole and Sharon, it’s not too late to caucus for Michael Bennet after you read it.

First, here’s a link to the video: Reforming Washington

Disclaimer: I take full responsibility for any errors or ommissions in transcribing the video to text. Paragraph breaks are my own.  

Speech on the Senate Floor – “Reforming Washington”

US Senator Michael Bennet

Wednesday, March 03, 2010

I’d like to take a couple of minutes this morning to talk about something that not only effects the current legislation on the floor, but everything we are currently working on in the Senate.

Before coming to the Senate a little over a year ago, I spent my life in the real world — the world of business, of local government, of public schools, and most important of all, a family.  But since coming to Washington, I’ve discovered that many people learn to live in an entirely different world — an echo chamber shut off from the reality of life in America that defies common sense at every turn and uses anonymous holds to defy the rule of reason. I used to tell my little girls that Alice in Wonderland was just a fairy tale, but now I am not so sure.

If you come from the real world, when you get to Washington — to Wonderland — the logic can seem upside down or inside out or just plain wrong. Here, it turns out that folks attack you when you don’t cut backroom deals at the taxpayers’ expense. Here, a lot of people seem to think that saying they’re for doing something, like extending unemployment job benefits or passing a jobs bill, is exactly the same thing as actually rolling up your sleeves and getting it done. They think that blaming failure on their opponents is the same thing as fighting for real change.

Mr. President, Coloradans and Americans are reading their papers and watching their televisions and what they see drives them nuts… and it should. Because all they find are talking heads yelling at each other on cable news and cynical, reckless partisanship paralyzing their government. This phony political conversation won’t do when we need real change, but Washington can’t seem to get out of its’ own way. And that is why I will introduce legislation to end lobbyist abuses, reform the ways of the Senate, stop the outside influence of special interest, and put Washington to work for the people of Colorado.  

First, we need to hold Congress accountable.  We should freeze the pay and office budgets of every member of Congress until we have four quarters of job growth.  Our salaries and office budgets should not go up when the rest of the country is struggling. And members of Congress should lose their tax-payer funded health insurance until we pass health insurance reform. If Congress can’t get its act together on health care then the American people shouldn’t subsidize health care for Congress. That goes for Democrats and Republicans. It turns out that dysfunction in Washington is just another kind of pre-existing condition that allows the insurance companies to get their way.

Second, we need real lobbying reform that restores power to the voters. We need to ban members of Congress from becoming lobbyists when they leave office. We need to do something about the revolving door between Congress and K Street. We need stronger rules and tighter standards for lobbyist registration and real penalties for those who break the rules. And we need to end the corporate subsidy for Members of Congress who fly on corporate jets. Every member of Congress should pay their fair share and disclose every person who is on the plane with them.

Third, real reform will not be complete without earmark reform. The people of Colorado pay taxes and they deserve a government that works for them. I have no issue with Members of Congress fighting for projects they think are valuable for their state or for their district. I’m proud, for example, of the funding we secured for projects like the Arkansas Valley conduit that languished (languished!) in the Senate since President Kennedy first promised it to the people of Colorado. But this funding should be done in the light of day, completely transparent and accountable, not behind closed doors, hidden from the American people.  

Under my legislation, Members of Congress will be required to post every earmark request they receive, and every request they make for funding. And we shouldn’t wait for the law to change. There is no reason to wait for the law to change. We can start doing this now. Second, every earmark should be listed at earmarks.gov. The website should be easily searchable and user-friendly. Third, members of Congress should be held accountable for their requests. Larger earmark requests should go before the appropriations committee, and we should end air-drops of earmarks in conference committee. Finally, earmark recipients should be held accountable. This means randomly auditing earmarks every year, and publishing the results for our constituents to see.

Next, we need to deal with the challenge of passing real campaign finance reform that reduces the outside influence of special interests.  I intend to support the bill that Senator Schumer and Congressman Van Hollen are putting together and urge my colleagues to do the same.  

Finally, we need to reform the institution of the Senate itself. The filibuster has been used in the Senate for quite some time. It has been used by the minority to slow down debate, to have their voices heard, and in some cases, stall legislation. I’d remind members of my own party that just the threat of a filibuster stopped the privatization of Social Security.

However, during this session of Congress, the right to filibuster has been abused; it has become a normal part of business — a way to stall every piece of legislation and simply slow the Senate to a crawl. Three months ago, Mr. President, we spent weeks debating the extension of unemployment benefits. The bill passed 98-0. The Senate has spent days, weeks and sometimes months, holding up nominees that passed with more than 90 votes. And to add insult to injury, one Senator held up the entire Senate preventing us from extending unemployment benefits and COBRA. The country deserves much better than that.

I will introduce legislation that reforms Senate procedure to encourage the two parties to work together to get things done. It will eliminate anonymous holds. If Senators want to single-handedly stop a nominee from being approved, then they should have the courage to do so publicly. It will introduce a new procedure to allow us to reduce the time of debate so we can move on legislation that has broad bipartisan support. Third, it will eliminate the filibuster on the motion to proceed.  It is one thing to try to block a piece of legislation; it is another thing to prevent it from even being debated in the first place. And finally, my legislation would change the rule of the filibuster to force the two parties to actually talk to each other and not past each other.

The President reminded us during the State of the Union that our job is not to get elected, and I’ve heard the same thing from thousands of Coloradans in hundreds of living rooms and town halls. It is easy to throw our hands up in the air and wait for someone else to make the big changes we need.  But we all know the American people deserve better. I know the people of Colorado expect much more. They know that the United States Senate needs a big dose of Colorado common-sense.

I know this is not easy. I know there are a hundred different reasons, maybe a thousand different reasons some will say, “We can’t get this done”.  But I also know our country needs a government that works for them.  I hope my colleagues from both sides of the aisle will work with me and others to make sure we get it done.

Comments

10 thoughts on “Bennet: Reforming Washington (new title)

  1. .

    … where he explained what exactly it was that he did for Phil Anschutz.  

    Mike Bennet IS Cleve Tidwell.  

    .

    At a recent event, after reading all the Tidwell literature, I approached his Campaign Manager and made a $50,000 in-kind donation.  

    I told him that there was a hole in the campaign, and the Candidate was doomed to failure until the hole was plugged.  

    The hole: biography.  

    The Campaign Manager relaxed.  He was expecting a death-blow to the solar plexus, and all I did was show my own ignorance.

    “Go to the website,” he told me.  “It’s all there.”  

    While it is fair to value my contribution at 50 large if the campaign responds by then revamping the campaign to fix that fatal flaw, what if the recipient doesn’t recognize the value ?  

    What if he thinks that all the problems with the campaign he’s running are due to stupid voters, and not due to any shortcoming on his part ?  

    .

    1. Most of those old fossils remember young Michael Bennet running around barefoot when his dad worked in the Senate.

      OK maybe he wasn’t quite that young during that time frame, but still. This was a speech about reforming the Senate, not a speech about turning around failing businesses (which is what he did for Phil Anschutz).

  2. .

    I read through this, and I got the impression that Senator Bennet was vowing to serve President Obama rather than the people of Colorado.  Won’t that hurt his campaign ?  

    And his main job, at least 85% of what he does, is transparently about getting elected.  Same for everyone else in the Senate.  Why would he lie about something so obvious ?

    Does he think we’re stupid ?  

    Oops. can I retract that ?

    .

    1. I’m always told that I don’t have to worry about children, before they understand the meaning of the words, being asked to routinely make an oath of allegiance to a nation rather than to humanity, because the two aren’t mutually exclusive. But I do need to worry about a Democratic U.S. Senator stating his support of the policies of a still popular Democratic president (yes, I said “popular”) because to do so would be a betrayal of the people of Colorado whom he represents? Come again?

  3. I am so impressed.

    Here’s a senator still wet behind the ears actually trying to do something.  He may not be effective because of the seniority system, or he may be successful because he is still “outside” in many ways.

    Did I mention I’m impressed?  

  4. Just laughing because I thought I was on my other blog diary from this week, which really was a lot of work (the one listing legislative accomplishments).  lol

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

61 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!