U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) George Stern
(D) A. Gonzalez
(R) Sheri Davis
40%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
March 15, 2010 06:49 PM UTC
14 Comments
Those percentages only add up to 68%. I assume the remaining 32% are undecided? Hardly a sign of passionate support behind any of the GOP candidates. I thought everyone was converting into Republicans these days? That’s what the news keeps telling me.
You can argue that it is still early and that those voters are not paying attention yet. However, those surveyed are likely primary voters and probably ARE paying attention.
Seriously? You’re looking at a PPP result and expecting it to add up? When it has Romanoff up how much?
C’mon! This is why liberals don’t like it when people rise on their merits. They are expected to learn basic skills… like addition and subtraction.
fuck off kindly, thanks.
is McInnis over Maes 58% to 8%.
That’s impossible.
I recall some online poll where Maes crushed. And I know Peter Boyles and all his callers from the day last week Maes was on were strong supporters and confident Maes was going to do really, really well.
Could it be that people who call BOyles don’t run the world?
He’s kicking ass with a solid 1 percent.
Can you imagine the odds against PPP reaching both of Cleve’s supporters with their survey? It’s astonishing!
Does that mean that Tidwell could potentially have a negative amount of support?
The “not Norton” vote is deeply divided, and it isn’t obvious that “not Norton” GOP caucusers will be able to rally around one candidate.
Even Ken Buck just barely makes it onto the ballot and Norton gets a majority of the caucus support, does Buck even stay in the race?
If a candidate gets less than 10%, they can’t petition on.
Buck’s won the last 4 GOP straw polls. If a Not-Norton candidate doesn’t make the ballot, smart money says they go to the candidate least Norton, which probably means Buck.
Wiens doesn’t poll well, but he’s got money so he looks good. If he misses the ballot, his supporters go to Buck.
I predict a Norton-Buck primary.
Just think you’re counting chickens before they hatch.
I doubt BOTH of Tidwell’s supporters (nice RG!) are likely to become energized by Buck, Wiens or anyone. That’s why they support Cleve.
On the other hand, its gonna be FUN to watch Wiens crash tomorrow and then we can try to track the FEC reports on his “LOAN”.
Buck… Who knows where he stand after tomorrow. THAT is the $50,000 question, isn’t it?
Does he REALLY have enough supporters in enough places to garner chance at making the ballot? IF not, can his supporters humbly approach those of failing candidates to join the “Not-Norton” campaign?
Sadly, I don’t think that is a successful tactic. No one EVER gets excited about being the “Not them” team. Look at Kerry’s 04 Presidential run. A LOT of people didn’t like President Bush but Kerry’s brillant strategy of “No W” completely failed to energize anyone.
Is THAT what we want? A candidate who tries to beat Obama and Bennet with a slogan “I’m Not Norton!”
I don’t think so.
won the Broomfield 9/12 pre-caucus straw poll tonight with 45%. Interestingly, Norton got not a SINGLE vote. I know the limitations of straw polls, but if these voters turn out at caucus, we could see some real surprises.
Not sure I’m just not catching it, but the date on the poll and your “straw poll tonight” claim don’t match up…got a link we can look at for those results?
That’s the first straw poll I’ve seen Maes handle, too. In El Paso, it was 50/50, and that’s the best I’ve seen him do (feel free to correct me, I’m not enamored with either of them, so I haven’t been watching it as closely).
Even with these numbers, though, has Tidwell shown much at any of the other 9/12 events? Not at any that I’ve seen (but not all of them have been well publicized).
SL, I’m not sure it’ll end up being a “Not” style race, especially when the field narrows. If Buck can be positive (and get some ads out), he should be able to turn the “Not-Norton” into Pro-Buck. I agree, though, a “not” campaign is usually a weak campaign because you don’t have a strong candidate (look at McCain in 08…there was a lot of “not-Obama”, but not much pro McCain…there might’ve been more pro-Paul than pro-McCain…)
My apologies, I should have looked closer. That was the poll Maes linked to in a tweet last night: