U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(D) George Stern

(R) Sheri Davis

50%↑

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
April 01, 2010 09:09 PM UTC

8,000 Coloradans Spank Suthers

  • 26 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

UPDATE: Colorado House Democrats fired off a stinging letter to John Suthers today, here’s an excerpt from Speaker Terrance Carroll (click here to download the letter in .PDF format):

It is ironic that you, a Republican, now oppose the indivudal mandate given this provision was originally a Republican idea. Republicans introduced the individual mandate in President George H.W. Bush’s Health Equity and Access Reform Today Act of 1993. The leading GOP alternative plan during President Clinton’s health reofrm effort, the 1994 Consumer Choice Health Security Act, also included an individual mandate.

As the Attorney General for the state of Colorado, you are tasked with representing the best interest of Colorado, not special interests that are trying to undermine much needed health care reform.

Westword’s Michael Roberts reports:

Last week, Colorado Attorney General John Suthers joined a dozen peers around the country to sue the federal government in an effort to stop the new health-care law. “I understand that many citizens of Colorado will allege that this lawsuit is politically motivated. It is not. I am not reacting to any group or constituency,” Suthers said at the time.

ProgressNow Colorado executive director Bobby Clark doesn’t buy that — and neither do the at least 8,448 people who’ve signed a petition protesting the move that will be delivered to Suthers’ office at 10:30 a.m. today.

“This is the strongest, fastest response to a petition in the history of our organization,” Clark says. “Clearly, people are really upset about this.”

The volume of petition participation caught Clark by surprise. After all, he says, “we got a late start. He announced his decision a week ago Monday, and we weren’t able to launch until last Saturday — which is typically not a good time to launch, since people don’t pay as much attention to their e-mails on the weekend. But we got a fantastic response right away.”

The reason, in Clark’s view?

“There’s not a single credible nonpartisan legal scholar in the country that I’m aware of that thinks this lawsuit has merit,” he maintains. “And the fact that all these AGs announced this decision so quickly after health care passed absolutely looks like a partisan effort to stop it by the next means available, which is a challenge in the courts. But it’s a waste of taxpayer dollars.”

Seems like that’s a pretty good number for an online petition, though we don’t claim to be experts–to put it in perspective, radio host David Sirota delivered a health care-related petition to Sen. Michael Bennet’s office recently, but it was circulated nationally by a leading progressive activist group. Proportionately, actual Coloradans probably didn’t amount to 8,000 of its 35,000 total. Full text of Progress Now’s release after the jump.

Put another way, it’s 8,000 potential volunteers primed to get another email, about somebody else.

Over 8,400 Coloradans stand up to oppose Attorney General Suthers’ partisan political attack on healthcare reform

Suther’s foolish attempt to block reform is a waste of precious taxpayer dollars

For Immediate Release: Thursday, April 1, 2010

Contact: Bobby Clark, Executive Director, at 303-905-8375

Denver – Today, ProgressNow Colorado Executive Director Bobby Clark delivered to Colorado Attorney General John Suthers more than 8,400 signatures from 57 counties in Colorado on a petition opposing Suthers’ lawsuit attempting to block healthcare reform. Clark offered the following statement.

“The Denver Post got it right. This lawsuit ‘lacks merit’ and ‘appears to be politically motivated’.”

“Nearly 750,000 Coloradans who do not currently have health insurance will be covered because of the historic healthcare reform passed by Congress and signed by President Obama. This year, young people in Colorado can no longer be denied insurance because of pre-existing conditions, and young people can remain on their parents’ insurance through age 26. This year, over 68,000 small businesses in Colorado can receive a tax credit to help pay for insurance for their employees. This year, seniors who have been caught in Medicare’s donut hole will receive a tax rebate to help pay for their prescription drugs not previously covered under Medicare. And this year, every Coloradan can feel more secure that their insurance will not be dropped when they most need it. Attorney General Suthers’ lawsuit is a foolish and politically-motivated waste of taxpayer dollars.”

“Misusing his office for partisan politics seems to be a pattern with Suthers. Just a few weeks ago, Suthers threw the weight of his office behind the extreme right wing “Clear the Bench” organization by publicly stating his intent to vote against retaining three judges on Colorado’s Supreme Court just because they don’t adopt his extreme right-wing ideology. We’ve also criticized Suthers in the past for using the Attorney General’s office to engage in political battles in other states, including a lawsuit over same-sex marriage in Nebraska.”

“Clearly, Suthers is a politically ambitious person who wants to make a national name for himself as a crusader for the right wing. And, given his politically active past, his announcement just days after healthcare reform passed that he’s going to continue the Republicans’ fight against healthcare for Colorado’s children and families in the courts came as no surprise. But as Colorado’s Attorney General he is accountable to all of the people of Colorado. And he needs to stop wasting our state’s precious taxpayer dollars on his political windmill-tilting.”

ProgressNow Colorado is the state’s largest online advocacy organization, with hundreds of thousands of email members across Colorado.

###

Comments

26 thoughts on “8,000 Coloradans Spank Suthers

      1. That’s less then 0.16% of the population, including illegal aliens and about 0.333% of working, underemployed and full on “ain’t gots no job” Coloradans.

    1. On Wednesday, Sirota, who has made no secret of his distaste for either the Senate or the House version of the health care bill, delivered a stack of petitions to Bennet’s Denver office, claiming more than 35,000 signatures, including roughly 1,800 from Colorado residents.

      http://www.coloradostatesman.c

  1. Really, because 1. I know every petition I sgin means I am going to volutneer and 2.

    2,425,362 voted last year, yes being a presidential election year it was high but this shows 0.329% of Colorado voters were upset enough to sign an online form petition.  

    1. Very few people are paying attention to the AG race right now, 8,000 responding to a message this early isn’t bad, and we’ll be lucky to get 50% of 2008’s total to the polls.

      On second thought, you’re right, let’s just give up and call this election right now for the GOP. The media already has, so why bother trying?

  2. .

    the rest of us should go along with what appears to some of us to be an unconstitutional usurpation of states’ rights ?

    I feel qualified to characterize 8,000 as a small number – I got more votes than that in 2008, just within CD-5.  And I paid nothing.  

    .

        1. The American Constitution Party has 1,234 registered active voters in Colorado as of yesterday! So who says 8,000 is a big number? … oh, wait.

          1. .

            Man.  That’s less than the attendance at your average Tea Party event.  That’s pitiful.

            I had a meeting of El Paso Constitution Party members last week.

            12 people showed up, and 3 of them were from the GOP sent to check us out.  

            .

      1. Democrat slogan:  Yes, we will force you.

        Republican slogan:  Yes, we will force you, just less so.

        Classic Liberal slogan:  WE WILL RESIST!  Send in the dogs and fire hoses…please.  Failing that, just throw eggs,

        http://biggovernment.com/srigh

        Gotta love tolerant Progressives.  

        1. This will be my automatic default response to you, based on your Hitler post, which is the dumbest thing I’ve ever read on this blog (and that’s including everything from Libertad). Nobody thinks you’re a victim, so you might as well stop trying to get pity.

          Dogs and fire hoses? Jesus Christ, how fucked up you are.

          1. Don’t worry, sxp, I’m sure that you Progressives will be much more successful than your mentor and ideological brother was over there in Germany.

            heh

            Btw, I don’t want your pity.  I want you to attack without mercy.  Do the Fuhrer proud.

        1. That law says rates should be cut every year to keep Medicare financially sound. But Congress has blocked those cuts from happening in seven of the last eight years and could still do so this year.

          Looks like the problem dates back to Bush-era legislation. Another Republican mess for Democrats to clean up.

            1. The issue really has nothing to do with the recently passed HCR, so there’s really no call for the snarky “own it” crap. This is an issue that dates back to the W days. If you want to assign blame, at least be accurate.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

67 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!