U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(D) George Stern

(R) Sheri Davis

50%↑

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
May 01, 2019 11:48 AM UTC

Um, Your Talking Points Are Broken

  • 3 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

Republican obstructionism at the State Capitol has been a key story in Colorado politics for much of the 2019 legislative session. This topic has only trended more with lawmakers scrambling to finish up work before Sine Die on Friday.

Republican obstruction — particularly in the State Senate — is putting a number of bipartisan measures important to everyday Coloradans at risk of failure, which is starting to prompt calls for a special legislative session. While there’s no indication as of yet that Republicans will actually work with Democrats to pass important bills before the end of the session (at Midnight on Friday), GOP talking points on their obstruction rationale have now fallen apart completely.

As Bente Birkeland reports for Colorado Public Radio:

“Any bills that die on the calendar are the result of poor calendar management by the Democrats,” Republican Senate spokesman Sage Naumann said. “If bipartisan pieces of legislation are unfortunately postponed to the next session in an effort to stop bills that violate the rights of our constituents and put their livelihoods at risk, then that’s a price we’re willing to pay.” [Pols emphasis]

Naumann is the Communications Director for the Republican State Senate Minority, where he has delighted in promoting GOP maneuvers for forcing bills to be read at length or insisting on pointless amendments — all for the sole purpose of trying to run out the session clock. But Naumann is now mixing up his messaging, as you can see in those two incongruent sentences above.

Republicans can A) Take credit for obstruction as their sacred duty, or B) Accuse Democrats of mismanaging the legislative calendar. But they can’t do both. That would be sort of like getting stranded somewhere after slashing your car tires…and then accusing someone else of forgetting to put gas in the car.

On one hand, it’s not terribly surprising that Senate Republicans are confused about their own obstructionist messaging. Earlier this week, Sen. Ray Scott (R-Grand Junction) was quoted decrying Democratic efforts to speed up debate on legislation just hours after he was caught literally watching a movie at his desk on the Senate floor. It’s hard to take Scott seriously about being mad at the pace of debate when he obviously isn’t paying any attention anyway. Naumann’s messaging disaster puts the rest of the GOP caucus in a similar bind.

(h/t 2Jung2Die)

Comments

3 thoughts on “Um, Your Talking Points Are Broken

  1. If your point is, that it would be slightly less dishonest if these turds and their Naumanns would just pick one lie and stick with that, then, yeah, I agree.

    But, you don’t seem to understand that, now well into the third year of their Lord Cheesewizz, that their point is to lie, and then lie about that lie, and then lie about that lying lie some more.  

    It’s not about telling one really good lie, it’s about telling as many lies as often and as quickly as you can . . . 

    . . . no points are earned for coherence or consistency, only volume.

    Naumann clearly knows what he’s getting paid for.

    1. As the person who pointed the Sage's quote out in the first place, I just want to make sure it's on the record that I understand the methods of modern-day lying liars, and the lies they tell, all too painfully well.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

65 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!