Think about this, what if this Oil spill, as tragic as it is, provides us with the wake up call about how we power our world?
My first thought when the spill happened was, what if we had not gotten rid of the electric car of the 1990’s (from the documentary Who Killed the Electric Car?)
and electric cars had grown in usage for the past decade? Would the drilling platform catastrophe still have happened?
No one can be sure, but what we can be sure of, is that it will keep happening until we change our cars from gas/oil powered to electric powered.
That’s why this petition is so important – the Gulf Oil Spill Electric Car Credit.
This petition asks for legislation to give a substantial credit for purchasing an electric car, and it has key provisions to put a lot of people to work, immediately – in a midterm election year.
But we need to get support for this idea in the US House and Senate.
That’s where you can help…
Here is what the petition says:
To: The US President and US Congress from Americans Concerned about the 2010 Gulf Oil Spill
Gulf Oil Spill Electric Car Credit
With oil prices expected to exceed $100 per barrel and millions of dollars of catastrophic damage occurring to U.S. coasts, wildlife, and coastal economies, all due to the 2010 Gulf Coast Oil Spill, it is time for a new direction for transportation in America.In response to the Gulf Coast Oil Spill, this petition asks the U.S. Congress and Senate to introduce legislation and for the President to sign into law a bill that will do the following:
1) Increase the electric car tax credit for any American made Electric cars to 70% of the purchase price.
2) Provide a tax credit for consumers equal to the cost of labor to convert their gas engine vehicle to an electric engine vehicle.
3) To require that all Federal Agencies must use American made Electric cars for 70% of their vehicle fleets beginning January of 2011 and thereafter.This will create instant demand for U.S. made electric cars, which will put Americans back to work, boost the American economy, reduce the demand for Oil, and will give the American people a choice to drive an affordable vehicle that is clean and does not pose a threat to our coastal economies or our wildlife.
Sincerely,
The Undersigned
It may seem impossible to ask for a 70% credit on a car – but, if credit rebate like that is offered,for a set period of time, in the same way the Cash for Clunkers program worked, it will cause a huge increase in production, and ultimately drive down the costs per vehicle long term.
That means, you the consumer, could buy a $50,000 Tesla for $15,000 or a $40,000 Volt for $12,000.
And with the Chevy Volt, the Government could likely negotiate a lowered cost for the Chevy Volt with GM, since the US now owns a majority share of 60% of GM’s stock.
Also, the mandate for government fleets to consist of 70% Electric cars will ensure a steady customer base for companies like Tesla or General Motors, also reducing costs.
Cash for Clunkers program was very popular. That is because unlike the unpopular multi-Trillion dollar Bank Bailouts which give nothing to average citizens, this program would provide a tangible asset for American consumers. And this bill stipulates the cars be American made – thus employing more Americans.
Heading into the mid-terms, the number one issue at this time is the job market.
Imagine if GM announces they are re-hiring laid off workers or that a closed GM factory is re-opening?
Also, Mechanics all across the country would suddenly have an increase in their work orders from people who want to take advantage of the tax credit to exchange their gas engine for an electric one. Imagine, you could exchange out your 1995 Impala gas engine for a 2010 Chevy Volt engine, and see your driving costs drop for transportation – for even less cost than purchasing a new electric car.
We must act – especially since BP is already acting to make this oil spill become out of sight and out of mind, by dumping thousands of gallons of toxic dispersant chemicals on the Oil Spill, which is more harmful than the oil itself, but seemingly only so that the Oil Spill is not as visible on the surface of the Ocean.
(greenwashing at it’s worst)
Certainly fines and regulations will be useful as a lesson to industry, and stopping new drilling will reduce accidents, but we must get to the cause of our oil use.
To prevent this type of accident we must get to the source problem, and changing our cars is one way to do that – so let’s make electric cars and new engines affordable enough for the middle class and promote their purchase.
Now, I am not just looking for signatures on a petition, I am looking for you to call your members of Congress and the Senate to support this kind of legislation – and for anyone who might know a supportive legislator who would carry this type of bill forward.
Contact Congress Here
and Contact the Senate Here
or simply call the general phone number
(202) 224-3121 and ask your representative to support the Gulf Oil Spill Electric Car Credit.
Add in the comments section which Congress person or Senator would be a good candidate to carry this bill forward.
Sign the petition and get our leaders to support it in Congress.
It’s time to take the oil stains off our hands forever.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Colorado Republicans Cruised Past Parody and Kept Right on Going
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Child Actor Ricky Schroder Crashes Tina Peters Trial
BY: davebarnes
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: davebarnes
IN: Colorado Republicans Cruised Past Parody and Kept Right on Going
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Colorado Republicans Cruised Past Parody and Kept Right on Going
BY: Gilpin Guy
IN: Trump Sets GOP Race Relations Back To Stone Age, Thrilling Lauren Boebert
BY: Candidate Fiorino
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: ParkHill
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Colorado Republicans Cruised Past Parody and Kept Right on Going
BY: ParkHill
IN: Thursday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
But, the Tesla is ridiculous and there is no Volt yet.
built for speed not efficiency
Completely impractical for most American drivers.
Give me an ev that drives 0-40 like a CIvic or any other car, carries 4, can for 45 miles at freeway speed on a single charge.
receive. But they’ll only be building a few thousand of them this year. While the tax credit isn’t as generous as Wade’s, you can get $7,500 for buying one.
I’m on their email list.
They intend to only sell in California this year.
They are not yet in production- and in the world of EV production, “next quarter” is frequently “next year” or the year after that.
It’s $45,000. I could buy two clean diesel vw’s and operae them for the first two years. And the warranty on the battery pack is only 5 years or 2000 charging cycles- with no realistic estimate of cost to replace.
This equation assumes there is a close relationship between the price of something and the true cost to produce and operate it.
Since many costs of producing petroleum and operating cars have been externalized, your equation is not.
But it feels pretty expensive for me to personally internalize the currently un-priced externalities.
I’d rather ride a bike.
Good point.
Similarly, I wish I could afford a mid-life crisis, Tesla style.
I wish I could Afford a mid-life crisis.
Maybe I’ll start a charity- Men Without mid-life crisis budget
Could just be “people” instead of men, but I’ve never seen a woman, mid-life or not, that couldn’t get a girlfriend or wanted a beard or radical sports car/motorcycle.
This is the way that all manufacturers should have gone with hybrids & electrics. Make the car sexy and desirable (especially for men with too much money and at mid-life crisis stage).
Currently, electric cars and hybrids are “sensible.” This does not create the same sort of demand as “sexy.”
Since the initial run of cars will always be pretty pricey, they need to be desirable to those with money to burn. Then demand increases among all the rest of us and the per unit price will go down.
Tesla is already working on a four-door “family” car that will cost less.
I respect you, Wade. You have the integrity to post under your own name.
I’m all for alternative energy and decreasing our reliance on oil, but most of what you propose isn’t feasible or politically possible.
1. 70% tax credit for all electric cars is not politically possible, and there are not enough of them to make a difference. Too heavy of a credit, the solar industry died in the 80’s when Reagan got in office and 30% credits went away. IF the Repubs get back in power the 70% credit will go away and these cars will die with it.
2. Converting an $ 8,000 used car to electric would cost $20 to $30, 000 (parts and labor). In most cases it’s not feasible because there no way to locate the large battery needed in a car not originally designed to have one. The biggest technological challenge and delay in developing the Volt was the battery. And what technicians know how to do this? Virtually none.
3. Federal fleet mandate requirements might be feasible but again right now there’s not enough product. This would have to be phased in over a few years.
in addition to a credit for the car, tuition credits for the techs to go back to school and learn how to do conversions.
Tuition credits for the engineers to go to school and learn how to design and build better batteries. And solar panels. And fusion. And … you get the point.
But as far as converting cars to electric, its not economically feasible even if there were trained people to do it. Would you spend $300,000 fixing up a $100,000 home? I wouldn’t.
Would I spend $20,000 on a new liquid fuel car or spend $20k to convert my existing car to electric?
If I could get 100k out the batteries and my car could get 40-50 miles on a full charge at highway speed, and charge off household ac in less than 8 hours and I could finance the deal just like I could if I was buying it new, I’d keep my car and convert it.
But the demo that you are describeing neither needs nor is motivated by the giant tax credit WN is proposing.