If your lawyer was sleeping with the judge, and the other side hired one of his law clerks, you wouldn’t complain about the other side hiring the law clerk, would you?
How bright would you have to be to understand that might draw attention to your lawyer sleeping with the judge?
You wouldn’t want to embarrass the lawyer, call the judge’s impartiality into question or make you look sleazy for hiring somebody that you knew was sleeping with the judge.
Apparently, you would have to be brighter than the Jane Norton campaign.
Last week, Ken Buck announced the hiring of Kay Rendleman. She was the Chair of the El Paso county GOP and has significant experience in grassroots organization going back to the Ronald Regan campaign of 1980. El Paso county is considered a critical county in Republican primaries and Buck beat Norton there 41% to 33% in the March caucuses.
A person in the know, with no dog in the fight, Muhammad Ali Hasan, who is running for State Treasurer, assessed the hire on this site as follows:
Kay is terrific
This is a great pickup for Ken Buck
I’ve gotten to know Kay Rendleman very well – we announced our State Treasury campaign at the GOP HQ in El Paso, in addition to the many events we’ve attended in El Paso County – Kay has done a terrific job there – not only does she command the respect of the GOP, more importantly, she is a very good organizer and manager
Again, this is a great pickup for Buck and exactly what their campaign needs at this time.
The gracious or classy thing for the Norton campaign to do would have been to thank her for all of the volunteer work she has done for all Republicans and to wish her well, much like Ali did.
Instead of congratulating Kay or thanking her for the unpaid, thankless job of county chair, the Norton campaign had two of their El Paso county co-chairs, Chuck Broerman and Rep Mark Waller interviewed by the Colorado Springs Gazette, go negative on her. Neither disclosed their relationship to the Norton campaign. Both whined about the timing. Broerman put it as follows:
Broerman said he’s disappointed that Rendleman picked sides in a primary race, something that’s taboo for party officials who are supposed to sit on the sidelines until party members pick a nominee.
“It puts Ken Buck and his campaign above any of the other campaigns,” Broerman said
It is not exactly a well kept secret that Norton has a senior staff person working on her staff who is the “fiancé” of the chairman of the Colorado Republican Party, Dick Wadhams. http://www.tonysrants.com/colo…
Wadhams has been dismissive of the significance of the relationship telling Rossputin “Wendy Evans is a professional woman in her own right and is entitled to work for whomever she wants”.
That is clearly true, but it is also true that while the lawyer is entitled to sleep with the judge if she wants, what does that tell you about the judge and the party that employs the lawyer who they know to be sleeping with the judge?
To paraphrase El Paso County Co-chair of the Jane Norton for Senate campaign, Chuck Broerman, It puts her campaign above any of the other campaigns.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: kwtree
IN: Thanksgiving Weekend Open Thread
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Thanksgiving Weekend Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Thanksgiving Weekend Open Thread
BY: itlduso
IN: Thanksgiving Weekend Open Thread
BY: itlduso
IN: Thanksgiving Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: unnamed
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Who’s sleeping with who?
Wadhams is sleeping with Norton.
in quotation marks? Are you suggesting it’s a sham engagement, or are the quotation marks required because it’s a foreign word?
Their engagement was announced in January. The wedding was to take place over the memorial day weekend. The link to Tonysrants, above, links to the announcement in the Denver Post. I have no information that suggests there have been any change in plans. There is no suggestion that it is a sham engagement.
My suggestion is that a campaign where a senior member is engaged to the person charged with assuring a level playing field should not be bitching about an unpaid county chairman resigning to work on a campaign.
The proper thing to do is for that person to step down until after the primary or for the state chairman to do the same.
OK, thanks for clearing that up. So you’re calling on Dick Wadhams to resign until August and, what, take a two and a half month “honeymoon”? Sounds like a splendid idea!
But the world of hard-core politics is small, so if he finds someone he wants to marry who happens to be working for one of the candidates, I don’t think that should make a difference to the state party or to the campaign. That’s a whole other thing than a party official actively campaigning for a primary candidate, which is forbidden by party rules.
Evans did not resign, continues to work on the Norton campaign and the Norton campaign is the one complaining.
Evans was not the State Chair of the Colorado Republican Party. You’re starting to look desperate here.
And Evans isn’t the Chair of the State Party so no problem here. It will be a cold day in hell before my career choices are dictated to me by who I fuck.
Got it?
to using that last sentence as a sig line !
to defending Jane Norton and Dick Wadhams’s fiance. Christ.
My master plan is working to a t!
Coooooome tooo the daaaaark siiiiiide!
And guess which one I’m inclined to do to you right now.
Since we’re talking about Dick Wadhams here, please consider whether you want to evoke horrible mental images before you ever type anything on here again, OK?