U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) George Stern
(D) A. Gonzalez
(R) Sheri Davis
40%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
July 21, 2010 06:13 PM UTC
29 Comments
The more Bennet wants to make this an issue in the public discourse, the more people will examine his votes in comparison to his contributions.
why are you turning out a dairy a day whining about them?
You’ve gone from a Romanoff supporter in the vein of MikeD1970 to a Bennet supporter in the course of 7 months. Not that I’m complaining, but there’s definitely been a change in the tone of your commentary on this race. A stark change.
I realized AR was seeking the nomination on terms that guaranteed he’d lose in the general. Who needs that?
As others have noted, AR’s PAC was still open for business until four days before AR announced he was running. Only after he learned he wouldn’t be receiving PAC money did he “convert.”
Just one more example of “About Face Andrew.”
But if so, that’s just making a virtue out of a necessity. And that has led many politicians to accomplish great things. So I don’t see it as a reason to ping AR.
If he wants to explain why he took tens of thousands of dollars from PACs’ over the years, including years where he had no primary opponent and ran unopposed, let him spend his measly cash on hand to do it.
This is what happens when you arrive at a gun fight with a spatula, AR supporters. You get gunned down.
Oh wait, we’re not on the playground 🙂
I think Bennet’s response could actually hurt Bennet. His answer comes across as yes PACs buy influence, but Romanoff used to be bought too so we’re both tainted. I think that hurts Bennet when it’s still bought (Bennet) vs used to be bought (Romanoff).
to the average voter, David. Please, spend that money!
I think the facts will speak for themselves.
Did you read the Statesman articles on the Colorado Springs debate?
Seriously.
to fight off his oppponent’s “defamation”.
He really really really needs that new ad to play more? Or he’s hoping to cut a new response ad? Maybe he wasn’t expecting Bennet to respond quite so quickly?