U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

Governor See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
December 31, 2019 05:18 PM UTC

Tens & Twenties – Climate Crisis Calls for “Urgent and Unprecedented” Action

  • 20 Comments
  • by: PKolbenschlag

(Promoted by Colorado Pols)

A take on the “Tens” & Looking forward to 2020s

Climate Crisis central to Colorado’s energy and resource issues

Water and drought, land use, agriculture, economic risks of fossil fuels, impacts of fracking, the long-sought Grail that would squeeze profit from rock, LNG export, coalmine methane pollution, Colorado’s wildlife and sensitive species, the booming outdoor industry and our shared public lands: These issues, that have dominated much of Colorado’s past decade of energy and resource news, all connect directly with the looming climate crisis.

Climate change demands action for a livable, prosperous Colorado

Despite all this, during the 2010’s progress has advanced, at best, in fits and starts. The current administration in DC is not just resistant, but outright inimical to, climate action. It eschews even mention of climate change. And while progress in Colorado, like in many states and localities across the nation, has been more encouraging, without stronger federal leadership this will likely not be enough. The next decade must be marked by an “all-in” commitment – And 2020 is a year we can hold our elected leaders directly accountable.

2010’s – Climate crisis will not be ignored

The “Tens” were a decade when the reality of the climate crisis hit home like never before for millions Americans and billions across the globe.

The 2010’s revealed increasing evidence of what our inability to address the climate crisis will mean for humanity’s future. They were also marked by increasingly strident demands, even from the more often stoic scientists, calling for “urgent and unprecedented” action to avoid worse consequences to come.

Nonetheless, fossil fuel corporations, rising energy demand, unfettered capitalism, and other status quo politics pushed the world in the wrong direction during the past decade. In the U.S., whatever small advances were made by the Obama administration were quickly undone and aggressively reversed under President Trump.

Science calls for “urgent, unprecedented” action as “extreme weather” dominates news

Numerous key reports over the past decade reveal the scope of the challenge. Earlier climate models have been shown to be correct, but also too optimistic. During the past decade science recorded numerous feedback loops or “tipping points,” which could indicate that “worse case scenarios” have become more likely than once thought. As governments fail to act, the challenge grows more difficult and the impacts more extreme.

Colorado in the crosshairs

Warming Stripes for Colorado shows annual average temperatures for Colorado from 1895-2018 using data from NOAA, this and more great graphs can be found at www.climate-lab-book.ac.uk/visualisation-resources/

Among the growing body of evidence underlining our plight, during the 2010’s we learned with more clarity what specifically the climate crisis means for our region. Less water, increased aridity of the land, more wildfire and infestations in our forests, and changes in weather, precipitation patterns, and predictability are all in store for Colorado.

The Southwest, the Rocky Mountains, and the Plains all face significant warming and severe impacts from the climate crisis – putting our state and our top industries squarely in the crosshairs of the climate crisis.

The Age of Trump and U.S. Senate complicity

The earlier part of the decade was marked by some first steps toward addressing climate change at the federal level. Under the Obama administration, agencies began tracking and accounting for their contribution to climate pollution, and to consider active management to address it. Executive actions under President Obama, like the Clean Power Plan and Clean Car standards, were among the U.S. government’s first-ever major actions to address climate change. But that all changed with administrations.

Starting in 2017, federal efforts to address climate change have been methodically undone. With three co-equal branches of government, Congress and the Courts can check a rogue anti-science administration. And while the Courts have provided some balance to the most anti-environmental administration in U.S. history, Congress has been another matter. There a partisan divide has led to failure, as the U.S. Senate sits idly by while America’s bedrock environmental laws, prized public lands, and climate leadership are eviscerated.

2020’s – A pivotal year and decade ahead

The decade of the 2020’s will be marked by our response in adapting to, mitigating for, and avoiding worsening consequences from climate change. And by rising political and global conflict from impacts already resulting from the climate crisis and over the scale of our strategies to address it.

Water and the Colorado River are likely to be flash points driving conflict as climate change takes its toll in the U.S. Southwest.

Our success at navigating those challenges, or our failure to do so, will benefit or burden not only ourselves here and now, but especially our kids, grandchildren, and all those that would follow.

This means that 2020 and the decade that follows will see conflicts spawned, debates waged, and solutions developed, as climate policy moves front-and-center into all aspects of our politics, economy and culture. For while the stakes are existential and the political impediments are real – including lack of leadership from the Trump administration and in the U.S. Senate – failure is not yet certain. But the 2020s will be pivotal in whether or not it will be. We can start making meaningful progress now and in the decade ahead. Colorado should continue to position itself as a global leader in this necessary transformation.

We have solutions to take bold climate action now

The fossil fuels that power our economy are harming our ability to prosper, damaging our health, and wrecking the environment. We must realign our economy to function without fossil fuels. That has been the unequivocal and increasingly obvious message from science and the natural world over the past decade.

The better news is that we have the knowledge, technologies and practices to start making a real difference, to initiate the urgent and unprecedented response to the climate crisis that scientists say is needed. The worse news is that we have not yet shown the resolve to do so.

Colorado can be leader in necessary transformation of energy economy

While we lack the political will at the federal level to mount an appropriate response, we can make real strides in that direction at the state and local level in the meantime. Better still, all of Colorado, and Colorado’s economy, can benefit from, and be part of, taking action now – including agriculture, energy, and outdoor recreation.

Political leaders must be held to account – and 2020 is the year to do it

The takeaway is this. Colorado can be a leader in the transformation of the energy economy that we must undertake, but that effort is hampered by a failure in political leadership. While blame for inaction is not limited to the federal government, with a current administration that is inimical to addressing climate change, more federal accountability is clearly needed.

Greta Thunberg has help catalyze a movement that is certain to impact the decade ahead, as a generation facing severe consequences from their elders’ inaction will not wait to age into power.

Politics will be a dominant theme in 2020. This presents an opportunity to demand climate action. Our elected leaders, especially those that have means to impact the current failure in the U.S. Senate – like Colorado’s Senator Cory Gardner – must be compelled to act.

As Time Magazine’s “Person of the Year” climate and youth activist Greta Thunberg has made clear: the 2020’s will be a decade of climate accountability. Younger people especially, but really all who are bearing the brunt of the climate crisis – including agricultural operators, outdoor enthuthiasts and the recreation industry, banks and insurance companies, and frontline communities – all will be demanding, with more urgency and in unprecedented numbers, that our political leaders make climate action a top priority.

At the front end of a pivotal decade, 2020 will be a year for climate accountability. And it starts tomorrow.

Tweet
Share

Comments

20 thoughts on “Tens & Twenties – Climate Crisis Calls for “Urgent and Unprecedented” Action”

  1. Add in the economic consequences of the changing businesses in extraction of uranium, oil shale, fracking for oil and natural gas, and coal mines. 

    With the Australian apocalyptic fires in our news of the new year, the decade is kicking off to be full of disasters which could produce substantial change. But I know some dimensions of the problem, and I will be driving my internal combustion engine several places in the weeks to come, including to DIA so my spouse can catch a plane taking her on the beginning of a tour to (literally) the end of the earth.

    1. geezuzz

       

      Ok.
      but here would be a win
      – D's win the WH and Senate, vette all their judges between Nov and Jan and start nomination, advising and consenting Jan 2021.
      – reestablish a high functioning State department and build solid relationships around the world
      – AG investigates, indicts and convicts criminals
      – US adds states 51 and 52.
      – Mexico collaborates with the US to assist them in becoming as high functioning in the north and west as they are in the DF
      – Psilocybists invent or discover an off switch
      – Denver club and festival scene discovers a 21st century Talking Heads cover band

      Winning.

  3. Thanks for putting together the big picture, Pete. 
    We each must do the task in front of us and within our powers. 

    Big picture winning: Keep the House, take the Presidency and the Senate (preferably not Hick- he may or may not choose climate over fossilonian profits. If he wins the primary and general, he wins, but environmentalists will have to keep the pressure on him and watch his votes, not his words). 

    From the perspective of the environment and climate change, Democrats are better because they at least acknowledge scientific facts, while Republican orthodoxy is still to deny climate change is happening, that it is caused by humans, or that drastic changes are necessary to lessen the catastrophes..
     

    States must keep meeting climate goals and working with the reality-based world. 
    Small changes: more recycling, less plastic, more efficiency and conservation, more renewable energy, less meat, more plant-based diet, better and more equitable allocation of resources. Much more than I can list here. 

    Pick some tasks and tackle them. 

      1. Hickenlooper was pretty good on a wide range of environmental stuff during his 8 years as governor. He was always a welcome guest at Conservation Colorado's annual legislative gatherings.

        As for doing things “within our powers,” I get all my electricity from Xcel Energy’s Windsource program and heat the house with natural gas and passive solar. I recycle heavily.

        I’m still waiting for a decent hybrid 4×4 vehicle that will be capable of getting me to back country trailheads. Also still waiting for that electric vehicle that can go more than a couple hundred miles before requiring lengthy downtime for recharging. Those work back east with the short distances required for driving here to there. But not in the West with our long distances.

        1. Just for grins, CHB, could you elaborate on the "pretty good on a wide range of environmental stuff" comment, please?

          I would genuinely like to hear you, or anyone really, detail the former governors' environmental accomplishments.

          1. He personally filtered some contaminated Animas River water through his very own liver and kidneys, once.

            Can you think of any other Governor who would have ever done that? . . .

              1. That's fine.

                My research says he is "pretty shitty on a wide range of environmental stuff".

                So we can just go with my research and conclude your statement was ill-founded and irrelevant.

                Hey…this works well. I like it.

                  1. You know better. A FreeStuff loving, bleeding heart, tree hugging, card carrying LWNJ like me doesn't even speak Tancredish. 

                    My research comes from personal experience. Yours?

    1. …oh, we could say more: 

      Texas fast-tracks seawalls for oil and gas infrastructure

      Construction is slated to begin in the next few months and once these disparate projects are complete, they could become part of a larger protection network if the rest of the funding is secured later. Still, the irony of the fossil fuel industry asking for money to protect against the effects of climate change was not lost on advocates and casual observers.

      1. Ok, everybody stand on their heads and recite the Greek alphabet backwards ten times . . .
         

        . . .  if you have any trouble imagining a group of today’s GOPer legislators gladly approving the use of taxpayer dollars to protect bigly oil companies from the ravages of climate change — that they don’t “believe” exists??? . . . 
         

        It’s good to be king corporations!
         

         

      2. With the possible exception of NFL owners, no one does welfare queenery like the oil and gas industry. Privatize the profit, socialize the risk. 

        1. Well, farmers…

          Ethanol production is encouraged because ethanol is required in gasoline mixtures.

          The Trump tariffs are paid by the importers, i.e. those of us who by imported things. China stops buying farmers products. Then Trump gives farmers money to compensate.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

77 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!