U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) George Stern
(D) A. Gonzalez
(R) Sheri Davis
40%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
September 16, 2010 08:26 AM UTC
9 Comments
Gardner refused.
It is disappointing to have it cancelled. Gardner should rethink his opposition to these debates. The voters need info and one prime method is to include everyone who has made the ballot. Gardner ought consider the future. In 2 years it is likely the GOP would be a minority party and under his rules he would not be allowed to be in the debate if he is a candidate then.
Why won’t the Congressman defend votes FOR Cap and Trade, Banking bill, Obamacare, Bailouts, and Tax Hikes?
I know I’m interested in hearing much more about how these diversions of private capital, increases in government regulation and other programs of ‘change’ are helping put COloradans to work.
It’s 33% lower.
15 is 50% more than 10, but 10 is 33% less than 15.
You’re welcome.
The polling threshold for Presidential debates is at a threshold that is 50% greater then that offered to Markey here in Colorado … yet she still decides to freeze the voters out.
It’s a sad day for CD4 voters, they should know their Congressmanis voiding accountability.
Markey, dodging the citizens of Colorado.
Pick a fight with your local media and see if they find a way to get back at you. Very strategic.
This really should be promoted to the front page.
At the very least it is a debatable point.
They don’t promote diaries that make Dems look bad. No matter how you cut this, Markey comes off as a jerk.
Instead you get the game changer that Markey, an incumbent, gets the NRA endorsement on the front page.
There are lots of good people posting.
Maybe next cycle there will be a Colorado political blog which exhibits some sense of balance.
Markey is actually standing up for the Likes of Tom Tancredo. In insisting Only to debate with ALL parties involved.
It is not that she is scared to debate but rather Inclusive as to allowing All parties to get their message Out.
Is that really the reality? You dont think she is doing this because of the political ramifications? If you answer that honestly you should change the title of your post.
From a philosphic point of view, how is this any different from the Repubs who were trying to put homeless people as Green party candidates on the ballot?
It is not her job to ensure her opponents have a chance to “get their message out.” If that were the case, she should run a few commercials for them.
Can we PLEASE just cut the crap and quit acting like she is the champion of the ACP????