U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
October 26, 2010 03:06 AM UTC

Diaries of a Rubber Stamp #12

  • 12 Comments
  • by: bjwilson83

Michael Bennet is indecisive on the Northern Integrated Supply Project for water. Rubberstamp Man mourns the lack of anything to stamp. Ken Buck says he will make the decision.

Rubberstamp Man endorses Ken Buck for U.S. Senate! He had hopes that Bennet would come back to him, but it appears that the sellout was complete.

Comments

12 thoughts on “Diaries of a Rubber Stamp #12

  1. I thought they had to be approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and receive the blessing of the Executive Office of the President to fulfill NEPA review requirements.  Correct me if I’m wrong, please.

    If my understanding is correct, than what you are actually implying is that the USACE would take advice from Congress, regardless of impact and that President is not convinced, making this “rubber stamp” unsure, too.  Meaning that your dumbass joke is, well, dumb.  Least of all because yet another joke pointed toward the armed services in any way will just remind the vets here.  Good luck with that.

    OR you didn’t bother to research anything and instead picked a random bit of a debate to make some kind of faux point.  Sorry, not you so much as Buck’s campaign.  But research before statement has never been his strong point… according to you.  Funny how that works.

  2. Conclusive proof BJ is really just a creepy alternate personality for a liberal democrat named David Chestnut: http://www.coloradopols.com/di

    David, I hope that when the Nice Folks In White Coats come for you and try to resolve your split personalities, they help you realize that David Chestnut was who you really have been all along, and this creepy “BJ Wilson” is just a disturbed alternate personality that arose from some suppressed trauma that can be cured promptly.

    David, in the interest of furthering the effort to cure you of this BJ personality, I will be calling you David C from now on — to reinforce the man you should be, not the too-creepy-to-be-real personality you’ve been displaying here. David, welcome back to the world after years of suppression of your identity by your creepy alternate personality!

      1. If I ever get banned and come back for the next election cycle, I’ll post under ChestNutz. Then only the old timers will know who I am. Although I suppose they would out me again.

        1. Which would mean, you know, that you don’t use any actual identifying information.

          Eh, why bother. We’d recognize your style instantly, like everyone recognized Steve Harvey’s dozens of aliases.

  3. That JeffcoBlue has put to you, dear ol’ Davy Chestnutz.

    1. You have previously said you work, at least in a volunteer capacity, for the Buck campaign. Is this activity sanctioned by the campaign? Is your immediate supervisor at the Buck campaign aware of this activity? Is any other employee or volunteer of the Buck campaign aware of it? Do other volunteers/employees participate?

    2. Do you consider it honest politics to represent yourself as an “agnostic Democrat,” when you clearly are not? Or to imply you support “single payer” health care when you do not?

    3. How could you be so stupid as to use an email address that is readily identifiable? You can plead the 5th on this one.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

118 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!