Bob Kinsey came really, really close to becoming Colorado’s version of Ralph Nader this year.
As Colorado’s Green Party candidate for U.S. Senate, Kinsey got 2.1% of the vote Tuesday. Bennet beat Buck by a 1.1% margin, with 97% of precincts reporting.
Kinsey says many of his supporters wouldn’t have voted at all, and others might have voted for Buck.
Still, if Green Party voters here reflect the Green Party voters in Floriday for Ralph Nader in 2000, then Kinsey took more votes from Bennet. Had the race been close enough, this could have swung the election to Buck.
Does Kinsey have regrets?
“Well you know what, Bennet is in favor of increasing military spending. Neither one [Buck or Bennet] is going to challenge the military any more than Obama is. No I have no regrets. I have no regrets that I tried to get this country to talk about the military.”
Kinsey, who got about 2% of the vote when he ran for U.S. Senate in 2008, was almost invisible in the Denver media this election cycle. His name appeared once in The Denver Post over the past year. He said he got some decent coverage statewide, but not much, even by left-leaning outlets like KGNU radio in Boulder. I asked him what the media missed in not covering him.
“My major focus is foreign policy,” he said. “I want to cut the military budget by 75% and use that money to create jobs. If you include in miliatrey spending the drug war, Homeland Security, the CIA, and other agencies, that’s over a trillion dollars a year. The AFSC calculated that you could provide every unemployed person with a $50,000 job and the U.S. would still spend more on the military than any other country in the world.”
In 2008, Democrats worried that Kinsey could tip the election away from Mark Udall. They worried again this year. But Kinsey will be one Green candidate they won’t have to think about when Udall is up in four years.
“I am 73-years-old,” Kinsey told me when I asked if he’d run again. “Next time around for Senate, I’d be 77. What I plan on doing is trying to get the Green party to get some other good candidates and build a party. I don’t think so. I’ve done it three times, once in the 4th Congressional [2004] and twice for Senate, and I gave people the opportunity to vote against militarism, and I got 35,000 votes.
I don’t have the energy at 77 to do it again, but I will continue to speak out against militarism.”
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Friday Jams Fest
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Dems Save The Day, Government To Stay Open
BY: Gilpin Guy
IN: Weld County Gerrymandering Case Pushes The Boundaries Of Home Rule
BY: SSG_Dan
IN: Friday Jams Fest
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Friday Jams Fest
BY: bullshit!
IN: Friday Jams Fest
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Friday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
No green party?Perhaos we can get Sirota to form a Chomsky party.
It was surprising (to me) how seldom these raised their heads this cycle. I’m not so sure that progressives (I lean socialist.) couldn’t partner with libertarians on some issues: imperialistic adventurism, big brother in our bedrooms and our persons, exporting “Western” ideologies (political and religious), etc. However, it would be an uneasy aliance: their unfettered corporatism, anti-taxism, etc. Frankly, I think the same of any true aliance between the faux TeaPublicans and the libertarians. Very uneasy, as we’ll soon see.
Kinsey is right. He didn’t get the media. I was not aware of him at all. In retrospect, I’m glad, given the close call for Senate.
Overall, 5% of the vote went to 3rd parties in the Senate race. So, to cll out Bob Kinsey is a bit unfair. If you combine Stringer and Napolitano, they took as many votes as Kinsey. And if there’s no Libertarian, does Buck win?
Hell, even Cahrley Miller could have played king-maker.
Michael Bennet [D] 794,724 48% (X)
Ken Buck [R] 779,280 47%
Bob Kinsey [G] 36,168 2%
Maclyn Stringer [L] 20,844 1%
Jason Napolitano [I] 18,077 1%
Charley Miller [U] 10,575 1%
http://kdvr.biz/public/electio…
Pretty obvious, eh?