U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
January 28, 2011 04:11 AM UTC

Hancock supporter abusing position at DPS?

  • 14 Comments
  • by: FrontRangeRiffRaff

You’d think after all the nonsense last year people would have learned not to misuse their position to further their support of a candidate running for office. With how much tension there is about DPS (just look at the front-paged diary about the Easley recall), I’d think the people at DPS would want to stay as far away from the mayor’s race as possible. For most of the candidates that is what’s going on. Except for Michael Hancock.

Hancock has made no secret that he thinks not only should he run the city of Denver, he thinks he should take over control of DPS. He’s already got Teresa Pena, Bruce Hoyt and Mary Sewell from the school board. Nate Easley is supporting him too but he’s working hard to keep distance publicly. If that’s not enough, a friend passed along the flyer below that was put in teachers and other staffs inboxes at Omar Blaire school. The principal there is Debbi Blair-Minter who is listed on Hancock’s website endorsing him. Isn’t there some rule against abusing your position or at least something that says you can’t be using the school to distribute flyers pushing your favorite candidate? What about the teachers who happen to think there are others who are better qualified? How are they supposed to feel about voicing their own opinion when their boss supports Hancock and their inbox at work gets a flyer for Hancock?

Photobucket

Comments

14 thoughts on “Hancock supporter abusing position at DPS?

  1. Let me get this straight: Some national real estate developer (I’m pretty sure they’re based in CA) is looking to make a buck off Denver’s teachers and so Michael Hancock decides to throw them a happy hour?

    I’d understand if this was a small Denver start-up, or even a Denver based company, but it isn’t.

    Either way distributing this flyer in a school is a clear violation of DPS policy — every employee received a detailed memo from the district’s chief legal council at the beginning of January. Blair-Minter should have known better.

    Also, are these big-business sales-pitches — masqueraded as “appreciation events” — a permanent fixture of the Hancock campaign? If so, I’m really interested in a time-share in Maui.

  2. How dare they!

    How dare they exercise their God-given, 1st Amendment Constitutional right! The nerve of these people!

    (FrontRangeRiffRaf? A name in homage to my former and wonderful campaign manager, Kaye Ferry…. Wasn’t Chris Romer the guy who wanted to put toll booths on I70 near Vail?)

    1. Really. Really, I do.

      But that should be “Teachers and Principals.”

      Always remember: Your school principal is your pal.

      “Principles,” on the other hand, refer to underlying truths or governing beliefs. These inanimate things have a hard time endorsing politicians, because they’re inanimate.

      Again, my bad. Sorry to be the grammar cop. I only do it when there’s an underlying lesson for all, including myself.

          1. A huge waste of time and money.  You could be Christ himself and if you had an R behind your name, it wouldn’t matter.

            @Ali-

            I’m supporting Hancock for now, but worst-case scenario, anyone but Chris Romer.

            1. But just curious – why Hancock?

              I’m supporting Hancock, as well, and I’m curious if his popularity is catching on in the GOP, as I hoped it would…

              I did figure that Republicans in Denver would go out of their way to vote AGAINST Romer

              1. He’s probably the least anti-cop candidate running.

                He’s also sensible, fair, and is a good manager.  He listens well, and is really bright.

                In short, IMO, he’s probably the least radical leftie running.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

189 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!