U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
January 28, 2021 01:17 PM UTC

Oil and Gas Industry Blames Biden, Ignores Reality

  • 7 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols
The future is coming, and it doesn’t smell like gasoline.

On Wednesday, President Joe Biden ordered a moratorium on new leases for oil and gas drilling on public lands. As Judith Kohler reports for The Denver Post, this decision led to a lot of angry shaking fists from O&G industry backers:

The order makes tackling climate change a priority and will be in place for public lands and waters while leasing and permitting practices for fossil fuel development undergo a “rigorous review.” It follows a directive issued Jan. 22 that halted new leases and permits for 60 days but allowed high-ranking Interior Department officials to approve activities on federally managed lands…

…But the Denver-based Western Energy Alliance, an industry organization, said a recent study by a Wyoming trade group shows a prolonged leasing moratorium could cost eight Western states as much as $33.5 billion over Biden’s first term and 58,676 jobs annually. The president doesn’t have the authority to ban leasing on public lands, said Kathleen Sgamma, the group’s president, and the group filed a lawsuit Wednesday to stop the executive order.

The O&G industry went with a predictable “sky is falling” response to Biden’s moves, but as Kohler continues for the Post, the reality is much different:

Brad Handler, senior fellow for public policy at the Payne Institute at the Colorado School of Mines, said he believes the near-term impact of the leasing moratorium will be much less than the industry says. Several companies anticipated a pause in leasing, which was a pledge that Biden made during the campaign, and they “filed applications aggressively and received permits,” particularly on public lands in the Permian Basin in southeastern New Mexico.

“A few of them say they have as much as four years of running room to proceed as normal,” Handler said. “So, I think the net impact on the industry will be very small.”

For as much as Republicans and industry shills would like to blame Biden and Democrats for their troubles, their real enemy is something far more immovable: Time.

[mantra-pullquote align=”center” textalign=”left” width=”95%”]“If you can sell a vehicle that doesn’t use any gas at all for the same price of a vehicle that does burn gas, you don’t have to do that math of, is it worth the payback or not?”

 — Ken Morris, vice president for electric and autonomous vehicles at General Motors[/mantra-pullquote]

As The Washington Post reports today, the market (and the world) is changing:

General Motors said Thursday that it will end the sale of all gasoline and diesel powered passenger cars and light sports utility vehicles by 2035, marking an historic turning point for the big U.S.-based carmaker and a future full of new electric vehicles for American motorists… [Pols emphasis]

…Fred Krupp, president of the Environmental Defense Fund, which had worked with GM on its plan, called it a “breakthrough moment.”

“And it’s part of a wave of industry action that reinforces what the Biden Administration is doing,” Krupp said.

This is not dissimilar to an argument that played out over the last decade about the coal industry. Right wing critics and politicians loved to blame Democrats and environmentalists for the death of coal, when the true cause was much less sinister: Coal reached a point where it could no longer compete with cheaper and more efficient energy sources such as natural gas.

That same shift is now happening here. General Motors isn’t phasing out gasoline-powered vehicles because President Biden yelled at them; they’re doing it because market changes compel a new direction. As Ken Morris, GM vice president for electric and autonomous vehicles, told “Automobile” magazine in April 2020:

The beauty of electric vehicles is, it’s not completely independent of the fuel prices, but I think it’s largely independent of the fuel prices, because there are a couple of things that are important. One, we feel so strongly about electric vehicles because [GM’s] mission statement is zero crashes, zero emissions, and zero congestion. Electric vehicles are zero-emissions right out of the box. That’s a key element.

Two, you also talk about the driving experience and the ownership experience. You don’t have to go to the gas station at all. You can charge at home, you can charge at work, you can charge at the rapidly growing infrastructure that has charge stations around the country.

For as much as right wing politicos love to talk about the importance of preserving a free market economy, they sure get bent out of shape when that same market veers off in another direction.

Things change. The demand for oil and gas is no exception.

Comments

7 thoughts on “Oil and Gas Industry Blames Biden, Ignores Reality

  1. [a]nd 58,676 jobs annually

    Are we really going to have to rehash these bogus numbers?  No one wants anyone to lose their job but we *are* in a transition and by a margin of 7 million votes Americans chose *this* path.  

    A New Energy Economy will produce more new jobs and new streams of revenue than the old economy ever offered. 

  2. …and besides…how many lives and livlihoods have been lost to the clown show these same fucking companies have been funding.

    Mouthpieces like Kathleen Sgamma have always had a fast and loose relationship with the truth. They get paid well for it. But it is getting harder and harder to spread their lies. I am pretty sure Unca Joe knows what he is doing. I know I like it.

    The Oily Boys will not willingly be dismissed. We watched one yesterday ( a mayor from west Texas, IIRC, who must have said a dozen times "the oil and gas industry is being demonized", and "the transition to renewable energy can't be done without the oil and gas companies".

    It was a real "sad trombone" moment.

  3. I can just see the next Republican President and Congress mandate that electric vehicles have a gas tank and require monthly purchases of gasoline to "protect" American jobs and O&G execs' bonuses.

    I like having my "gas pump" in my garage, costing me 3 cents a mile to "fuel" my car.  In a few years, EVs will be cheaper to buy (not just operate as they are today) than ICE vehicles anyway.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

204 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!