UPDATE #2: Once more, for the record, here are the votes for the Payday Lending bill in the State House, where it passed on March 31 before ultimately being killed in the Senate yesterday. Democrats Ed Casso and Sue Schafer were also co-sponsors of the legislation.
—–
UPDATE: Statement from the opponent coalition group, Coloradans for Payday Lending Reform after the jump. Says Rich Jones of The Bell Policy Center, “The two week, triple digit interest rate payday loan that traps so many borrowers in debt is gone from Colorado, and today we made sure these protections remain.”
—–
Earlier today, Democrats on the Senate Local Government Committee killed House Bill 1290–the so-called “payday payback” bill that would have increased fees on many payday loan borrowers, significantly undermining last year’s reform of the industry. Following last year’s legislation, a one-time “origination fee” on payday loans was made refundable on a pro rata basis if the borrower paid off the loan early. If passed, this bill would have pushed annualized interest rates on many payday loans back into eye-popping 300% territory, by allowing payday lenders to keep the full amount of the fee regardless of how quickly the loan was repaid.
The three Democrats on the Local Government Committee, Sens. Joyce Foster, Jeanne Nicholson, and Irene Aguilar, were unswayed by testimony from payday lenders, or arguments from sponsor Sen. Rollie Heath, that payday lenders were unduly suffering from the loss of these millions of dollars in additional profits. After the breakneck speed at which this bill raced through the House, opponents were very concerned that the wheels had been greased for passage by the payday lending industry’s top-shelf lobbyists. It’s worth remembering the many tens of thousands of dollars donated by the payday lending industry to key state legislative Republican 527s in the last election cycle. Putting aside Sen. Heath’s sponsorship of the bill, there’s plenty right there to explain the GOP-controlled House’s willingness to be so accommodating.
Unfortunately for them, three women in the Democratic Senate proved much less so.
Consumer Coalition Prevails Against Payday Lending Industry
Sixty-Four organizations preserve regulations that will benefit
an estimated 200,000 Coloradans annuallyBILL TO UNDO PAYDAY LENDING REFORM DIES IN COMMITTEE!
House Bill 11-1290, which would’ve increased payday lending fees and interest significantly, was voted down by the Senate Local Government Committee today.
Today we have won a significant victory against predatory lending! We were able to protect the legislation that we passed last year which has helped end the cycle of debt for so many hard-working Coloradans struggling to make ends meet.
Payday loans can still be paid back in six months, rather than two weeks, with no penalty for prepayment. “Borrowers have a reasonable amount of time to pay back their loan without the two week time bomb constantly ticking, forcing them to take loan after loan,” said Corrine Fowler from the Colorado Progressive Coalition.The fee structure created in 2010 with a six month loan term and 45% APR, a finance charge and monthly processing fee was preserved and efforts by the payday lending industry to raise interest rates by as much as 235% did not prevail. The borrower can pay back the loan at any time during the six month period and pay only the fees and interest due. Borrowers are paying 67% less in fees on a $300 loan than they paid prior to the 2010 legislation.
For the past decade payday loans created black holes of debt for thousands of Coloradans. By protecting the 2010 legislation hardworking Colorado families have access to emergency cash that includes both a more reasonable interest rate and realistic loan term. “The two week, triple digit interest rate payday loan that traps so many borrowers in debt is gone from Colorado, and today we made sure these protections remain,” said Rich Jones of The Bell Policy Center.
“Despite the desperate and aggressive efforts of payday lending industry lobbyists, progressive advocates engaged the community for months to ensure that our Senators understood the implications of HB 1290. We thank each and every member of the General Assembly who listened to their constituents and stood up against the industry lobbyists and for this important consumer protection measure,” said Corrine Fowler from the Colorado Progressive Coalition.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: harrydoby
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: Early Worm
IN: BREAKING: Restraining Order Stops Dave Williams Ouster Efforts Cold
BY: Duke Cox
IN: BREAKING: Restraining Order Stops Dave Williams Ouster Efforts Cold
BY: Duke Cox
IN: J.D. Vance Really, Really Not Going Over Well
BY: Air Slash
IN: Republicans are Totally Not Terrified of Kamala Harris
BY: Air Slash
IN: Republicans are Totally Not Terrified of Kamala Harris
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
The poor slime. Too bad. May they leave the state unhappy.
Why did Rollie Heath sponsor it? It’s not like he needs campaign contributions from them.
who introduced the last minute amendments in the Senate that added back some payday loan fees to the 45% interest-rate bill that came out of the house. He did that, reportedly, after negotiating a compromise between the lenders and the House version that had passed earlier.
In some sense, Heath helped the cause last year because without his last minute amendments that bill reducing the fees from what they were before and allowing for repayment over six months would not have passed. (Last year’s bill only passed the Senate by one vote with two or three Dems voting against it. The House later adopted the Senate version without revision or reconciliation in order to get the thing into law. The Senate passage and the House adoption of the Senate version came down to, like this year, the last few days of the session.)
Heath said this year that he felt that the Attorney General got the interpretation wrong; that he (Heath) always intended in his amendments for one of the fees (the “origination fee”) to be nonrefundable and fully earned at the time each loan is written. So this year Heath was in a sense keeping his word to the lender’s with the amendments that were nogotiated last year.
I don’t know if one should give him props for honoring what he felt was his commitment and his word, or frown upon his bill this year that would have helped the lenders get back some more fees. (It’s hard to know just how to feel since we rarely find ourselves in the situation of having to judge an elected official for attempting to keep their word even when it’s unpopular to the caucus.)
Anyway, that’s the story as I understand it. I think Awen is more tuned into this than I am, he may have a different view.
I’d like to see a legislator who is committed to Real People, not the lobbyists s/he makes backroom deals with.
But maybe for the same reason he thought Grand Junction and Boulder belong in the same Congressional district.
In other words, because he’s totally out of fucking touch with reality.
Heath has lost a lot of points with me this session.
We need all the women we can get in the state legislature.
Two of the three Democrats who voted for the Payday bill in the House were women (Sue Schafer and Jeanne Labuda).
we need all the women we can get who won’t vote for less restrictive laws on payday lending in the legislature. Or something.
Germans?
Don’t stop her now . . . she’s on a roll . . .
Colorado was tied for first place with New Hampshire for the highest percentage of women serving in the State House and Senate.
Nifty little map here showing who’s at the bottom of the barrel.
I don’t know why we wouldn’t. But just sayin’.
Again, it’s really not a question, but let’s not forget it.
Or just ones we don’t like today? If Dem women are men, the men have to have a chance of being men.
I don’t the rules of this particular game. š